Skip to main content
Log in

Selective sensitivity of the cat striate neurons to cruciform and angular figures of various orientations

  • Published:
Neurophysiology Aims and scope

Abstract

Selectivity and invariability of tuning were studied in 51 neurons of the primary visual cortex (area 17); cruciform and angular figures (CF and AF, respectively) of different configurations and orientations were presented in their receptive fields. Twenty-three neurons, or 45% of the studied cells, demonstrated selective sensitivity to these figures. Their responses considerably (2.38±0.36 times, on average) increased, as compared with those evoked by presentation of a single bar of preferred orientation. In the examined group, 2 cells demonstrated sensitivity both to the CF and AF. A wide range of detector properties related to the CF and AF analysis was found in the analyzed neuronal population. Detectors of configuration of these figures are described. Selective sensitivity to the angle between branches of these figures was observed in 17 neurons, and responses of 2 neurons among them showed invariability to orientation of these figures. Four cells were selective for orientation and were insensitive to configuration, and 4 other cells showed no specific sensitivity to either of these properties, but were sensitive to the appearance of a CF itself in their receptive field (these cells were regarded as invariant detectors of crossing nodes). Data inconsistent with the hierarchic principle of detection of the above properties are presented. Possible mechanisms and functional significance of selective sensitivity of striate neurons to the CF and AF are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. I. A. Shevelev, N. A. Lazareva, R. V. Novikova, et al., “Tuning for cruciform stimuli in visual cortex neurons of cat,”Neirofiziologiya/Neurophysiology,1, No. 5, 362–365 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  2. I. A. Shevelev, N. A. Lazareva, R. V. Novikova, et al., “Double orientation tuning of units in cat visual cortex,”Neuroscience,61, No. 4, 965–973 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  3. I. A. Shevelev, R. V. Novikova, N. A. Lazareva, et al., “Sensitivity to cross-like figures in the cat striate neurons,”Neuroscience,69, No. 1, 51–57 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  4. I. Fujita, K. Tanaka, M. Ito, and K. Cheng, “Columns for visual features of objects in monkey inferotemporal cortex,”Nature,360, No. 6402, 343–346 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. Sakai and Y. Miyashita, “Neural organization for the long-term memory of paired associates,”Nature,354, No. 6349, 152–155 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Marr and C. E. Hildreth, “A theory of edge detection,”Proc. Roy. Soc. Ser. B,204, 301–328 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. M. Zenkin and A. P. Petrov, “A system for analysis of images and identification of objects against the complex background,”Biofizika,12, No. 3, 493–501 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Hammond and D. P. Andrews, “Orientation tuning of cells in areas 17 and 18 of the cat's visual cortex,”Exp. Brain Res.,31, No. 3, 341–351 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. H. Henry, B. Dreher, and P. O. Bishop, “Orientation specificity of cells in cat striate cortex,”J. Neurophysiol.,37, No. 6, 1394–1409 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. H. Hubel and T. N. Wiesel, “Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex,”J. Physiol.,160, No. 1, 106–154 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. P. Scobey and A. J. Gabor, “Orientation discrimination sensitivity of single units in cat primary visual cortex,”Exp. Brain Res.,77, No. 2, 398–406 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. M. Buchanan-Smith and D. W. Heeley, “Anisotropic axes in orientation perception are not retinotopically mapped,”Perception,22, No. 12, 1389–1402 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. W. Heeley and H. M. Buchanan-Smith, “Recognition of stimulus orientation,”Vision Res.,30, No. 11, 1429–1437 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. D. Burns and R. Pritchard, “Geometrical illusions and the response of neurones in the cat's visual cortex to angle patterns,”J. Physiol.,213, No. 3, 599–616 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. H. S. Carpenter and C. Blakemore, “Interactions between orientations in human vision,”Exp. Brain Res.,18, No. 3, 287–303 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  16. E. S. Eriksson, “A field theory of visual illusions,”Br. J. Psychol.,61, No. 3, 451–466 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. H. Perkel and T. H. Bullock, “Neural coding,” in:Neurosci. Res. Symp., Summ. Vol. 6 (1969), pp. 405–527.

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. M. Ghose, R. D. Freeman, and I. Ohzawa, “Local intracortical connections in the cat's visual cortex: postnatal development and plasticity,”J. Neurophysiol.,72, No. 6, 1290–1303 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. Ben-Yishai, R. L. Bar-Or, and H. Sompolinsky, “Theory of orientation tuning in visual cortex,”Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,92, 3844–3848 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Neirofiziologiya/Neurophysiology, Vol. 27, No. 5/6, pp. 403–412, September–December, 1995.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lazareva, N.A., Shevelev, I.A., Novikova, R.V. et al. Selective sensitivity of the cat striate neurons to cruciform and angular figures of various orientations. Neurophysiology 27, 321–328 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01081911

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01081911

Keywords

Navigation