Abstract
Four representational systems are examined with respect to their adequacy for representing reasoning processes within kinship systems; the systems are associative, semantic feature, logical predicate, and an “algebraic” one based on set mappings. The associative and semantic feature systems are shown to be inadequate, and the logical predicate system is shown to be somewhat clumsy and unintuitive. The algebraic is proposed as the correct representation of kinship terms. It is suggested that certain other conceptual domains can also be best represented by an algebraic system.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Romney, A. K., and D'Andrade, R. G. (1964). Cognitive aspects of English kin terms. In Romney, A. K., and D'Andrade, R. G. (eds.), Transcultural Studies in Cognition.Am. Anthropologist 66(3): 146–170 (Part 2).
Slobin, D. I. (1971).Psycholinguistics, Scott, Foresman, Glenview, Ill.
Wallace, A. F. C., and Atkins, J. (1960). The meaning of kinship terms.Am. Anthropologist 62: 58–79.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by the Advanced Research Projects Agency of the Department of Defense, and was monitored by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research under contract #F 44620-73-C-00 56.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Winkelman, J.H. Semantic representation of Kinship systems. J Psycholinguist Res 4, 133–140 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01077033
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01077033