Fertilizer research

, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp 111–125 | Cite as

The balance sheet approach to determination of phosphate maintenance requirements

  • J Karlovsky


A balance sheet model has been used to calculate the efficiency of phosphorus applied at stable levels of pasture production. This shows that P is used efficiently, with 70 to 90% of fertilizer and recycled P being utilized by plants. The remaining P not used by plants (10 to 30%) is lost due to chemical reactions or downward movement in the soil. Utilization efficiency declines as the maximum yield (in respect to P nutrition) is approached on any soil.

The fertilizer phosphate maintenance requirements of grasslands can be calculated on the basis of the efficiency of P utilization by pasture plants and the amount of P recycled in plant and animal residues at any stable P output, i.e. steady state. The amount of recycled P has been obtained by deducting from P uptake the amount of P removed in produce and lost by transfer under (a) dairy farming, and (b) cattle and sheep farming.

In this paper the phosphate maintenance requirements have been calculated for soils of low, medium and high production potential, each at 70 and 85% utilization at 90% of maximum production.

Key words

grasslands phosphorus maintenance model phosphorus utilization 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Blair GJ, Till AR and Smith RCG (1977) The phosphorus cycle — what are the sensitive areas? Rev in Rural Sci, Univ of New England, Armidale, N S W., Aust 3, 9–19Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bowden JW and Bennett D (1974) The ‘Decide’ model for predicting superphosphate requirements. Proc Phosphorus in Agric Symp, Aust Instit Agric Sci, Victorian Branch, Sec 6, 1–36Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brody S (1945) Bioenergetics and Growth. New York: Reinhold Publishing Corp, 1023 ppGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davies EB (1964) Losses of potassium and phosphorus. NZ Soil News 1, 46–50Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    During C (1972) Fertilisers and soils in New Zealand farming, 2nd ed. Wellington: Government Printer, 312 ppGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    During C and O'Connor M (1975) Fertilisers for New Zealand sheep and cattle farms. Proc Ruakura Farmers' Conf, 30–34Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elliott IL (1962) Presidential address. Proc NZ Grassl Assn Conf 24, 1–7Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Elliott IL and Lynch PB (1958) Techniques of measuring pasture production in fertiliser trials. NZ J Agric Res 1, 498–521Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fotyma M (1978) The principles of phosphate fertilisation. Phosphorus in Agric 72, 11–22Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Frissel MJ and Kolenbrander GJ (1977) The nutrient balances. Agro-Ecosystems 4, (1, 2), 277–292Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gillingham AG and During C (1973) Pasture production and transfer of fertility within a long established hill pasture. NZ J Exp Agric 1, 227–232Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gillingham AG, Tillman RW, Gregg PEH and Syers JK (1978) Uptake zones for phosphorus by pasture on differing strata within a hill paddock. NZ Soil News 26 (3), 75Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Holford ICR (1977) Factors affecting the accumulation and availability of residual fertiliser phosphate. Rev in Rural Sci, Univ of New England, Armidale, N S W, Aust 3, 41–45Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jackman RH (1955) Organic phosphorus in New Zealand soils under pasture: I. Conversion of applied phosphorus into organic forms. Soil Sci 79, 207–213Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Karlovsky J (1957) No benefit from subsurface placement of phosphatic fertilisers in pasture. NZ J Agric 95 (3), 245Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Karlovsky J (1961) Phosphate utilisation and phosphate maintenance requirements. Proc Ruakura Farmers' Conf, 142–151Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Karlovsky J (1962) Method of assessing the utilisation of phosphorus on permanent pastures. Trans Int Soc Soil Sci, Comm IV and V, 726–730Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Karlovsky J (1966) Assessing fertiliser maintenance requirements. NZ Agric Sci 1, 15–18Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Karlovsky J (1975) Phosphorus utilisation from solid and liquid fertilisers. NZ Fert J 45, 3–5Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Karlovsky J (1975) How much phosphate do we really need? NZ Agric Sci 9, 149–153Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Karlovsky J (1979) The efficiency of utilisation of P in superphosphate. NZ J Exp Agric 7, 331–336Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Karlovsky J (1981) Cycling of nutrients and their utilisation by plants in agricultural ecosystems. Agro-Ecosystems 7, 127–144Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Leamer RW (1963) Residual effects of phosphorus fertiliser on an irrigated rotation in the south west. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 27, 65Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lynch PB and Davies EB (1963) Topdressing of grasslands with phosphates and lime: III. Residual effects. NZ J Agric Res 7, 299–338Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Middleton KR (1976) How much phosphate do we really need? NZ Agric Sci 10, 41–43Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Middleton KR and Smith GS (1978) The concept of a climax in relation to the fertiliser input of a pastoral ecosystem. Plant and Soil 50, 595–614Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ozanne PG, Kirton DJ and Shaw TC (1961) The loss of phosphorus from sandy soils. Aust J Agric Res 12, 409–423Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ozanne PG and Shaw TC (1968) Advantages of the recently developed phosphate sorption test over the older extractant methods for soil phosphate. Trans 9th Int Cong Soil Sci 2, 273–280Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Peterburgsky AV (1977) Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in Soviet agriculture. Potash review 6, Subject 6, 42nd Suite, 1–5. International Potash Institute, BerneGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Quin BF and Rickard DS (1979) The long-term superphosphate requirement of irrigated pasture in Canterbury. 49th ANZAAS Conference, Abstr Vol I, 508Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Russell EW (1960) Sixty years of Saxmundham. 2. Problems still unsolved. Agriculture (London) 66, 431–435Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sadler JM and Stewart JWB (1974) Residual fertiliser phosphorus in western Canadian soils. Pub No 136, Sask Inst PedologyGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sokolov AV (1958) Supply of available soil phosphates and their accumulation when phosphorus fertilisers are applied. Sov Soil Sci 1, 117–123Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Spencer K and Govaars AG (1974) An assessment of the nutrient status of soils in north east Gippsland. Aust J Exp Agric Anim Husb 14, 85–92Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ulrich B (1977) Agro-ecosystems in Germany. Agro-Ecosystems 4 (1, 2), 97–106Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Watkinson JH (1969) The kinetics of ion exchange in soil. PhD thesis, Victoria University of WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Watkinson JH (1974) Phosphate fixation. Proc Ruakura Farmers' Conf, 212–213Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Widdowson JP and Rothbaum HP (1964) The use of red phosphorus as a fertiliser: part 3. NZ J Sci 7, 427–455Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wilson AT (1968) The chemistry underlying the phosphate problem in agriculture. Aust J Sci 31, 55–61Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wilson AT and Watkinson JH (1968) Availability of nutrients to plants. Trans Int Soil Sci Cong 2, 805–812Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk Publishers 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • J Karlovsky
    • 1
  1. 1.Ruakura Soil & Plant Research StationHamiltonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations