Abstract
This paper presents eight guidelines that educators should follow in developing and managing undergraduate individualized studies (contract learning-type) programs. The guidelines fall under the headings (1) supplying rationales, (2) focusing on the faculty, (3) assessing faculty performance, (4) assessing student readiness, (5) assessing the costs, (6) students as researchers, (7) how much academic credit, and (8) agents of change. A main theme presented is that the student-centered focus in individualized studies programs needs to be matched by an equal regard for the faculty member.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brown, D. G. The supreme role of faculty in planning: Why and how? InMore for less: Academic planning with faculty without new dollars. New York: Society for College and University Planning, 1975.
Chickering, A. W.A conceptual framework for educational alternatives at Empire State College. Saratoga Springs, N. Y.: Empire State College, 1976.
Cross, K. P.Beyond the open door. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1971.
Cross, K. P.Accent on learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1976, p. 112.
Cross, K. P., & Valley, J.Planning non-traditional programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1974, p. 1.
Feldman, K., & Newcomb, T.The impact of college on students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1969.
Johnson, J., & Peterson, H., University faculty and individualized education (mimeo). Faculty Development in Individualized Education Project, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, November 1976.
Knowles, M.Self-directed learning: A guide for teachers and learners. New York: Association Press, 1975.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johnson, J.N., Peterson, H.L. Developing and managing individualized studies programs: Some guidelines. Alternative Higher Education 2, 257–265 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01080154
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01080154