Skip to main content

Phytic acid, in vitro protein digestibility, dietary fiber, and minerals of pulses as influenced by processing methods

Abstract

The objective of this project was to determine the effect of various types of processing on selected nutrition related parameters of commonly consumed Indian pulses and soybean. Germination reduced the phytic acid content of chickpea and pigeonpea seeds by over 60%, and that of mung bean, urd bean, and soybean by about 40%. Fermentation reduced phytic acid contents by 26–39% in all these legumes with the exception of pigeonpea in which it was reduced by more than 50%. Autoclaving and roasting were more effective in reducing phytic acid in chickpea and pigeonpea than in urd bean, mung bean, and soybean. Germination and fermentation greatly increased the in vitro protein digestibility (IVPD). IVPD was only slightly increased by roasting and autoclaving of all legumes. Germination and fermentation also remarkably decreased the total dietary fiber (TDF) in all legumes. Autoclaving and roasting resulted in slight increases in TDF values. All the processing treatments had little effect on calcium, magnesium and iron contents.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Singh U (1994) Grain quality improvement in pulses: Current status and future research needs. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Pulses Research, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.

  2. 2.

    Food and Agriculture Organization (1993) Food and Agriculture Organization Production Yearbook, Rome, Italy, pp 98, 106.

  3. 3.

    Wijeratne WB, Nelson AI (1991) Processing and utilization of soybean and diversification of end-uses through extrusion processing. In: Uses of tropical grain legumes: proceedings of a Consultants Meeting, 27–30 March 1989, ICRISAT Center, India. Patancheru A.P. 502 324, India: ICRISAT, pp 195–203.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Chitra U, Vimala V, Singh U, Geervani P (1995) Variability in phytic acid content and protein digestibility of grain legumes. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 47: 163–172.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Sathe SK, Salunkhe DK (1984) Technology of removal of unwanted components of dry beans. CRC Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 21: 263–287.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    O'Dell BL, de Boland A (1976) Complexation of phytate with proteins and cations in corn and oilseed meals. J Agric Food Chem 24: 804–808.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Knuckles BE, Betschart AA (1987) Effect of phytate and other myo inositol phosphate esters on alpha-amylase digestion of starch. J Food Sci 52: 719–721.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Singh M, Krikorian AD (1982) Inhibition of trypsin activity in vitro by phytate. J Agric Food Chem 30: 799–800.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Harland BF, Oberleas D (1987) Phytate in foods. Wld Rev Nutr Diet 52: 235–259.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ali R, Staub H, Coccodrilli G, Schanbacher L (1981) Nutritional significance of dietary fiber: Effect on nutrient bioavailability and gastrointestinal functions. J Agric Food Chem 29: 465–472.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Deshpande SS, Sathe SK, Salunkhe DK, Cornforth, DK (1982) Effects of dehulling on phytic acid, polyphenols, and enzyme inhibitors of dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). J Food Sci 47: 1846–1849.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Wheeler EL, Ferrel PE (1971) A method for phytic acid determination in wheat and wheat fractions. Cereal Chem 48: 312–320.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Singh U, Jambunathan R (1981) Methods for the estimation of protein in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) and the relationship between whole grain and dhal protein contents. J Sci Food Agric 32: 705–710.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Singh U, Jambunathan R (1981) Studies on desi and kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars: Levels of protease inhibitors, levels of polyphenolic compounds and in vitro protein digestibility. J Food Sci 46: 1364–1367.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Southgate DAT, Hudson GJ, Englyst H (1978) The analysis of dietary fiber: The choices for the analyst. J Sci Food Agric 29: 979–988.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Piper CS (1966) Mineral analyses by wet digestion with sulphuric acid, nitric acid, and perchloric acid. In: Soil and Plant Analysis, Bombay, India. Hans Publishers, pp 272–274.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Snedecor GW, Cochran, WH (1967) One way classification: Analysis of variance, Ch. 10. In Statistical Methods, 6th edn 258–296. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co, New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Reddy R, Balakrishnan CV, Salunkhe DK (1978) Phytate phosphorus and mineral changes during germination and cooking of blackgram (Phaseolus mungo) seeds. J Food Sci 43: 540–543.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Tabekhia MM, Luh BS (1980) Effect of germination, cooking and canning on phosphorus and phytate retention in dry beans. J Food Sci 45: 406–408.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Eskin NAM, Wiebe S (1983) Changes in phytase activity and phytate during germination of two faba bean cultivars. J Food Sci 48: 270–271.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Marfo EK, Simpson BK, Idowu JS, Oke OL (1990) Effect of local food processing on phytate levels in cassava, cocoyam, yam, maize, sorghum, rice, cowpea and soybean. J Agric Food Chem 38: 1580–1585.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Faridi HA, Finney PL, Rubenthaler GI (1983) Iranian flat breads: Relative bioavailability of zinc. J Food Sci 48: 107–110.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Reddy NR, Salunkhe DK (1980a) Effects of fermentation on phytate phosphorus and mineral content in blackgram rice, and blackgram and rice blends. J Food Sci 45: 1708–1712.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Duhan A, Chauhan BM, Punia D, Kapoor AC (1989) Phytic acid content of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and black gram (Vigna mungo): Varietal differences and effect of domestic processing and cooking methods. J Sci Food Agric 49: 449–455.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Kumar G, Venkataraman LV, Jaya TV, Krishnamurthy KS (1978) Cooking characteristics of some germinated legumes: changes in phytins, Ca++, Mg++ and pectins. J Food Sci 43: 85–88.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kataria A, Chauhan BM, Gandhi S (1988) Effect of domestic processing and cooking on the antinutrients of blackgram. Food Chem 30: 149–154.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Khokhar S, Chauhan BM (1986) Effect of domestic processing and cooking on in vitro protein digestibility of moth bean. J Food Sci 51: 1083–1084.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Boralkar M, Reddy MS (1985) Effect of roasting, germination, and fermentation on the digestibility of starch and protein present in soybean. Nutr Rep Internat 31: 833–836.

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Jood S, Chauhan BM, Kapoor AC (1989) Protein digestibility (in vitro) of chickpea and blackgram seeds as affected by domestic processing and cooking. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 39: 149–154.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Reddy NR, Pierson MD, Sathe SK, Salunkhe DK (1982) Legume-based fermented foods: their preparation and nutritional quality. CRC Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 17: 335–360.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Walker AF, Kochar N (1982) Effect of processing including domestic cooking on nutritional quality of legumes. Proc Nutr Soc 41: 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Reddy NR, Salunkhe DK (1980) Changes in oligosaccharides during germination and cooking of black gram and fermentation of black gram/rice blend. Cereal Chem 57: 356–360.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Valverde VC, Frias J (1991) Legume processing effects on dietary fiber components. J Food Sci 56: 1350–1352.

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Meiners CR, Derise NL, Lau HC, Gews MG, Ritchey SJ, Murphy EW (1976) The content of nine mineral elements in raw and cooked mature dry legumes. J Agric Food Chem 24: 1126–1130.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to U. Singh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chitra, U., Singh, U. & Venkateswara Rao, P. Phytic acid, in vitro protein digestibility, dietary fiber, and minerals of pulses as influenced by processing methods. Plant Food Hum Nutr 49, 307–316 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01091980

Download citation

Key words

  • Legumes
  • Pulses
  • Phytic acid
  • In vitro protein digestibility
  • Germination
  • Fermentation
  • Autoclaving
  • Roasting