Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The politics of sexuality: Toward a radical-critical approach

  • Articles
  • Published:
Alternative Lifestyles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

From a radical-critical perspective, the gap between the everyday world as experienced and the sociological world as theorized is nowhere so apparent as in the area of human sexuality. Conventional research on human sexuality appears atheoretical, ahistorical, and reductionistic. The viability of a radical-critical alternative is demonstrated with examples of research and theory in three sub-areas: (1) sexuality as identity (socialization approach); (2) sexuality as ideology (comparative and historical approach); and (3) sexuality as power (political-economic approach). The paper discusses three distinguishing characteristics of the radical-critical perspective. The approach: (1) is holistic and historical; (2) urges theoretical explanation for each topic of sexuality under investigation; and (3) offers a critical evaluation of thestatus quo and calls for radical change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference Notes

  • Radical-critics question the terms “premarital” and “extramarital” as based on the assumption that everyone marries. Sprey (1969) theorizes, more realistically, that sexuality in American society is becoming an institution autonomous of marriage and family.

  • Laws (1979:184–186) offers a critical overview of Reiss' work on standards of premarital sex behavior. Recently, Reiss (1981) has also evaluated the field.

  • See Osmond (1981b, 1983) for an overview of critical theory and radical structuralism with specific applications to family sociology. My interpretation of “critical humanism” and “radical structuralism” owes much to Burrell and Morgan (1979), who offer an incisive analysis of the interrelationship of critical and radical theories with such tratitional theories as functionalism, symbolic interactionism, conflict theory, etc.

  • Pagels (1976), studying early Christian texts (gnostic works), sees that, before the Roman church codified its sense of the orthodox, a theology had been proposed that was clearly respectful of a female principle. However, orthodoxy later repudiated this approach.

  • Boskind-Lodahl (1976), studying anorexia nervosa in young women, supports the thesis that obsessive dieting constitutes not only an acceptance of the feminine ideal but an exaggerated striving to achieve it. Typical of women involved in the anorexia-bulimarexia cycle are: a disproportinate concern with pleasing others; a reliance on others to validate their sense of worth; an inability to see self as separate from others; dependency, vulnerability to rejection, and low self-esteem.

  • Currently, an estimated 30 million women in the world are suffering the results of clitoridectomy. It is practiced in more than 26 countries with such justifications as custom, cleanliness, insurance of virginity at marriage, and prevention of female promiscuity by physically reducing sexual desire, (see Hosken, 1979).

  • The recent trial of the “Yorkshire Ripper,” who killed 13 women and attempted to murder another seven, illustrates the legal exoneration of the sexual aspects of male aggression (Hollway, 1981).

  • Rape is only one aspect of sexual violence. For a broad, international analysis of gender stratification and “sexual slavery,” see Barry (1979). For a brilliant study of the economics of sexual harassment of working women, see MacKinnon (1979).

  • With cross-cultural, ethnographic data, Chappell (1976) finds that a number of tribal societies use group rape to punish women and to enforce male property rights.

  • It should be noted that a radical-critical approach would not favor family sociologists' efforts at formal theory construction, i.e., the goal of arranging existing generalizations (often derived form survey research) into axiomatic systems to derive a set of laws matching those of the natural sciences. See Osmond (1981b, 1983) for a discussion of the radical-critical position.

References

  • Amir, M.Patterns in forcible rape. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, M.B. Classics: Review essay.Signs Winter, 1976,2 382–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, M.B. “Liberated” women: The classical era. In R. Bridenthal & C. Koonz (Eds.),Becoming visible: women in European history. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1977, p. 60–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, J.B., Johnson, L.D., & O'Malley, P.M.Monitoring the future: Questionnaire responses from the nation's high school seniors. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Institute for Social Research, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bainton, R.Women of the reformation in Germany and Italy. Minneapolis: Augsburg Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bainton, R.Women of the reformation in France and England. Minneapolis: Augsburg Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker-Benfield, G.J.The horrors of the half-known life. New York: Harper and Row, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker-Benfield, G.J. The spermatic economy: A nineteenth-century view of sexuality. In Michael Gordon (Ed.),The American family in social-historical perspective. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1978, p. 374–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, K.Female sexual slavery. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey; Prentice-Hall, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A.S., Gagnon, J.H., & Simon, W. Pornography: High school and college years.Technical reports of the commission of obscenity and pornorgraphy. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boskind-Lodahl, M. Cinderella's stepsisters: A feminist perspective on anorexia nervosa and bulimia.Signs Winter, 1976,2 342–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridenthal, R., & Koonz, C. (Eds.)Becoming visible: Women in European history. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownmiller, S.Against our will: Men, women and rape. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, L., & Zophy, J. (Eds.)The social history of the reformation. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, G., & Morgan, G.Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. London: Heinemann, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, K.L., & Long, R. Premarital sex behavior in the sixties.Journal of Marriage and the Family 1971,33 36–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmody, C. Influence of the world's religions on the status of women. In E.C. Snyder (Ed.),The study of women. New York: Harper & Row, 1979, p. 262–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappell, D. Cross-cultural research on forcible rape.International Journal of Criminology & Penology 1976,4 295–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chodorow, N.The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, R.R., & Bokemeier, J.L. Premarital sex in the seventies.Journal of Marriage and the Family 1980,42 759–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contratto, S. W. Maternal sexuality and asexual motherhood.Signs Summer, 1980,5 776–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowie, C., & Lees, S. Slags or drags.Feminist Review, Autumn 1981, pp. 17–32.

