Climatic Change

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 27–56 | Cite as

Canadian vegetation sensitivity to projected climatic change at three organizational levels

  • James M. Lenihan
  • Ronald P. Neilson


The potential equilibrium response of Canadian vegetation under two doubled-CO2 climatic scenarios was investigated at three levels in the vegetation mosaic using the rule-based, Canadian Climate-Vegetation Model (CCVM) and climatic response surfaces. The climatic parameters employed as model drivers (i.e., degree-days, minimum temperature, snowpack, actual evapotranspiration, and soil moisture deficit) have a more direct influence on the distribution of vegetation than those commonly used in equilibrium models. Under both scenarios, CCVM predicted reductions in the extent of the tundra and subarctic woodland formations, a northward shift and some expansion in the distributions of boreal and the temperate forest, and an expansion of the dry woodland and prairie formations that was especially pronounced under one of the scenarios. Results of the response surface analysis suggest the potential for significant changes in the probability of dominance for eight boreal tree species. A dissimilarity coefficient was used to identify forest-types under the future climatic scenarios that were analogous to boreal forest-types derived from cluster analysis of the current probabilities of species dominance. All of the current forest-types persisted under the doubled-CO2 scenarios, but ‘no-analog’ areas were also identified within which an empirically derived threshold of the distance coefficient was exceeded. Maps showing the highest level in the vegetation hierarchy where change was predicted suggest the relative impact of the response under the two climatic scenarios.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anonymous: 1973,Vegetation Regions, National Atlas of Canada, 4th Edition, Department of Energy, Mines, and Resources, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous: 1990,World Weather Disc, Climate Data for the Planet Earth, WeatherDisc Associates, Inc, Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar
  3. Black, R. A. and Bliss, L. C.: 1980, ‘Reproductive Ecology ofPicea mariana (Mill.) BSP.,At Tree Line near Inuvik, Northwest Territories, Canada’,Ecolog. Monog. 50, 331–354.Google Scholar
  4. Bonan, G. B.: 1988,Environmental Processes and Vegetation Patterns in Boreal Forests, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.Google Scholar
  5. Bonan, G. B. and Sirois, L.: 1992, ‘Air Temperature, Tree Growth, and the Northern and Southern Range Limits to Picea mariana’,J. Veg. Sci. 3, 495–506.Google Scholar
  6. Bonan, G. B., Shugart, H. H., and Urban, D. L.: 1990, ‘The Sensitivity of Some High-Latitude Boreal Forests to Climatic Parameters’,Clim. Change 16, 9–29.Google Scholar
  7. Box, E. O.: 1981,Macroclimate and Plant Forms: An Introduction to Predictive Modelling in Phytogeography, Junk, The Hague.Google Scholar
  8. Burns, R. M. and Honkala, B. H.: 1990,Silvics of North America, Volume 1, Conifers, U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Agricultural Handbook 654.Google Scholar
  9. D'Arrigo, R., Jacoby, G. C., Fung, I. Y.: 1987, ‘Boreal Forests and Atmosphere-Biosphere Exchange of Carbon Dioxide’,Nature 329, 321–323.Google Scholar
  10. Davis, M. B.: 1989, ‘Insights from Paleoecology on Global Change’,Bull. Ecol. Soc. Amer. 70, 222–228.Google Scholar
  11. Dickinson, R. E.: 1989, ‘Uncertainties of Estimates of Climatic Change: A Review’,Clim. Change 15, 5–13.Google Scholar
  12. Eagleman, J. R.: 1967, ‘Pan Evaporation, Potential and Actual Evapotranspiration’,J. Appl. Meteorol. 6, 482–488.Google Scholar
  13. Edlund, S. A.: 1983,Bioclimatic Zonation in a High Arctic Region: Central Queen Elizabeth Islands, Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, Current Research, Part A, Paper 83-1A.Google Scholar
  14. Edlund, S. A.: 1986, ‘Modern Arctic Vegetation Distribution and Its Congruence with Summer Climate Patterns’, inProceedings, Impact of Climatic Change on the Canadian Arctic, 1986 March 3–5, Environment Canada, Canadian Climate Program, pp. 84–99.Google Scholar
  15. Emanuel, W. R., Shugart, H. H., and Stevenson, M. P.: 1985, ‘Climatic Change and the Broad-Scale Distribution of Terrestrial Ecosystem Complexes’,Clim. Change 7, 29–43.Google Scholar
  16. Gates, W. L.: 1985, ‘The Use of General Circulation Models in the Analysis of the Ecosystem Impacts of Climatic Change’,Clim. Change 7, 267–284.Google Scholar
  17. George, M. F., Burke, M. J., Pellett, H. M., and Johnson, A. G.: 1974, ‘Low Temperature Exotherms and Woody Plant Distribution’,HortScience 9, 5199–522.Google Scholar
  18. Giorgi, F. and Mearns, L. O.: 1991, ‘Approaches to the Simulation of Regional Climate Change: A Review’,Rev. Geophys. 29, 191–216.Google Scholar
  19. Hansen, J., Fung, I., Lacis, A., Rind, D., Lebedeff, S., Ruedy, R., and Russell, G.: 1988, ‘Global Climate Changes as Forecast by Goddard Institute for Space Studies Three-Dimensional Model’,J. Geophys. Res. 93D, 9341–9364.Google Scholar
