Skip to main content
Log in

Stochastic dominance in multicriterion analysis under risk

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditionally, in the literature on the modelling of decision aids one notes the propensity to treat expected utility models and outranking relation models as rivals. It may be possible, however, to benefit from the use of both approaches in a risky decision context. Stochastic dominance conditions can be used to establish, for each criterion, the preferences of a decision maker and to characterise them by a concave or convex utility function.

Two levels of complexity in preference elicitation, designated as clear and unclear, are distinguished. Only in the case of unclear preferences is it potentially interesting to attempt to estimate the value function of the decision maker, thus obtaining his (her) preferences with a reduced number of questions. The number of questions that must be asked of the decision maker depends upon the level of the concordance threshold that he(she) requires in the construction of the outranking relations using the ELECTRE method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow, K.J.: 1971, ‘Theory of Risk Aversion’, inEssays in the Theory of Risk Bearing, Ch. 3, Chicago: Markham Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawa, V.S.: 1975, ‘Optimal Rules for Ordering Uncertain Prospects’,Journal of Financial Economics 2, 195–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colson, G.: 1989, ‘MARS: A multiattribute Utility Ranking Support for Risk Situations with a P, Q, I, R, Relational Systems of Preference’,Math. Comput. Modelling 12, (10–11), 1269–1298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colson, G. and De Bruyn, C. (Eds.): 1989, ‘Models and Methods in Multiple Criteria Decision Making’ inModern Applied Mathematics and Computer Science Series, Rodin, E. (Gen. Ed.), Vol. 23, Pergamon.

  • D'Avignon, G.R. and Vincke, P.H.: 1988, ‘An Outranking Method Under Uncertainty’. E.J.O.R.36, 311–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dendrou, B.A.; Dendrou, S.A., and Houtis, E.N.: 1980, ‘Multiobjective Decisions Analysis for Engineering Systems’,Comput. & Ops. Res. 7, 301–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goicoechea, A., Duckstein, L., and Fogel, M.M.: 1979, ‘Multiple Objectives Under Uncertainty: An illustration Application of PROTRADE’,Water Resources Research 15(2), 203–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadar, J. and Russel, W.: 1969 ‘Rules for Ordering Uncertain Prospect’,American Economic Review 59, 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquet-LaGrèze, E.: 1977, ‘Modelling Preferences among Distributions using Fuzzy Relations’, in Jungermann, H. and Zeeuw, G. (Eds.),Decision Making and Change in Human Affairs, D. Reidel Publishing Company, pp. 99–114.

  • Keeney, R.L. and Raiffa, H.: 1976,Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, N.Y.: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeClercq, J.P.: 1982, ‘Stochastic Programming: An Interactive Multicriteria Approach’,E.J.O.R. 10, 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, H. and Sarnat, M.: 1984,Portfolio and Investment Selection: Theory and Practice, Prentice-Hall.

  • Mareschal, B.: 1986, ‘Stochastic Multicriteria Decision Making and Uncertainty’,E.J.O.R. 26, 58–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martel, J.M.: D'Avignon, G.R., and Couillard, J.: 1986, ‘A Fuzzy Relation in Multicriteria Decision Making’,E.J.O.R. 25, 258–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martel, J.M. and D'Avignon, G.R.: 1982, ‘Projects Ordering with Multicriteria Analysis’,E.J.O.R. 10, 59–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J.W.: 1964, ‘Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large’,Econometrica 3, 122–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B.: 1968, ‘Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples: la méthode ELECTRE’,RIRO No. 8, 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B. and Bouyssou, D.: 1993, ‘Aide Multicritère à la Décision: Méthodes et Cas,Economica.

  • Roy, B.: 1985, ‘Méthodologie multicritère d'aide à la décision’,Economica.

  • Saaty, T.L. and Vargas, L.G.: 1987, ‘Uncertainty and Rank Order in the Analytic Hierarchy Process’,E.J.O.R. 32, 107–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siskos, J. and Assimakopoulos, N.: 1989, ‘Multicriteria Highway Planning: a Case Study’,Math. Comput. Modelling, Colson, G. and De Bruyn, C. (Eds.),12, pp. 1401–1410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siskos, J.: 1983, ‘Analyse de systèmes de décision multicritère en univers aléatoire’,Foundations of Control Engineering 8(3–4), 193–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J.E.: 1970, ‘Review of some Aspects of Theory of Risk Bearing by K.J. Arrow’,Econometrica 38.

  • Teghem, J., Dufrane, D., Thauvoye, M. and Kunsch, P.: 1986, ‘STRANGE: An interactive Method for Multiobjective Linear Programming under Uncertainty’,E.J.O.R. 26, 65–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urli, B.: 1989,‘La programmation multicritère stochastique avec information incomplète’, Thèse de Doctorat, Faculté des sciences de l'administration, Université Laval.

  • Vincke, PH.: 1989,L'aide multicritère à la décision, Éditions de l'Université de Bruxelles, Collection SMA.

  • Whitmore, G.A.: 1870, ‘Third-Degree Stochastic Dominance’,Amer. Econ. Rev. 60, 457–459.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martel, JM., Zaras, K. Stochastic dominance in multicriterion analysis under risk. Theor Decis 39, 31–49 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01078868

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01078868

Key words

Navigation