Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Male-biased sex ratio and promiscuous pollination in the dioecious island treeLaurus azorica (Lauraceae)

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pollination ofLaurus azorica (Lauraceae), a dioecious Macaronesian tree, was studied. Male and female trees had the same size distribution. The population had 2.5 times as many male trees as females. In addition, males produced more flowers, and their inflorescences lasted longer. Individual flower lifetime and length of flowering season were the same in both sexes. Between the years of observation, one tree changed sex. Pollinators wereHalictinae bees and the flyTachina canariensis. The bees collected pollen and nectar and the fly collected nectar from both sexes. Both species visited other plants as well. The evolution of breeding systems inLauraceae is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerley, D. D., Rankin-de-merona, J. M., Rodrigues, W. A., 1990: Tree densities and sex ratios in breeding populations of dioecious Central AmazonianMyristicaceae. — J. Trop. Ecol.6: 239–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. E., Irvine, A. K., 1989: Flowering, sex ratios, pollen-ovule ratios, fruit set, and reproductive effort of a dioecious tree,Myristica insipida (Myristicaceae), in two different rain forest communities. — Amer. J. Bot.76: 74–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronne, G., Wilcock, C. C., Pizzolongo, P., 1993: Pollination biology and sexual differentiation ofOxyris alba (Santalaceae) in the Mediterranean region. — Pl. Syst. Evol.188: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbero, M., Benabid, A., Peyre, C., Quézel, P., 1981: Sur la presence au Maroc deLaurus azorica (Seub.)Franco. — Anales Jard. Bot. Madrid37: 467–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawa, K. S., 1980: Evolution of dioecy in flowering plants. — Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst.11: 15–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, J. H., 1981: Pollinator foraging and the evolution of dioecy. — Amer. Naturalist118: 572–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramwell, D., Bramwell, Z. I., 1990: Flores silvestres de las Islas Canarias. — Madrid: Rueda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D. E., 1990: Sexual dimorphism and fruit production in a dioecious understorey tree,Ilex opaca Ait. — Oecologia85: 381–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceballos, L., Ortuño, F., 1951: Estudio sobre la vegetacion y la flora forestal de las Canarias occidentales. — Madrid: Ministerio de Agricultura.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, D., 1984: Androdioecy and the evolution of dioecy. — Biol. J. Linn. Soc.22: 333–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cipollini, M. L., Wallace-Senft, D. A., Whigham, D. F., 1994: A model of patch dynamics, seed dispersal and sex ratio in the dioecious shrubLindera benzoin (Lauraceae). — J. Ecol.82: 621–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruden, R. W., 1977: Pollen-ovule ratios: A conservative indicator of breeding systems in flowering plants. — Evolution31: 32–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delesalle, V. A., Muenchow, G. E., 1992: Opportunities for selfing and inbreeding depression inSagittaria congeners (Alismataceae) with contrasting sexual systems. — Evol. Trends Pl.6: 81–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delph, L. F., 1990: The evolution of gender dimorphism in New ZealandHebe (Scrophulariaceae) species. — Evol. Trends Pl.4: 85–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupont, Y. L., Kato, M., 1998a: Sex ratio and flowering in six sympatric dioecious shrub species ofLindera (Lauraceae). — Nordic J. Bot. (in press).

  • - - 1998b: Pollination biology of six sympatric dioecious species ofLindera (Lauraceae). — Nordic J. Bot. (in press).

  • Feinsinger, P., Wolfe, J. A., Swarm, L. A., 1982: Island ecology: reduced hummingbird diversity and the pollination biology of plants, Trinidad, Tobago, and West Indies. — Ecology63: 494–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, J., Cohen, L., 1990: Practical statistics for field biology. — Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J. F., 1985: Incidence of dioecy in relation to growth form, pollination and dispersal. — Oecologia67: 244–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, D. C., McArthur, E. D., Harper, K. T., 1984: The adaptive significance of sexual lability in plants usingAtriplex canescens as a principal example. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.71: 265–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Doust, J. L., El-Keblawy, A., Miglia, K. J., McArthur, E. D., 1997: Sexual specialization and inbreeding avoidance in the evolution of dioecy. — Bot. Rev.63: 65–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guitian, P., 1995: Reproductive biology ofRhamnus legionensis Roth., a dioecious species endemic to the northwest Iberian Peninsula. — Flora190: 345–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, V. H., Moore, D. M., Richardson, I. B. K., Stearn, W. T., (Eds), 1993: Flowering plants of the world. — London: Batsford.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, S. M., 1989: Pollen movement to flowering canopies of pistillate individuals of three rain forest tree species in tropical Australia. — Austral. J. Ecol.14: 77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kato, M., Nagamasu, H., 1995: Dioecy in the endemic genusDendrocacalia (Compositae) on the Bonin (Ogasawara) Islands. — J. Pl. Res.108: 443–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kevan, P. G., Longair, R. W., Gadawski, R. M., 1985: Dioecy and pollen dimorphism inVitis riparia (Vitaceae). — Canad. J. Bot.63: 2263–2267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, B., Beveridge, A. E., 1982: Biological flora of New Zealand 9.Beilschmidia tawa (A. Cunn.)Benth. etHook. F. exKirk (Lauraceae). — New Zealand J. Bot.20: 37–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubitzki, K., Kurz, H., 1984: Synchronized dichogamy and dioecy in neotropicalLauraceae. — Pl. Syst. Evol.147: 253–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, D. G., 1985: Progress in understanding the natural history of New Zealand plants. — New Zealand J. Bot.23: 707–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lughadha, E. N., Proenca, C., 1996: A survey of the reproductive biology of theMyrtoideae (Myrtaceae). — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.83: 480–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabberley, D. J., 1987: The plant-book. — Cambridge University Press.

