Skip to main content
Log in

The protein content of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) grown at different locations

  • Published:
Plant Foods for Human Nutrition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Seed protein content was determined in several genotypes of chickpea grown at different locations in India in different years. Statistical analysis showed that locations had the greatest influence on seed protein content. The effects due to cultivars although significant were of low magnitude. Cultivars × location interactions were found to be nonsignificant and there were good correlations among locations suggesting that breeding for improved seed protein content in chickpea could be effectively carried out at a single location.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gomez KA and DeDatta SK (1975) Influence of environment on protein content of rice. Agron. J 67:565–568

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ulonska E and Baumer M (1976) Studies on the effect of conditions during growth on the success of selection for proteinquantity and quality of barley. In: Evaluation of seed protein alterations by mulation breeding. Proc Symp Habineklee, IAEA, Vienna, 95–106

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hadjichristodoulou A and Athena Della (1978) Factors affecting genotypic and environmental variance for crude protein content in cereals. Euphytica 27:117–126

    Google Scholar 

  4. Esh GC, De TS and Basu UP (1960) Influence of genetic strain and environment on protein content in pulses. Science 129:148–149

    Google Scholar 

  5. Krober OA (1970) Effects of variety and location on the protein content of pulses. Ind J Agric Sci 40:1025–30

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bliss FA, Barker LN, Franckowiak JD and Hall TC (1973) Genetic and environmental variation of seed yield, yield components and seed protein quantity and quality of cowpea. Crop Science 13:656–660

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wood RD, Nowick EA, Fabian HJ and Maclean PE (1979) Genetic variability and heritability of available methionine in the Colorado dry bean breeding programme. In Proc Sym Seed protein improvement in cereals and grain legumes. IAEA/FAO, Munich, West Germany, 1979 pp 69–85

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chatterjee SR and Abrol YP (1975) Amino acid composition of new varieties of cereals and pulses and nutritional potential of cereal-pulse combinations. J Food Sci Technol 12:221–226

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dodd NK and Pushpamma P (1980) Effects of location and varieties on protein, amino acids and mineral contents of chickpea. Indian J Agric Sci 50:139–44

    Google Scholar 

  10. Murthy RS and Pandey S (1978) Delineation of agroecological regions of India. In Proc. Congress of the International Society of Soil Science, Edmonton, Canada, 19–27 June, 1978

  11. Singh U and Jambunathan R (1980) Evaluation of rapid methods for the estimation of protein in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). J Sci Food Agric 31:247–254

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kumar J, Gowda CLL, Saxena NP, Sethi SC, Singh U and Sahrawat KL (1982) Effects of salinity on protein content and seed size of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Current Science (in press)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Submitted as Journal Article No. 228 by the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, U., Kumar, J. & Gowda, C.L.L. The protein content of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) grown at different locations. Plant Food Hum Nutr 32, 179–184 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01091338

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01091338

Keywords

Navigation