Plant Foods for Human Nutrition

, Volume 46, Issue 4, pp 299–303 | Cite as

Consumer acceptability of stiff porridge based on various composite flour proportions of sorghum, maize and cassava

  • N. T. A. Bangu
  • K. Mtebe
  • T. S. Nzallawahe


A study was conducted to determine consumer acceptable proportions of flours in sorghum (var. serena) and maize or sorghum, maize and cassava composite flours. Breeder's serena flour extracted at 75 percent was mixed at various proportions with maize or with maize and cassava to constitute composite flours. The various composite flours were made into stiff porridge and presented to a group of panellists for sensory evaluation. The evaluation was conducted by scoring on a hedonic scale of 0–5 for poor to excellent, respectively, for the parameters colour, texture, flavour, taste and overall acceptability. The responses were analysed statistically. Alternatively the panellists were allowed to eat ad-lib any of the presented samples which appealed to them. The results demonstrated that slight incorporation (<10%) of sorghum (var. serena) to maize flour leads to reduction in consumer acceptability. However, increased incorporation of sorghum in excess of 10 percent leads to no significant decrease in consumer acceptability until a level of 30 percent incorporation is exceeded. In sorghum, maize, cassava composite flours the formulation of 30:40:30, respectively, was found to be most acceptable. It is suggested that at this combination of flours desirable textural characteristics of the porridge overrides other factors in contributing to its acceptability.

Key words

Cassava Maise Sorghum 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bangu NTA (1986) Annual report on the sorghum utilization research. IDRC.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reichert RD, Youngs CG (1976) Dehulling cereal grains and grain legumes for developing countries, I: Quantitative composition between attrition and abrasive type mills. Cereal Chem 54: 174–178.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Amerine MA, Pangborn RM, Roessler EB (1965) Principles of sensory evaluation of foods. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vogel S, Graham M (1979) Sorghum and the millet: Food production and use. IDRC.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    UNECA (1985). Technical compendium on composite flours: Technologies available for application. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. T. A. Bangu
    • 1
  • K. Mtebe
    • 1
  • T. S. Nzallawahe
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Food Science and TechnologySokoine University of AgricultureChuo Kikuu, MorogoroTanzania

Personalised recommendations