Abstract
In this paper we address the problem of determining whether adding independent risks or subdividing them is a good substitute for insurance. Despite the fact that accepting more i.i.d. risks increases total risk, it is shown that some risk-averse decision makers can rationally reduce their demand for insurance by doing so. Similarly, a better diversified portfolio of i.i.d. risky assets can rationally be more insured, even if diversification is a risk-reduction scheme. We derive conditions sufficient to obtain unambiguous comparative statics results. Assuming that absolute risk aversion is decreasing and that the fourth derivative of the utility function is positive, we show that diversification is an exceptionally good substitute for insurance. Under the same conditions, adding independent risks to wealth reduces the demand for insurance on each unit.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arrow, K.J. (1971). “The Theory of Risk Aversion.” InEssays of the Theory of Risk Bearing. New York: Elsevier, Chapter 3.
Chew, S.H., and L.G. Epstein. (1988). “The Law of Large Numbers and the Attractiveness of Compound Gambles,”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 125–132.
Dionne, G., L. Eeckhoudt, and C. Gollier. (1993). “Increases in Risk and Linear Payoffs,”International Economic Review, forthcoming.
Eeckhoudt, L., L. Bauwens, E. Briys, and P. Scarmure. (1991). “The Law of Large (Small?) Numbers and the Demand for Insurance,”Journal of Risk and Insurance 63, 438–451.
Eeckhoudt, L., C. Gollier, and T. Schneider. (1993). “Risk Aversion, Prudence and Temperance: A (more) Unified Approach,” manuscript.
Eeckhoudt, L., and M.S. Kimball. (1992). “Background Risk, Prudence and the Demand for Insurance.” In G. Dionne (ed.),Contributions to Insurance Economics. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hadar, J., and T.K. Seo. (1990). “The Effects of Shifts in a Return Distribution on Optimal Portfolios,”International Economic Review 31, 721–736.
Kihlstrom, R., D. Romer, and S. Williams. (1981). “Risk Aversion with Random Initial Wealth,”Econometrica 49, 911–920.
Kimball, M.S. (1990). “Precautionary Saving in the Small and in the Large,”Econometrica 58, 53–73.
Kimball, M.S. (1991). “Standard Risk Aversion,” NBER Technical Report 99.
Meyer, J., and M.B. Ormiston. (1985). “Strong Increases in Risk and Their Comparative Statics,”International Economic Review 26, 425–437.
Nielsen, L.T. (1985). “Attractive Compounds of Unattractive Investments and Gambles,”Scandinavian Journal of Economics 87, 463–473.
Pratt, J.W. (1964). “Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large,”Econometrica 32, 122–136.
Pratt, J.W., and R. Zeckhauser. (1987). “Proper Risk Aversion,”Econometrica 55, 143–154.
Rothschild, M., and J. Stiglitz. (1971). “Increasing Risk: II. Its Economic Consequences,”Journal of Economic Theory 3, 66–84.
Samuelson, P.A. (1963). “Risk and Uncertainty: A Fallacy of Large Numbers,”Scientia 98, 108–113.
Samuelson, P.A. (1967). “General Proof that Diversification Pays,”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 2, 1–13.
Samuelson, P.A. (1989). “The√N Law and Repeated Risktaking.” InProbability, Statistics and Mathematics: Papers in Honor of Samuel Karlin. Academic Press.
Weil, P. (1992). “Equilibrium Asset Prices with Undiversifiable Labor Income Risk,”Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 16, 769–790.
Wilson, R. (1968). “The Theory of Syndicates,”Econometrica 36, 119–132.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors thank Jack Meyer, a referee and the participants of the Risk Theory Seminar (Wharton School, 1993) for helpful comments and discussions.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eeckhoudt, L., Gollier, C. & Levasseur, M. The economics of adding and subdividing independent risks: Some comparative statics results. J Risk Uncertainty 7, 325–337 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01079631
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01079631