Advertisement

Behavior Genetics

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 621–632 | Cite as

Genetic basis for remating inDrosophila melanogaster. II. Response to selection based on the behavior of one sex

  • Mark H. Gromko
  • Mary Ellen A. Newport
Article

Abstract

Selection for fast and slow remating was carried out, with selection being based on the behavior of one sex. None of the male selection lines produced a significant response to selection, in lines selected either on the basis of the first male to mate with a female or on the basis of the second male to mate with a female. In contrast, three of four female selection lines showed significant responses to selection. Males in the female selection lines were tested for changes in their mating speed when paired with unselected females. These tests suggest that genes affecting remating speed in females are largely sex limited in their action. The gender difference in response to selection is discussed in terms of sexual selection theory.

Key Words

multiple mating sexual selection sex limitation sperm competition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bateman, A. J. (1948), Intra-sexual selection inDrosophila.Heredity 2:349–369.Google Scholar
  2. Falconer, D. S. (1981).Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, Longman, London.Google Scholar
  3. Fukui, H. H., and Gromko, M. H. (1988). Female receptivity to remating and early fecundity inDrosophila melanogaster (in preparation).Google Scholar
  4. Gilbert, D. G., Richmond, R. C., and Sheehan, K. B., (1981). Studies of esterase 6 inDrosophila melanogaster. VII. The timing of remating in females inseminated by males having active or null alleles.Behav. Genet. 11:195–208.Google Scholar
  5. Gromko, M. H., and Jensen, M. (1983). The effects of culture medium on productivity.Dros. Info. Serv. 59:46–47.Google Scholar
  6. Gromko, M. H., Newport, M. E. A., and Kortier, M. G. (1984). Sperm dependence of female receptivity to remating inDrosophila melanogaster.Evolution 38:1273–1282.Google Scholar
  7. Letsinger, J. T., and Gromko, M. H. (1985). The role of sperm numbers in sperm competition and female remating inDrosophila melanogaster.Genetica 66:195–202.Google Scholar
  8. Newport, M. E. A., and Gromko, M. H. (1984). The effect of experimental design on female receptivity to remating and its impact on reproductive success inDrosophila melanogaster.Evolution 38:1261–1272.Google Scholar
  9. Parker, G. A. (1970). Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects.Biol. Rev. 45:525–567.Google Scholar
  10. Parker, G. A. (1979): Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In Blum, M. S., and Blum, N. A. (eds.),Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Parker, G. A. (1983). Arms races in evolution—An ESS to the opponent-independent costs game.J. Theor. Biol. 101:619–684.Google Scholar
  12. Parker, G. A. (1984). Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating strategies. In Smith, R. L. (ed.),Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems, Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–60.Google Scholar
  13. Pyle, D. W., and Gromko, M. H. (1981): Genetic basis for remating inDrosophila melanogaster.Am. Nat. 117:133–146.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark H. Gromko
    • 1
  • Mary Ellen A. Newport
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesBowling Green State UniversityBowling Green

Personalised recommendations