References
See J. Scarborough,Roman Medicine, Thames and Hudson, 1969, 56–57.
See, for example, G. Sharpe,The Law & Medicine in Canada, Butterworths, 1987, Ch. 11.
At p.11.
Per Lord Hailsham inD. v.N.S.P.C.C. [1978] A.C. 171 at 230 (a view which has not received universal agreement).
E.G.Belabel v.Air India [1988] 2 All E.R. 246.
Supra n.4.
Rogers v.Secretary of State for Home Dept. [1972] 2 All. E.R. 1057. Cf. Agar [1990]Crim. L.R. 183 and Langford [1990]Crim. L.R. 652
British Steel Corporation v.Granada T.V. [1981] A.C. 1096. Cf. In Re An Inquiry under the Company Securities (Inside Dealing) Act 1985 [1988] A.C. 660.
R.M. Unger, “The Critical Legal Studies Movement”, 96Harvard Law Review (1983), 563 at 597.
(1763) 19 St. Tr. 1153.
(1765) 19 St. Tr. 1029.
References
One of the leaders of the Critical Legal Studies Movement is R.M. Unger. A detailed analysis of his “The Critical Legal Studies Movement”, 96Harvard Law Review (1983), 563, is supplied by J.M. Finnis in his essay “On the Critical Legal Studies Movement”, in J. Eekelaar and J Bell, eds.,Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence, Clarendon Press, 1987, 145–165.
Finnis,op. cit. at 160.
Or black-letter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Salako, S.E., Lower, M.L.P. Book reviews. Liverpool Law Rev 15, 215–219 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01079921
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01079921