Abstract
Mineral, amino acid and fatty acid composition of pigeon pea meal were determined by analysis, while with chick essays, availability (true digestibility) of minerals and amino acids in the meal were estimated. Gross energy, metabolizable energy and true protein digestibility experiments were also conducted. Pigeon pea meal had a very high content of potassium, high content of potassium, high content of phosphorus, moderate content of calcium and magnesium and low content of iron, zinc, copper and manganese. Average availability of minerals was 58.09%. Amino acid content was low, especially cystine and methionine. Amino acid availability was 82.32%, lower than amino acid availability of soybean meal (>90%). Pigeon pea lipids were predominantly saturated fatty acids (69.04%) with low content of unsaturated fatty acids (30.69%) and a total absence of linolenic acid. Metabolizable energy content (N-corrected) was 11.08 MJ/kg in raw pigeon pea and 12.03 MJ/kg in toasted pigeon pea meal.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akbar S, Khan NA, Hussain T (1973) Amino acid composition and nutritive value of arhar (Cajanus indicus) grown in Peshawar region. Pakistan J of Sci and Ind Res 16: 130–131
AOAC (1984) Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington D.C.
Bragg DB, Ivy CA, Stephenson EL (1969) A method for determining amino acid availability of chicks. Poultry Sci 48: 2134–2137
Deosthale KG, Rao OSS (1981) Mineral and trace element composition of red gram (Cajanus Cajan I) Ind J Nutr and Diet 18: 130-m135
Duncan DB (1955) Multiple F and multiple range tests. Biometrics 11: 1–42
Elias LG, Cristales FR, Bressani R, Miranda H (1976) Chemical composition and nutritive value of some grain legumes. Nutr Abs Rev (Series B 1977) 47: 864–6603
Folch J, Lees M, Sloane-Stanley CHS (1957) A sample method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissue. J Bil Chem 226: 497–509
March BE, Smith I, Sadiq M (1975) Factors affecting estimates of metabolizable energy value of rapeseed meal for poultry. Poultry Sci 54: 538–546
Metcalfe LD, Smitz AA, Pelka JB (1961) The rapid preparation of fatty acid esters for gas chromatographic analysis. Anal Chem 33: 363–364
Mtanga LA, Sugiyama T (1974) A note on the amino acid composition of some legume seeds grown in Tanzania. East African Agric and For J 39: 307–310
Nwokolo E (1986) Evaluation of the nutritional quality of seeds of the African breadfruit (Treculia Africana Deone). Trop Sci (in press)
Nwokolo E, Bragg DB, Kitts WD (1976) A method for estimating mineral availability in feed stuffs. Poultry Sci 55: 2217–2221
Nwokolo E, Oji DI (1985) Variation in metabolizable energy content of raw or autoclaved white and brown varieties of three tropical grain legumes. Anim Food Sci Technol 13: 141–146
Nwokolo E, Sim JS (1986) Nutritional assessment of defatted oil meals of melon and fluted pumpkin by chick assay. J Sci of Food Agric (in press)
PAG (1972) Nutritional Improvement of Food Legumes by Breeding. Proc of FAO Symposium. FAO, Rome, July 3–5, 1972
Singh L, Sharman D, Deodhar AD, Sharman YK (1975) Variation in protein, methionine, tryptophan and period in pigeon pea. (Cajanus Cajan L). Indian J Agric Sci 43: 795–798
Singh U, Jain KC, Jambunathan R, Faris DC (1984) Nutritional quality of vegetable pigeon pea (Cajanus Cajan L). Mineral and trace elements. J Food Sci 49: 645–649
Steel RGD, Torrie JH (1960) Principles and Procedure of Statistics. McGraw Hill Book Company Inc., London
USDA (1984) Composition of Foods: Nut and Seed Products (Raw: Processed: Prepared) Human Nutrition Information Service, United States, Department of Agriculture, USA
Visitpanich T, Batterham ES (1982) Nutritional evaluation of chick pea (Cicer arietinum) and pigeon pea (Cajanus Cajan). Proc Austr Soc Anim Prod 14: 665 (Abstr.)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nwokolo, E. Nutritional evaluation of pigeon pea meal. Plant Food Hum Nutr 37, 283–290 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01092203
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01092203