Abstract
This study investigated the comprehension and production of reference terms in both sentences (Experiments 1 and 2) and texts (Experiments 3 and 4) using a sentence completion task. In Experiments 1 and 2, the use of a sentence-level strategy (subject assignment) was investigated. In Experiments 3 and 4, the use of a text-level strategy (topic assignment) was also investigated. There was a clear preference for continuing the sentences by referring to the subjects of the sentences regardless of the availability of gender cues, in both single sentences and in texts. There was also an influence of the topic of each text on both the choice of referent and the type of reference term used. However, the choice of reference term was affected by the number of potential antecedents in the preceding text. Overall, the results suggest that the sentence subject is a salient item in working memory. This salience is increased if the sentence subject is also the textual topic. In addition, it appears that the presence of a pronoun in a text triggers a specific strategy to assign the pronoun to the (salient) sentence subject.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, A., Garrod, S. C., & Sanford, A. J. (1983). The accessibility of pronominal antecedents as a function of episode shifts in narrative texts.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 427–440.
Broadbent, D. E. (1973).In defence of empirical psychology. London: Methuen.
Caramazza, A., Grober, E., Garvey, C., & Yates, J. (1977). Comprehension of anaphoric pronouns.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 601–609.
Caramazza, A., & Gupta, S. (1979). The roles of topicalization, parallel function and verb semantics in the interpretation of pronouns.Linguistics, 17, 497–518.
Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (1977). Reading comprehension as eyes see it. In M. A. Just & P. A. Carpenter (Eds.).Cognitive processes in comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Clancy, P. M. (1980). Referential choice in English and Japanese narrative discourse. In W. L. Chafe (Ed.),The pear stories: Vol. III. Advances in discourse processes. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Clark, H. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy. A critique of language statistics in psychological research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335–339.
Crawley, R. A. (1986). Some factors influencing the comprehension of pronouns. In C. Clifton (Ed.),Proceedings of the eighth annual conference of the cognitive science society. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ehrlich, K. (1980). Comprehension of pronouns.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 247–255.
Fletcher, C. R. (1981). Short-term memory processes in text comprehension.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 564–574.
Fletcher, C. R. (1986). Strategies for the allocation of short-term memory during comprehension.Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 43–58.
Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.),Surface dyslexia: Cognitive and neuropsychological studies of phonological reading. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Garrod, S. C., & Sanford, A. J. (1983). Topic dependent effects in language processing. In G. B. Flores d'Arcais & R. J. Jarvella (Eds.),The process of language understanding. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Garrod, S. C., & Sanford, A. J. (1985). On the real-time character of interpretation during reading.Language and Cognitive Processes, 1, 43–59.
Garrod, S. C., & Sanford, A. J. (1988). Thematic subjecthood and cognitive constraints on discourse structure.Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 519–534.
Grober, E. H., Beardsley, W., & Caramazza, A. (1978). Parallel function strategy in pronoun assignment.Cognition, 6, 117–133.
Haviland, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1974). What's new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 512–521.
Hirst, W., & Brill, G. A. (1980). Contextual aspects of pronoun assignment.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 168–175.
Hobbs, J. R. (1976).Pronoun Resolution (Res. Rep. 76-1). New York: City University of New York, Department of Computer Sciences, City College.
Hornby, P. A. (1972). The psychological subject and predicate.Cognitive Psychology, 3, 632–642.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1968). The interpretation of the passive voice.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 69–73.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1980). Psychological processes underlying pronominalization and non-pronominalization in children's connected discourse. In J. Kreiman & A. E. Ojeda (Eds.),Papers from the parasession on pronouns and anaphora. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Kieras, D. E. (1979).The relation of topics and themes in naturally occurring technical paragraphs. (Tech. Rep. 1). Tucson: University of Arizona.
Kieras, D. E. (1980). Initial mention as a signal to thematic content in technical passages.Memory and Cognition, 8, 345–353.
Kieras, D. E. (1981). The role of major referents and sentence topics in the construction of passage macrostructure.Discourse Processes, 4, 1–15.
Kozminsky, E. (1977). Altering comprehension: The effects of biasing titles on text comprehension.Memory and Cognition, 5, 482–490.
Maratsos, M. P. (1973). The effects of stress on the understanding of pronominal coreference in children.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2, 1–8.
Marsh, G., Friedman, M., Welch, V., & Desberg, P. (1981). A cognitive-developmental theory of reading acquisition. In G. E. Mackinnon & T. G. Waller (Eds.),Reading research: Advances in theory and practice. New York: Academic Press.
Perfetti, C. A., & Goldman, S. R. (1974). Thematization and sentence retrieval.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 70–79.
Perfetti, C. A., & Goldman, S. R. (1975). Discourse functions of thematization and topicalization.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 4, 257–271.
Purkiss, E. (1978).The effect of foregrounding on pronominal reference. Unpublished undergraduate thesis, Glasgow University, Glasgow, Scotland.
Rondal, J. A., Brédart, S., Leyen, N., Neuville, P., & Péree, F. (1984). Coreference and parallel function strategy for the ambiguous anaphoric pronouns.Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 4, 151–170.
Sanford, A. J., & Garrod, S. C. (1981).Understanding written language: Explorations in comprehension beyond the sentence. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Sanford, A. J., Moar, K., & Garrod, S. C. (1988). Proper names as controllers of discourse focus.Language and Speech, 31, 43–56.
Sheldon, A. (1974). The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 272–281.
Stevenson, R. J., & Vitkovitch, M. (1986). The comprehension of onophoric relations.Language and Speech, 29, 335–360.
Winer, B. J. (1970).Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Zubin, D. A. (1979). Discourse function of morphology: The focus system in German. In T. Givón (Ed.),Syntax and semantics: vol. 12. New York: Academic Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work is based on a doctoral dissertation submitted by R. A. Crawley to the University of Durham and supported by the Medical Research Council of Great Britain.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Crawley, R.A., Stevenson, R.J. Reference in single sentences and in texts. J Psycholinguist Res 19, 191–210 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01077416
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01077416