Skip to main content
Log in

Computerized assessment of verbal skill

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes a computerized diagnostic test for the assessment of basic literacy skills in Dutch. Central in this test is a skill labeledword image, referring to the subject's implicit knowledge of orthographic structure. Test norms were obtained in a group of reference subjects. The most notable trend found in the standardization study was that the development of word image performance showed a nonlinear, U-shaped trend. Two case studies are reported. A supplementary validation study, based on test data collected from standard reference groups of normal and poor readers, demonstrated that word image performance is significantly related to between-group differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Assink, E. M. H. (1987). Algorithms in spelling instruction: The orthography of Dutch verbs.Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 228–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowerman, M. (1982). Starting to talk worse: Clues to language acquisition from children's late speech errors. In. S. Strauss (Ed.),U-shaped behavioral growth. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowerman, M. (1985). Beyond communicative adequacy: From piecemeal knowledge to in integrated system in the child's acquisition of language. In K. E. Nelson (Ed.),Children's language (Vol. 5), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowey, J. A. (1986a). Syntactic awareness and verbal performance in relation to reading skill and ongoing reading comprehension monitoring.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 282–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowey, J. A. (1986b) Syntactic awareness and verbal performance from preschool to fifth grade.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 15, 285–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brus, B. Th., & Voeten, M. (1972).Eén minuut test [One-minute test]. Nijmegen: Berkhout.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C., & Wilce, L. S. (1979). Does word training increase or decrease interference on a Stroop task?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 27, 252–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C., & Wilce, L. S. (1983). Development of word identification speed in skilled and less skilled beginning readers.Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 3–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, F. W., Shankweiler, D. & Liberman, I. Y. (1985). Spelling proficiency and sensitivity to word structure.Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 423–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H., & Winner, E. (1982). First intimations of artistry. In S. Straus (Ed.),Ushaped behavioral growth. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gombert, J. E. (1992).Metalinguistic development. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, L., & Chard, J. (1980). The reader's implicit knowledge of orthographic structure. In U. Frith (Ed.),Cognitive processes in spelling. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1985). Language and cognitive processes from a developmental perspective.Language and Cognitive Processes, 1, 61–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1987). Function and process in comparing language and cognition. In M. Hickmann (Ed.),Social and functional approaches to language and thought. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klima, E. S. (1972). How alphabets might reflect language. In J. F. Kavanagh & I. Mattingly (Eds.),Language by ear and by eye. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schadler, M., & Thissen, D. M. (1981). The development of automatic word recognition and reading skill.Memory and Cognition, 9, 132–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.Psychological Review, 96, 523–568.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stavy, R., Strauss, S., Orpaz, N., & Carmi, G. (1982). U-shaped behavioral growth in ratio comparisons. In S. Straus (Ed.),U-shaped behavioral growth. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, S. (1982). Introduction. In S. Straus (Ed.),U-shaped behavioral growth. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (1985). Are there qualitative differences in reading behavior between dyslexics and normal readers?Memory and Cognition, 13, 357–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunmer, W. E., Nesdale, A. R., & Wright, A. D. (1987). Syntactic awareness and reading acquisition.British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5, 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F. R., & Scanlon, D. M. (1982). Verbal processing in poor and normal readers. In C. J. Brainerd & M. Pressley (Eds.),Verbal processes in children: Progress in cognitive development research. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young-Loveridge, J. M. (1985). Use of orthographic structure and reading ability: What develops?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 40, 439–449.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Assink, E., Kattenberg, G. Computerized assessment of verbal skill. J Psycholinguist Res 22, 427–444 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01074345

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01074345

Keywords

Navigation