References
M. Brazier,Medicine, Patients and the Law, Penguin, 1992, 138.
R. v.Prentice and Another [1993] 4 All E.R. 935, C.A.
Ibid, at 949(b).
R. v.Adomako [1993] 4 All E.R. 935, C.A.
SeeAkerele v.R. [1943] A.C. 255.
R. v.Bateman (1925) 19 Cr.App.R. 8, CCA.
Ibid., at 11–12.
Sir Carleton Allen,Legal Duties, Clarendon Press, 1931, 233–234.
A. McCall-Smith, “Criminal Negligence and the Incompetent Doctor”, 1Medical Law Review (1993), 336.
R. v.Holloway [1993] 4 All E.R. 935, C.A., andsupra n.2 and 3.
R. v.Lawrence [1981] 1 All E.R. 974, [1982] A.C. 510.
R. v.Caldwell [1981] 1 All E.R. 961, [1982] A.C. 341.
For a commentary on this see A. Grubb, 1Medical Law Review (1993), 374–376.
R. v.Adomako [1994] 2 All E.R. 79; (1994) 99 Cr.App.R., 363, H.L.
Ibid., Cr.App.R. at 369.
Supra n. 9.
Ibid., at 349.
Supra n. 1 at 139.
The view of McCall-Smith,supra n. 9 at 338.
In June 1988 a woman was negligently given the entire contents of an oxygen cylinder so that she became inflated to resemble the “Michelin man” figure. The result was fatal. See D. Brahams, “Two Anaesthetists Convicted of Manslaughter”, 336The Lancet (1990), 430.
Ibid., at 431.
Ibid.
Yepremian v.Scarborough General Hospital (1980) 110 DLR (3d) 513 at 579 (Ont. CA).
D. Geisen,International Medical Malpractice Law, Mohr, 1988, 60–61, cited by Kirby J. inEllis v.Wallsend District Hospital (1989) 17 NSWLR 553 (NSW CA).
Ellis v.Wallsend, ibid.
Yepremian v.Scarborough General Hospital, supra n.23.
Seeobiter comments by Mustill L.J. and Browne-Wilkinson V-C., inWilsher v.Essex AHA (1987) Q.B. 730, [1986] 3 All E.R. 801, CA.
See I. Kennedy and A. Grubb,Medical Law, 2nd. ed., Butterworths, 1994, 400–415 and the controversialobiter statements made by Mustill L.J. in the recent case ofBull v.Devon AHA, 4Medical L.aw Review (1993), 117, with commentary by I. Kennedy in 1Medical Law Review (1993), 387–388.
See D. Hughes, “The Reorganisation of the NHS: The Rhetoric and Reality of the Internal Market”, 54Modern Law Review (1991), 88.
“NHS — Market Monster — Attack”,The Guardian, April 18th 1994, 2.
M. Douglas,Risk: Perceptions According to the Social Sciences, Routledge, 1986.
See Investigation into the Clapham Junction Rail Accident, The Hidden Report, HMSO, 1989; Investigation into the King's Cross Underground Fire,The Fennell Report, HMSO, 1988; Herald of Free Enterprise, Report of Court No. 8074,The Sheen Report, Dept. of Transport, 1987; and D. Bergman, “Recklessness in the Boardroom”,New Law Journal 140 (1990), 1496.
C. Wells, “Corporations: Culture, Risk and Criminal Liability”, [1993]Criminal Law Review, 551.
B. Fisse and J. Braithwaite, “The Allocation of Responsibility for Corporate Crime: Individualism, Collectivism and Accountability”, 11Sydney Law Review (1988), 468 at 476.
Supra n.33.
C. Wells,Corporations and Criminal Responsibility, Clarendon Press, 1994.
A. Vincent, “Can Groups be Persons?”, 42Review of Metaphysics, 678.
P. French,Collective and Corporate Responsibility, Oxford University Press, 1984.
S. Field and N. Jorg, “Corporate Liability and Manslaughter: Should We Be Going Dutch?”,Criminal Law Review (1991), 156 at 159.
Ibid., at 167–168.
Hospital Case, Rechtbank Leeuwarden, Dec. 23 1987, partially reported atNJ 1988, 981.
See McCall-Smith,supra n.9 at 349.
Tesco Supermarkets v.Nattrass (1972) A.C. 153.
Supra n.39 at 161–164.
Used inU.S. v.T.I.M.E.-D.C. Inc., 381 F.Sup 730 (WD Va 1974).
Supra n.39 at 162.
D.P.P. v.P. & O. European Ferries (Dover) Limited (1991) 93 Cr.App.R. 73.
The Sheen Report, supra n.32.
Ibid., at 14–16 and 23–25.
J.C. Smith and B. Hogan,Criminal Law, 7th ed., Butterworths, 1992, 184.
Ibid.
See M. Deans, “Hedley Byrne and the Eager Business Man”, 31Modern Law Review (1968), 322 at 328;Salmond on Torts, Sweet and Maxwell, 19th ed., 1967, 508;Fleming on Torts, Law Book Company, 1987, 7th ed., 603.
Supra n.2 and n.14.
The Law Commission, Consultation Paper No. 135, HMSO, April 1994.
Supra n. 9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harvey, A. Doctors in the dock: Criminal liability for negligent treatment resulting in the death of a patient. Liverpool Law Rev 16, 201–214 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01079814
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01079814