  • Crawford, A.Thunder on the right. New York: Pantheon Books, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidoff, L.The best circles: Women & Society in victorian England. Totowa, New Jersey: Rowman & Littlefield, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, C. Sexual taboos and social boundaries.American Journal of Sociology March, 1982,87 1032–1063.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degler, C.N. What ought to be and what was: Women's sexuality in the ninetenth century. In Michael Gordon (Ed.),The American family in social-historical perspective. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1978, p. 403–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, I. Pornography and repression: A reconsideration.Signs Summer, 1980,5 686–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M.Purity and danger. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M.Natural symbols. New York: Random House, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, C.The Cinderella complex. New York: Summit Books, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, A.Pornography: Men possessing women. New York: G.P. Putman's Sons, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye, N.S. History of childbirth in America.Signs Autumn, 1980,6 97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstein, Z.R.The radical future of liberal feminism, New York: Longman, Inc., 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fasola-Bologna, A. The sociological profession and revolution.Sociological Inquiry 1970,40 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, W.K., & Fuller, G.E. Unraveling the right wing opposition to women's equality. Washington, D.C.: Interchange Resource Center, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M.The history of sexuality, Vol. 1, An introduction. New York: Pantheon Books. Translated by Robert Hurley, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friday, N.My mother my self. New York: Delocorte Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedan, B.The second stage. New York: Summit Books, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E.Escape from freedom. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, C. Women and witches: Patterns of analysis.Signs Winter, 1977,3 461–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gearhart, S. The lesbian and God-the-father.Radical religion Spring, 1974,1 18–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geis, G. Forcible rape: An introduction. In D. Chappell, R. Geis, & G. Geis (Eds.),Forcible rape. New York: Columbia University Press, 1977, p. 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, W.J. Why men resist. In B. Thorne & M. Yalom (Eds.),Rethinking the family. New York: Longman, 1982, p. 131–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, M. Toward a biology of menopause.Signs Summer, 1980,5 739–753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, L.Woman's body, woman's right: A social history of birth control in America. New York: Penguin Books, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, L., & Hunter, A. Sex, family, and the New Right: Anti-feminism as a political force.Radical America, November-February, 1978. 9–25.

  • Gouldner, A.For sociology. New York: Basic Books, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, M., & Bart, P. Taking the men out of menopause. In R. Hubbard, M.S. Henifin. & B. Fried (Eds.),Women look at biology looking at women. Boston: G.K. Hall, 1979, p. 163–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskell, M. Rape in the movies: Update on an ancient war.The Village Voice, October 8, 1979, p. 45.

  • Henning, C.M. Canon law and the battle of the sexes. In R.R. Ruether (Ed.),Religion and sexism. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1974, p. 267–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollway, W. Rape as a social problem.Social Problems October, 1981,25 75–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, M. Authority and the family. 1936. In Max Horkheimer,Critical theory: Selected essays. Translated by Mathew J. O'Connel. New York: Herder, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosken, F.P.The Hosken report: Genital and sexual mutilation of females. Lexington, MA: Women's International Network News, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houseknecht, S., & Pankhurst, J.G. The fate of alternative lifestyles in an era of “Pro-family” politics.Alternative Lifestyles 1983,5 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, W.The new right: a growing force in state politics. Conference on Alternative State and Local Policies, Washington, D.C., 1980.

