Abstract
Using the ‘addition of uncorrelated noise’ as a natural definition of increasing risk for multivariate lotteries, I interpret risk aversion as the willingness to pay a (possibly random) vector premium in exchange for a reduction in multivariate risk. If no restriction is placed on the sign of any co-ordinate of the vector premium then (as was the case in Kihlstrom and Mirman's (1974) analysis) only pairs of expected utility maximizers with thesame ordinal preferences for outcomes can be ranked in terms of their aversion to increasing risk. However, if we restrict the premium to be a non-negative random variable then comparisons of aversion to increasing risk may be possible between expected utility maximizers withdistinct ordinal preferences for outcomes. The relationship between their utility functions is precisely the multi-dimensional analog of Ross's (1981)global condition forstrongly more risk averse.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ambarish, R. and Kallberg, J. G.: 1987, ‘Multivariate Risk Premium’,Theory and Decision,22, 77–96.
Chew, S. H. and Epstein, L. G.: 1990, Nonexpected Utility Preferences in a Temporal Framework with an Application to Consumption-Savings Behaviour',J. Econ. Theory,50 (1), 54–81.
Demers, F. and Demers, M.: 1991, ‘Multivariate Risk Aversion and Uninsurable Risks: Theory and Applications’,The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory,16(1), 7–43.
Diamond, P. and Stiglitz, J.: 1974, ‘Increases in Risk and Risk Aversion’,J. Econ. Theory,8, 337–360.
Duncan, G. T.: 1977, ‘A Matrix Measure of Multivariate Local Risk Aversion’,Econometrica,45, 895–903.
Epstein, L. G.: 1988, ‘The Relation Between Utility and the Price of Equity’, Department of Economics, Working Paper No. 8808, University of Toronto.
Fishburn, P. C. and Vickson, R. G.: 1978, ‘Theoretical Foundations of Stochastic Dominance’, inStochastic Dominance, G. A. Whitmore and M. C. Findlay, Eds., Lexington Books, MA.
Karni, E.: 1979, ‘On Multivariate Risk Aversion’,Econometrica,47, 1391–1401.
Karni, E.: 1982, ‘Risk Aversion and Saving Behavior: Summary and Extension’,Int. Econ. Rev. 23(1), 35–42.
Karni, E.: 1989, ‘Generalized Expected Utility Analysis of Multivariate Risk Aversion’,Int. Econ. Rev. 30(2), 297–305.
Kihlstrom, R. and Mirman, L.: 1974, ‘Risk Aversion with Many Commodities’,J. Econ. Theory,8, 361–368.
Levhari, D., Paroush, J., and Peleg, B.: 1975, ‘Efficiency Analysis for Multivariate Distributions’,Rev. Econ. Stud., 87–103.
Machina, M.J.: 1982, ‘“Expected Utility” Analysis Without the Independence Axiom’,Econometrica,50, 277–323.
Machina, M. J. and Neilson, W. S.: 1987, ‘The Ross Characterization of Risk Aversion: Strengthening and Extension’,Econometrica,55, 1139–1149.
Paroush, J.: 1975, ‘Risk Premium with Many Commodities’,J. Econ. Theory,11, 283–286.
Pratt, J.: 1964, ‘Risk Aversion in the Large and the Small’,Econometrica,32, 122–136.
Ross, S.: 1981, ‘Some Stronger Measures of Risk Aversion in the Small and the Large’,Econometrica,49, 621–638.
Rothblum, U. G.: 1975, ‘Multivariate Constant Risk Posture’,J. Econ. Theory,10, 309–332.
Rothschild, M. and Stiglitz, J.: 1970, ‘Increasing Risk I: A Definition,J. Econ. Theory,2, 225–243.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grant, S. A strong (Ross) characterization of multivariate risk aversion. Theor Decis 38, 131–152 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01079497
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01079497