  • Olesen, J. M., 1985: The Macaronesian bird-flower element and its relation to bird and bee opportunists. — Bot. J. Linn. Soc.91: 395–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1988: Floral biology of the CanarianEchium wildpretii — a bird-flower or a water resource to desert bees? — Acta Bot. Neerl.37: 509–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1992: How do plants reproduce on their range margin? — InThanos, C. A., (Ed.): Plantanimal interactions in mediterranean-type ecosystems, pp. 217–222. — Athens: Univ. Athens.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Warncke, E., 1989a: Predation and transfer of pollen in a population ofSaxifraga hirculus L. — Holarc. Ecol.12: 87–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, —, 1989b: Temporal changes in pollen flow and neighbourhood structure in a population ofSaxifraga hirculus L. — Oecologia79: 205–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Forfang, A.-S., Báez, M., 1998: Stress-induced male sterility and mixed mating in the island plantCedronella canariensis (Lamiaceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.212: 159–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primack, R. B., 1978: Variability in New Zealand montane and alpine pollinator assemblages. — New Zealand J. Ecol.1: 66–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1985: Sex ratio and sexual constancy in spicebush (Lindera benzoin). — Rhodora87: 305–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renner, S. S., Rickleffs, R. E., 1995: Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants. — Amer. J. Bot.82: 596–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohwer, J. G., 1993:Lauraceae. — InKubitzki, K., (Ed.): The families and genera of vascular plants. — Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakai, A. K., Karoly, K., Weller, S. G., 1989: Inbreeding depression inSchiedea globosa andSchiedea salicaria (Caryophyllaceae), subdioecious and gynodioecious Hawaiian (USA) species. — Amer. J. Bot.76: 437–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlessman, M. A., Lowry, P. P., Lloyd, D. G., 1990: Functional dioecism in the New Caledonian endemicPolyscias pancheri (Araliaceae). — Biotropica22: 133–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S., Castellan, N. J., 1988: Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. — New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, A. G., 1981: Flower and fruit abortion: Proximate causes and ultimate functions. — Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst.12: 253–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S. C., LaFrankie, J. V., 1993: Sex, size, and interyear variation in flowering among dioecious trees of the Malayan rain forest. — Ecology74: 1529–1537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J. D., Brunet, J., 1992: Hypotheses for the evolution of dioecy in seed plants. — TREE5: 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, S., Westerkamp, C., Thiel, B., Gessner, K., 1984: Ornithophilie auf den Canarischen Inseln. — Pl. Syst. Evol.146: 225–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerkamp, C., 1990: Blumenvögel auf den Islas Canarias. — Trochilus11: 79–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheelwright, N. T., 1985: Competition for dispersers, and the timing of flowering and fruiting in a guild of tropical trees. — Oikos44: 465–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1986: A seven-year study of individual variation in fruit production in tropical bird-dispersed tree species in the familyLauraceae. — InEstrada, A., Fleming, T. H., (Eds): Frugivores and seed dispersal, pp. 19–35. — Dordrecht: Junk.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Bruneau, A., 1992: Population sex ratios and spatial distribution ofOcotea tenera (Lauraceae) trees in a tropical forest. — J. Ecol.80: 425–432.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ecology & Genetics, University of Aarhus, Ny Munkegade Block 540, DK-8000, Aarhus C, Denmark

    Anne-Sofie Forfang & Jens M. Olesen

Authors
  1. Anne-Sofie Forfang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jens M. Olesen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Forfang, AS., Olesen, J.M. Male-biased sex ratio and promiscuous pollination in the dioecious island treeLaurus azorica (Lauraceae). Pl Syst Evol 212, 143–157 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01089736

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01089736

Key words

Search

Navigation