Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative study of reactivity and agronomic effectiveness of Indian, US, African and Middle East rock phosphates for growing rice

  • Published:
Fertilizer research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Comparative reactivity and efficiency of eight Indian, six US, two African and one Middle East sources of rock phosphates for growing rice on laterite, red and alluvial soils under flooded conditions were evaluated in pot and laboratory experiments. When applied to moist aerobic soils, 15 days prior to flooding and transplanting rice, all the Indian sources were as poor as theno phosphate control in the three soil types, in respect of P availability in soil, grain yield response and P uptake by rice. North Carolina rock phosphate used in this study was as good as superphosphate in the laterite and red soils, but was also as poor as control in the black soil.

NH4 -citrate was found to interfere in the colorimetric determination of citrate soluble P by the vanado-molybdate colour method. A modified sulpho-molybdate-Sn Cl2 blue colour method could successfully be used to determine 2–8µg P in the presence of 0.02 to 0.2 meq NH4 -citrate, especially in rocks containing small amounts of citrate soluble P. All the Indian, as well as Idaho, Missouri and Tennessee rock phosphates were found to be less reactive as they contained much lower amounts of citrate extractable P in eight successive extracts as compared to North Carolina rock phosphate.

The cumulative citrate soluble P of 10 rock phosphates determined experimentally in eight successive extracts was significantly correlated with their reported a0 (length of ‘a’ axis of unit apatite crystal), mole ratio of CO3/PO4 or weight ratio of F/P2O5 of rocks. In the absence of X-ray and computer facilities, these regression equations were used to calculate the a0, CO3/PO4, F/P2O5, ACS, empirical formula and the apatite content of the unknown Indian rock samples. The Indian rock phosphates had a lower degree of CO3 and F substitution for PO4 in the apatite crystal, giving low ACS values and hence were less reactive. This might explain their lower efficiency for direct application for growing rice, obtained in the present experiment. These Indian rock phosphates had also lower apatite content. The use of the statistical method was limited to francolites alone. Scope for the use of this method for other unknown francolite rock phosphate samples has been discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chaudhury ML and Mishra B (1980) Factors affecting transformation of rock phosphates in soils. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 28, 295–301

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chien SH (1977) Dissolution of phosphate rocks in a flooded acid soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 41, 1106–1109

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chien SH and Hammond LL (1978) A comparison of various laboratory methods for predicting the agronomic potential of phosphate rocks for direct application. Soil Sci Soc Am J 42, 935–939

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chien SH and McClellan GH (1977) Variation in the apatite composition in phosphate rock and its relationship to rock's chemical reactivity in agronomic effectiveness. Paper presented at CLAMTROPS, Malaysia

  5. Engelstad OP (1971) Rock phosphates for flooded rice. Tennessee Valley Authority, Muscle Shoals, Alabama, USA. Preliminary Report

    Google Scholar 

  6. Engelstad OP, Getsinger JG and Stangel PJ (1972) Tailoring of fertilizers for rice. Tennessee Valley Authority, Muscle Shoals, Alabama, USA. Bull No Y-52

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jackson ML (1967) Soil Chemical Analysis, 1st edn. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India

    Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson FJ (1973) Technical aspects of fertilizer quality control. Tennessee Valley Authority, Muscle Shoals, Alabama, USA. Bull No Y-55

    Google Scholar 

  9. Khasawneh FE and Doll EC (1978) The use of phosphate rock for direct application to soils. Adv Agron 30, 159–206

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lehr JR and McClellan GH (1972) A revised laboratory reactivity scale for evaluating phosphate rocks for direct application. Tennessee Valley Authority, Muscle Shoals, Alabama, USA. Bull No Y-43

    Google Scholar 

  11. McClellan GH and Gremillion LR (1980) Evaluation of phosphatic raw materials. In Khasawneh FE et al, eds. The role of phosphorus in agriculture, pp. 43–79. Madison Wisc.: Soil Science Society of America

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sargngamath PA, Shinde BN and Patnaik S (1977) Effect of application of waterand citrate-soluble and insoluble phosphates on the transformation of inorganic P fractions and its relation with available P in different soils. Indian J Agric Sci 47, 307–313

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shinde BN, Sarangamath PA and Patnaik S (1978) Phosphorus transformations from rock phosphates in acid soils and measures for increasing their efficiency for growing rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant and Soil 49, 449–459

    Google Scholar 

  14. Terman GL, Allen SE and Engelstad OP (1970) Response by paddy rice to rates and sources of applied phosphorus. Agron J 62, 390–394

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dash, R., Mohanty, S. & Patnaik, S. Comparative study of reactivity and agronomic effectiveness of Indian, US, African and Middle East rock phosphates for growing rice. Fertilizer Research 3, 177–189 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01082977

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01082977

Key words

Navigation