Skip to main content
Log in

Equivalence problem for real-time strict deterministic pushdown automata

  • Published:
Cybernetics Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. S. Ginsburg and S. Greibach, “Deterministic context-free languages,” Inf. Control.,9, No. 6, 620–648 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Korenjak and J. Hopcroft, “Simple deterministic languages” in: Languages and Automata [Russian translation], Mir, Moscow (1975), pp. 71–96.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. McNaughton, “Parenthesis grammars,” J. ACM,14, No. 3, 490–500 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Rosenkrantz and R. E. Stearns, “Properties of deterministic top-down grammars,” Inf. Control. No. 3, 226–256 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. G. Valiant, Decision Procedures for Families of Deterministic Pushdown Automata, Report No. 7, Univ. of Warwick Computer Center (1973).

  6. L. G. Valiant, “The equivalence problem for deterministic finite-turn pushdown automata,” Inf. Control,25, No. 2, 123–133 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. G. Valiant and M. S. Paterson, “Deterministic one-counter automata,” J. Comput. Syst. Sci.,10, No. 3, 340–350 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  8. K. Taniguchi and T. Kasami, “A result on the equivalence problem for deterministic pushdown automata,” J. Comput. Syst. Sci.,13, No. 1, 38–50 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. V. Anisimov, “Syntactic properties of recursive program schemata,” Kibernetika, No. 3, 51–59 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  10. V. V. Zubenko, “On finite-turn pushdown automata,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk UkrSSR, Ser. A, No. 3, 838–841 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Linna, “Two decidability results for deterministic pushdown automata,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science,53, 365–373 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Oyamaguchi and N. Honda, “The decidability of equivalence for deterministic stateless pushdown automata, Inf. Control,38, No. 3, 367–376 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. P. Friedman and S. A. Greibach, “Superdeterministic DPDAs: the method of accepting does affect decision problems,” J. Comput. Syst. Sci.,19, No. 1, 79–117 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. A. Harrison and I. M. Havel, “Strict deterministic grammars,” J. Comput. Syst. Sci.,7, No. 3, 237–277 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. A. Harrison and I. M. Havel, “Real time strict deterministic languages,” SIAM J. Comput.,1, No. 4, 333–349 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. Ginsburg, The Mathematical Theory of Context-Free Languages, McGraw-Hill, New York (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. V. Anisimov, “Some subclasses of deterministic context-free languages,” Kibernetika, No. 4, 64–67 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  18. E. P. Friedman, “Equivalence problems for deterministic context-free languages and monadic recursion schemes,” J. Comput. Syst. Sci.,14, No. 3, 344–359 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  19. E. Ashcroft, Z. Manna, and A. Pnueli, “Decidable properties of single-argument functional schemes,” in: Languages and Automata [Russian translation], Mir, Moscow (1975), pp. 97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. V. Anisimov, “Formal grammars using external terminal contexts,” Kibernetika, No. 3, 81–88 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Oyamaguchi, N. Honda, and Y. Inagagi, Inf. Control45, No. 1, 90–115 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Kibernetika, No. 5, pp. 49–59, September–October, 1980.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Romanovskii, V.Y. Equivalence problem for real-time strict deterministic pushdown automata. Cybern Syst Anal 16, 689–700 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01078498

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01078498

Keywords

Navigation