In a study of two-location families, we have seen that this lifestyle is not historically atypical. Male-determined two-location families have been established for economic and other reasons. The women-determined two-location family seems to be a relatively new pattern. We suggest that the Women's Movement has helped create a situation where it is possible for women to get more support than men for women-determined two-location families. The sustaining of intimacy in such marriages becomes problematic. Stress may be minimized when there is high career motivation in both parties, acceptance of the wife's career motivation by the husband, high incomes, geographical propinquity, and a long-term marital relationship.
KeywordsSocial Policy High Income Social Issue Geographical Propinquity Marital Relationship
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- BENDER, D. R. (1967) “A refinement of the concept of household: families, co-residence, and domestic function.” Amer. Anthropologist 69 (October).Google Scholar
- BERGER, P. and H. KELLER (1964) “Marriage and the construction of reality.” Diogenes 64: 1–23.Google Scholar
- Current Population Report (1975) U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- DOUVAN, E. and J. PLECK (1977) “Separation as support in dual career marriage.” Unpublished manuscript, Survey Research Center, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
- LASLETT, P. [ed.] (1972) Household and Family in Pastime. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
- MURDOCK, G. P. (1949) Social Structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- SCHNEIDER, D. M. (1978) American Kinship: A Cultural Account. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- U.S. Bureau of the Census (1970) Characteristics of the Population. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar