Skip to main content
Log in

Rethinking measures of migration: On the decomposition of net migration

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to “resurrect” the measure of net migration and defend its continued use under specific research circumstances, despite the current dissatisfaction with the measure as expressed by some scholars. We employ data from the 1980 Census of Population to compare five measures of migration, including net migration rates, in- and out-migration rates, migration efficiency ratios and migration turnover rates. We demonstrate the additivity of in- and out-migration rates with net migration rates and migration turnover rates. Also, we show how the migration efficiency ratio and turnover rates are conceptually and mathematically related. Finally, a simple multivariate model is estimated to show how regression coefficients from in-and out-migration rate models are related to net migration and migration turnover rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burr, A., Galle, O. R., and Fossett, M. A.: 1990, ‘The retrospective construction of metropolitan areas for longitudinal analysis: an application to racial occupational inequality’, Social Science Research 19, 250–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr, A., Galle, O. R., and Fossett, M. A.: 1991, ‘Racial occupational inequality in southern metropolitan areas, 1940–1980: revisiting the visibility discrimination hypothesis’, Social Forces 69, 831–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro, L. J. and Rogers, A.: 1983, ‘What the age composition of migrants can tell us’, Population Bulletin of the United Nations 15, 63–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisbie, W. P.: 1980, ‘Theory and research in Urban Ecology: Persistent Problems and Current Progress’, in Sociological Theory and Research: A Critical Appraisal H. M. Blalock, Jr. (ed) (Free Press, New York) pp. 203–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisbie, W. P. and Poston, D. K. Jr.: 1978, ‘Sustenance differentiation and population redistribution’, Social Force 57, 42–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galle, O. R. and Williams, M. W.: 1972, ‘Metropolitan migration efficiency’, Demography 9, 655–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M. J.: 1975a, ‘Research on internal migration in the United States: a survey’, Journal of Economic Literature 13, 397–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M. J.: 1975b, ‘Simultaneity bias in migration models: an empirical examination’, Demography 12, 519–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M. J.: 1981, Migration and Economic Growth in the United States: National Regional, and Metropolitan Perspectives (Academic Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M. J.: 1985, ‘Human migration: theory, models and empirical studies’, Journal of Regional Sciences 25, 521–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberson, S.: 1980, ‘The Interpretation of Net Migration Rates’, in Sociological Methodology, K. Schuessler (ed) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) pp. 176–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, L. L.: 1988, Migration and Residential Mobility in the United States (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, I. A.: 1966, Migration and Metropolitan Growth: Two Analytical Models (Chandler, San Francisco).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, P. A.: 1977, ‘The Functions and Dynamics of the Migration Process’, in Internal Migration: A Comparative Perspective, A. A. Brown and E. Neuberger (eds) (Academic Press, New York) pp. 61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueser, P. R. and White, M. J.: 1989, ‘Explaining the association between rates of in-migration and out-migration’, papers of the Regional Science Association 67, 121–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plane, D., Rogerson, P., and Rosen, A.: 1984, ‘The cross-regional variation of in-migration and out-migration’, Geographical Analysis 16, 162–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchey, P. N.: 1976, ‘Explanations of migration’, Annual Review of Sociology 2, 363–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, A.: 1990, ‘Requiem for the net migrant’, Geographical Analysis 22, 283–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shryock, H. S. Jr., Siegel, J. S., and Stockwell, E. G.: 1976, The Methods and Materials of Demography (Academic Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census: 1972, Census of Population: 1970. Volume I. Characteristics of the Population (USGPO, Washington, DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census: 1973, County and City Data Book, 1972 (a statistical abstract) (USGPO, Washington DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census: 1983, State and Metropolitan Area Data Book. (USGPO, Washington DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census: 1984, Geographic Mobility of Metropolitan Areas. Subject Report. Volume 2 (USGPO, Washington, DC).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 1987 annual meetings of the Population Association of America. We thank Jan E. Mutchler, Peter Rogerson, and the late Basil Zimmer for comments on a previous draft of the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Galle, O.R., Burr, J.A. & Potter, L.B. Rethinking measures of migration: On the decomposition of net migration. Soc Indic Res 28, 157–171 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01079656

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01079656

Keywords

Navigation