Abstract
Is class inclusion (hyponymy) a more primitive or simpler semantic relation than synonymy? This question was addressed by comparing the time required to identify examples of the two relations in a semantic decision task. In two experiments subjects made truelfalse decisions about statements of the form “An A is a B.” In Experiment 1 category-member and synonym pairs were randomly intermixed; there was no difference between the two relations. In Experiment 2 one group was presented with the two relations randomly intermixed, as in Experiment 1 (mixed condition), while two other groups were each presented with just one of the relations (separate condition). In the separate condition responses were faster to class inclusion than to synonym pairs, while in the mixed condition there was no difference, as in Experiment 1. The results suggest that class inclusion may be a simpler relation than synonymity, although the difference may simply reflect the use to which the two relations are put in common use. The fact that the difference occurred in the separate but not in the mixed conditions suggests that the latencies reflected the evaluation of the relations against a decision criterion rather than directly reflecting lexical organization or everyday usage.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J. R. (1976):Language, memory, and thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Beckwith, R., Fellbaum, C., Gross, D., & Miller, G. A. (1990).WordNet: A lexical database organized on psycholinguistic principles, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, Cognitive Science Laboratory, Report No. 42.
Bolinger, D. (1965). The atomization of meaning.Language, 41, 555–573.
Chaffin, R. (1981). Context effects in the categorization task.Journal of General Psychology, 104, 293–302.
Chaffin, R., & Herrmann, D. J. (1987). Relation element theory: A new account of the representation and processing of semantic relations. In D. Gorfein & R. Hoffman (Eds.)Learning and memory: The Ebbingaus Centennial Conference. (pp. 221–245). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Chaffin, R., & Herrmann, D. J. (1988). Effects of relation similarity on part-whole decisions.Journal of General Psychology, 115, 131–139.
Chaffin, R., Herrmann, D. J., & Winston, M. E. (1988). An empirical taxonomy of part-whole relations: Effects of part-whole relation type on relation identification.Language and Cognitive Processes, 3, 17–18.
Chang, T. M. (1986). Semantic memory: Facts and models.Psychological Bulletin, 99, 199–220.
Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing.Psychological Review, 82, 407–428.
Conrad, C. (1972). Cognitive economy in semantic memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 92, 149–154.
Forster, K. I., & Dickinson, R. G. (1976). More on the language as fixed effect fallacy: Monte Carlo estimates of error rates forF 1,F 2, andmin F'.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 135–142.
Glass, A. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1975). Alternative conceptions of semantic memory.Cognition, 3, 313–319.
Gross, D., Fischer, U., & Miller, G. A. (1989). The organization of adjectival meaning.Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 92–106.
Gruenenfelder, T. M. (1986). Relational similarity and context effects in category verification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 587–599.
Herrmann, D. J. (1978). An old problem for the new psychosemantics: Synonymity.Psychological Bulletin, 85, 490–512.
Herrmann, D. J., & Chaffin, R. (1986). Comprehension of semantic relations as a function of definitions of relations. In F. Klix (Ed.)Learning and memory. (pp. 311–319). Berlin: North-Holland.
Herrmann, D. J., Chaffin, R., Conti, G., Peters, D., & Robbins, P. H. (1979). Comprehension of antonymy: The generality of categorization models.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 585–597.
Herrmann, D. J., Chaffin, R., Daniel, M. P., & Wool, R. S. (1986). The role of elements of relation definitions in antonym and synonym comprehension.Zeitschrift fur Psychologie, 194, 134–153.
Herrmann, D. J., Chaffin, R., & Winston, M. E. (1986). “Robins are a part of birds”: The confusion of semantic relations.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 24, 413–415.
Holyoak, K. J., & Glass, A. L. (1975). The role of contradictions and counterexamples in the rejection of false sentences.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 215–239.
Hume, D. (1965).A treatise of human nature. L. A. Selby Bigge (Ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Original published 1739).
Johnson-Laird, P. N., Herrmann, D. J., & Chaffin, R. (1984). Only connections: A critique of semantic networks.Psychological Bulletin, 96, 292–315.
Klix, F., & van der Meer, E. (1980). The method of analogy recognition for the determination of semantic relations in long-term memory. In F. Klix & J. Hoffmann (Eds.)Cognition and memory. (pp. 145–152). Berlin: North-Holland.
Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Kunzendorf, R. G. (1976). Selected features of word meaning.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 633–640.
Lorch, R. F., Jr. (1981). Effects of relation strength and semantic overlap on retrieval and comparison processes during sentence verification.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 593–610.
Lyons, J. (1977).Semantics. Volume I. London: Cambridge University Press.
McCloskey, M., & Glucksberg, S. (1979). Decision processes in verifying category membership statements: Implications for models of semantic memory.Cognitive Psychology, 11, 1–37.
Miller, G. A. (1990). Inheritance systems (unpublished manuscript).
Miller, G. A., & Charles, W. (1990). Contextual correlates of semantic similarity (in preparation).
Miller, G. A., & Fellbaum, C. (1990). Semantic networks of English.Cognition (in press).
Miller, G. A., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1976).Language and perception, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Norman, D. A., Rumelhart, D. E., & the LNR Group (1975).Explorations in cognition. San Francisco: Freeman.
Poltrock, S. E., & Foltz, G. S. (1982). An experimental psychology laboratory system for the Apple II microcomputer.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 14, 103–108.
Schank, R. C. (1972). Conceptual dependence: A theory of natural language understanding.Cognitive Psychology, 3, 552–631.
Smith, E. E., Shoben, E. J., & Ripps, L. J. (1974). Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model of semantic decisions.Psychological Review, 81, 214–241.
Whitten, II, W. B., Suter, N., & Frank, M. L. (1979). Bidirectional synonym ratings of 464 noun pairs.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 109–127.
Wilkins, A. J. (1971). Conjoint frequency, category size, and categorization time.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 382–885.
Winston, M. E., Chaffin, R., & Herrmann, D. J. (1987). A taxonomy of part-whole relations.Cognitive Science, 11, 417–444.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chaffin, R., Glass, A. A comparison of hyponym and synonym decisions. J Psycholinguist Res 19, 265–280 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01077260
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01077260