Skip to main content
Log in

Benjamin Rush and his friends on human nature

  • Articles
  • Published:
Psychiatric Quarterly Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The 18th century writers explored the nature of man and decided mankind was divided into six subdivisions. Studying man from a naturalistic viewpoint raised doubts about God's primary role, a questioning totally unacceptable to Benjamin Rush. Rush considered all of mankind as originating from God's original pair, but bearing a deficiency and vulnerability from their original sin. He viewed man as a physiologist, as a materialist, and as a monist. Modifying the Scottisch philosophers extensive faculty psychology, he accepted nine mental faculties and of these considered the moral sense essential. Rush and his friend, Thomas Jefferson, shared this belief which enabled them to be more optimistic than their friend John Adams who thought man to be driven by a need for distinction and thereby requiring control from a strong central government.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boorstin DJ:The Lost World of Thomas Jefferson. Boston, Beacon Press, 1960, pp. 101–102.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carlson ET: Benjamin Rush and mental health.Ann NY: Acad Sci 291:94–103, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cappon LJ, ed.:The Adams-Jefferson Letters. Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina Press, 1959, Vol. II, p. 324.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boorstin DJ: pp. 76–82.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boorstin DJ: p. 91.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D'Elia DJ: Dr. Benjamin Rush and the negro.J Hist Ideas 30:413–422, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boyd JP, ed.:The Papers of Thomas Jefferson. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1953, Vol. VIII, p. 186.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rush B:Lectures on Pathology (manuscript Yi 2, 7396, F 3 at the Library Company of Philadelphia.)

  9. Boorstin DJ: 114.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carlson ET, Simpson MM: The definition of mental illness: Benjamin Rush (1745–1813).Amer J Psychiat 121:209–214, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Noel PS, Carlson ET: The faculty psychology of Benjamin Rush.J Hist Behav Sci 9:369–377, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rush B:Sixteen Introductory Lectures. Philadelphia, Bradford and Innskeep, 1811, pp. 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Butterfield LH, ed:Letters of Benjamin Rush. Princeton, American Philosophical Society, 1951, Vol. I, p. 545.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carlson ET, Simpson MM: Benjamin Rush's medical use of the moral faculty.Bull Hist Med 39:22–33, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shaw P:The Character of John Adams. Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina Press, 1976, pp. 119, 55, 22, 26.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rush B:Lectures on Pathology.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Carlson ET, Wollock JL: Benjamin Rush on politics and human nature.JAMA 236:73–77, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Butterfield LH: p. 1019.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hawke DF:Benjamin Rush; Revolutionary Gadfly. Indianapolis, Bobbs-Merrill, 1971, p. 107.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rush B:Medical Inquiries and Observations. Philadelphia, J. Conrad, 1805, Vol. II, pp. 433–434.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hawke DF: p. 114.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carlson, E.T. Benjamin Rush and his friends on human nature. Psych Quart 51, 300–306 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01082833

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01082833

Keywords

Navigation