  • Janeway, E. Who is Sylvia? On the loss of sexual paradigms.Signs 1980,5 573–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janus, N.Z. Research on sex-roles in the mass media: Toward a critical approach.Insurgent Socialist Summer, 1977,7 19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P., & Goodchilds, J.D. Pornorgraphy, sexuality and social psychology.Journal of Social Issues 1973,29 231–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, W.K.The family in classical Greece. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laeuchli, S.Power and sexuality: The emergence of canon law at the synod of Elvira. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laws, J.L.The second x: sex role and social role. New York: Elsevier, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leifer, M. Pregnancy.Signs Summer, 1980,5 754–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Limpus, L.Liberation of women: Sexual repression and the family. Boston: New England Free Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorber, J., Coser, R.L., Rossi, A.S., & Chodorow, N. On the reproduction of mothering: A methodological debate.Signs Spring 1981,6 482–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, C.A.Sexual harassment of working women. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, C.A. Feminism, Marxism, method, and the state: An agenda for theory.Signs Spring, 1982,7 515–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, H.Eros and civilization. Boston: Beacon, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M.K., & Voorhies, B.Female of the species. New York/London: Columbia University Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, T., & Obert, J.The fear brokers. New York: Pilgrim Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P.Y., & Fowlkes, M.R. Social and behavioral constructions of female sexuality.Signs 1980,5 783–800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millett, K.The basement: Meditations on a human sacrifice. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J.Women's estate. New York: Vintage, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. Psychoanalysis and feminism. New York: Pantheon, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D.H.J.Social theories and the family. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. Men, masculinity and the process of sociological enquiry. In H. Roberts (Ed.),Doing feminist research. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul. 1981, pp. 83–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. (Ed.) Theory and practice: Pornography and rape. In R. Morgan, (Ed.),Going too far: the personal chronicle of a feminist. New York: Vintage, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Faolaini, J., & Martines, L. (Eds.)Not in God's image: Women in history from the Greeks to the Victorians. New York: Harper & Row, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, J., & Scott, C. (Eds.)Religion and world history: A selection from the works of Christopher Dawson. New York: Image Books, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osmond, M.W. Cross-societal family research: A macrosociological overview of the seventies.Journal of Marriage and the Family November 1980,42 995–1016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osmond, M.W. Comparative marriage and the family.International Journal of Comparative Sociology September–December, 1981a,22 169–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osmond, M.W. Rethinking family sociology from a radical-critical perspective. Paper presented at the Theory and Methodology Workshop; annual meetings of the National Council on Family Relations October, 1981b.

  • Osmond, M.W.Radical theories and family analysis. Beverly Hills, California: Sage, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagels, E.H. What became of God the Mother?: Conflicting images of God in early Christianity.Signs Winter, 1976,2 293–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pankhurst, J.G. The ideology of “sex love” in postrevolutionary Russia.Alternative Lifestyles, 1982, p.5.

  • Pankhurst, J.G., & Houseknecht, S.K. The family, politics, and religion in the 1980s.Journal of Family Issues March, 1983,4 5–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Person, E.S. Sexuality as the mainstay of identity: Psychoanalytic perspectives.Signs 1980,5 605–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petchesky, R.P. Reproductive freedom: Beyond “a woman's right to choose.”Signs 1980,5 661–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy, S.B.Goddesses, whores, wives, and slaves: Women in Classical Antiquity. New York: Schocken Books, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, B.C. Angels in the devil's workshop: Women in nineteenth-century England and France. In R. Bridenthal and C. Koonz (Eds.),Becoming visible: Women in European history. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1977, p. 296–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, E.Medieval women. Edited by M.M. Postan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Red Collective.The politics of sexuality in capitalism. London: Cambridge University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, E.Woman's evolution: From motriarchal clan to patriarchal family. New York: Pathfinder Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, W.Character-analysis. 3rd Ed. New York: Humanities Press, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrlich-Leavitt, R. Women in transition: Crete and Sumer. In R. Bridenthal & C. Koonz (Eds.),Becoming visible: Women in European history. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1977, p. 36–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, V.M. Rape as a social problem.Social Problems, October, 1977,25 75–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, G. The traffic in women: Notes on the ‘political economy’ of sex. In R.R. Reiter (Ed.),Toward an anthropology of women. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1975, p. 157–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruether, R.R. Misogynism and virginal feminism in the fathers of the church. In R.R. Ruether (Ed.),Religion and sexism. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1974a, p. 150–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruether, R.R. (Ed.)Religion and sexism: images of women in the Jewish and Christian traditions. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1974b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruether, R.R.New woman/new earth. New York: Seabury Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, D.E.H.The Politics of rape. New York: Stein & Day, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanday, P.R.Female power and male dominance. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwendinger, J.R. & Schwendinger, H.Rape and Inequality. Beverly Hills, California: Sage, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scroggs, R. Paul and the eschatological woman.Journal of the American Academy of religion 1972,40 283–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, A.K. Sex and power: Sexual bases of radical feminism.Signs 1980,5 590–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, N.S.Forced labor. New York: Pergamon Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprey, J. On the institutionalization of sexuality.Journal of Marriage and the Family August, 1969,31 432–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski, A. Toward a radical sociology.Sociological Inquiry 1970,40 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tar, Z.The Frankfurt school. New York: John Wiley, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance, C.S. Gender systems, ideology, and sex research.Feminist Studies Spring, 19806 129–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeule, E.Greece in the bronze age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vicinus, M. (Ed.)Suffer and be still: Women in the Victorian age. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertz, R.W., & Wertz, D.C.Lying-in. New York: Free Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. Sexual Antagonism in Herefordshire. In D.L. Barker & S. Allen (eds.),Dependence and exploitation in work and marriage. New York: Longman, 1976, p. 169–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willetts, R.F.Everyday life in ancient Crete, New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, P.E.Learning to labor. Westmead, England: Saxon House, Teakfield Limited, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse, A. Sexuality, feminity and fertility control.Women's Studies Interntional Forum 1982,1(5), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooley, L.The Sumerians. New York: W.W. Norton, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Osmond, M.W. The politics of sexuality: Toward a radical-critical approach. J Fam Econ Iss 6, 48–70 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01083253

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01083253

Keywords

Navigation