  20. Holdridge, L. R.: 1947, ‘Determination of the World Formations from Simple Climatic Data’,Science 105, 367–368.Google Scholar
  21. Houghton, J. T., Jenkins, G. J., Ephraums, J. J.: 1990,Climate Change, the IPCC Scientific Assessment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.Google Scholar
  22. Kemp, D.: 1991, ‘The Greenhouse Effect and Global Warming: A Canadian Perspective’,Geography 14, 121–130.Google Scholar
  23. Lamb, H. H.: 1977,Climate: Past, Present, and Future. Volume 2. Climatic History and the Future, Methuen, London.Google Scholar
  24. Leemans, R. and Cramer, W. P.: 1990,The IIASA Database for Mean Monthly Values of Temperature, Precipitation and Cloudiness on a Terrestrial Grid, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria, Working Paper WP-90-41.Google Scholar
  25. Lenihan, J. M.: 1993, ‘Ecological Response Surfaces for North American Boreal Tree Species and Their Use in Forest Classification’,J. Veg. Sci. 4, 667–680.Google Scholar
  26. Lenihan, J. M. and Neilson, R. P.: 1993, ‘A Rule-Based Formation Model for Canada’,J. Biogeog. 20, 615–628.Google Scholar
  27. Little, E. L.: 1971,Atlas of United States Trees, Volume 1, Conifers and Important Hardwoords, U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Miscellaneous Publication No. 1146.Google Scholar
  28. Manbe, S. and Wetherald, R. T.: 1987, ‘Large-Scale Changes in Soil Wetness Induced by an Increase in Carbon Dioxide’,J. Atmos. Sci. 44, 121–1235.Google Scholar
  29. Monserud, R. A. and Leemans, R.: 1992, ‘Comparing Global Vegetation Maps with the Kappa Statistic’,Ecolog. Model. 62, 275–293.Google Scholar
  30. Neilson, R. P.: 1993a, ‘Transient Ecotone Response to Climatic Change: Some Conceptual and Modelling Approaches’,Ecol. Appl. 3, 385–395.Google Scholar
  31. Neilson, R. P.: 1993b, ‘Vegetation Redistribution: A Possible Biosphere Source of CO2 during Climatic Change’,Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 70, 659–673.Google Scholar
  32. Neilson, R. P.: 1995, ‘A Model for Predicting Continental-Scale Vegetation Distribution and Water Balance’,Ecol. Appl., in press.Google Scholar
  33. Neilson, R. P., King, G. A., and Koerper, G.: 1992, ‘Toward a Rule-Based Biome Model’,Land. Ecol. 7, 27–43.Google Scholar
  34. Overpeck, J. T., Webb, T., and Prentice, I. C.: 1985, ‘Quantitative Interpretation of Fossil Pollen Spectra: Dissimilarity Coefficients and the Method of Modern Analogs’,Quat. Res. 23, 87–108.Google Scholar
  35. Overpeck, J. T., Rind, D., and Goldberg, R.: 1990, ‘Climate-Induced Changes in Forest Disturbance and Vegetation’,Nature 343, 51–53.Google Scholar
  36. Prentice, I. C., Cramer, W., Harrison, S. P., Leemans, R., Monserud, R. A., and Solomon, A. M.: 1992, ‘A Global Biome Model Based on Plant Physiology and Dominance, Soil Properties and Climate’,J. Biogeog. 19, 117–134.Google Scholar
  37. Ritchie, J. C.: 1987,Postglacial Vegetation of Canada, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.Google Scholar
  38. Ritchie, J. C. and MacDonald, G. M.: 1986, ‘The Patterns of Post-Glacial Spread of White Spruce’,J. Biogeog. 13, 527–540.Google Scholar
  39. Rizzo, B. and Wiken, E.: 1992, ‘Assessing the Sensitivity of Canada's Ecosystems to Climatic Change’,Clim. Change 21, 37–55.Google Scholar
  40. Sakai, A. and Weiser, C. J.: 1973, ‘Freezing Resistance of Trees in North America with Reference to Tree Regions’,Ecology 54, 118–126.Google Scholar
  41. Sargent, N. E.: 1988, ‘Redistribution of the Canadian Boreal Forest under a Warmed Climate’,Climatol. Bull. 22, 23–34.Google Scholar
  42. Saville, D. B. O.: 1972,Arctic Adaptations in Plants, Canada Department of Agricultural Research Branch, Monograph No. 6.Google Scholar
  43. Singh, T. and Wheaton, E. E.: 1991, ‘Boreal Forest Sensitivity to Global Warming: Implications for Forest Management in Western Interior Canada’,Forest. Chron. 67, 342–348.Google Scholar
  44. Stephenson, N. L.: 1990, ‘Climatic Control of Vegetation Distribution: The Role of the Water Balance’,Amer. Nat. 135, 649–670.Google Scholar
  45. Tranquillini, W.: 1979,Physiological Ecology of the Alpine Timberline, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  46. Wardle, P.: 1974, ‘Alpine Timberlines’, in Ives, J. D. and Barry, R. G. (eds.),Arctic and Alpine Environments, Methuen, London.Google Scholar
  47. Waring, R. H. and Franklin, J. F.: 1979, ‘Evergreen Coniferous Forests of the Pacific Northwest’,Science 204, 1380–1386.Google Scholar
  48. Woodward, F. I.: 1987,Climate and Plant Distribution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.Google Scholar
  49. Woodward, F. I., Thompson, G. B., and McKee, I. F.: 1991, ‘The Effects of Elevated Concentrations of Carbon Dioxide on Individual Plants, Populations, Communities and Ecosystems’,Ann. Bot. 67 Suppl. 1, 23–38.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • James M. Lenihan
    • 1
  • Ronald P. Neilson
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Botany and Plant PathologyOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  2. 2.Pacific Northwest Research StationU.S.D.A. Forest ServiceCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations