Skip to main content
Log in

A graph theory model of the semantic structure of attitudes

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The semantic structure underlying the attitudes of pretreatment and posttreatment drug addicts was modeled using a network analysis of free word associations. Measures of graph theoretic properties were used to assess structural differences in the associative networks of the two populations. These measures modeled the information processes of associative networks proposed in the spreading activation theory of semantic processing. As expected based on graph theory, the structure of the associative networks of post-treatment subjects was more dense, less constrained, and more hierarchically organized by the self concept. In a test of the network model, the subjects' evaluations of concepts in the associative network were found to be a function of their evaluations of semantically similar concepts. Although preliminary and limited, the results suggest that graph theory may provide a broad mathematical foundation for diverse models of cognitive systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. R. (1983).The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brook, J. S., Whiteman, M., Gordon, A. S., & Cohen, P. (1986). Some models and mechanisms for explaining the impact of maternal and adolescent characteristics on adolescent stages of drug use.Developmental Psychology, 22(4), 460–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. T., & Stanners, R. F. (1983). The assessment and modification of concept interrelationships,Journal of Experimental Education, 52, 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr, A. (1984). The ideologies of despair: A symbolic interpretation of punks' and skinheads' usage of barbiturates.Social Science and Medicine, 19(9), 929–938.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1980). Network models of structure.Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 79–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1982).Toward a structural theory of action: Network models of social structure, perception, and action. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1983). Range. In R. S. Burt & M. I. Minor, (Eds.),Applied network analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1992a).STRUCTURE, Version 4.2. New York: Columbia University Center for the Social Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1992b).Structural holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981).Attention and self-regulation: A control theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cipolli, C., & Galliani, I. (1990). Addiction time and value of Z indicators in Rorschach of heroin users.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 70, 1105–1106.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1976). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing.Psychological Bulletin, 82, 407–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, R. J. (1988). Psychological functioning of cocaine and free basers derived from objective tests.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44(4), 599–606.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn W. N., & Ginsberg, A. (1986). A sociocognitive network approach to organizational analysis.Human Relations, 40, 955–976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdley, C. A., & D'Agostine, P. R. (1989). Cognitive and affective components of automatic priming effects.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 741–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, R. H., Sabonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229–238.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodkin, K., & Wilson, K. E. (1982). Amenability of opiate addicts on probation or parole.International Journal of the Addictions, 17(6), 1047–1053.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harary, F. (1969).Graph theory. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T., Rohles, W. S. & Jones, C. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine (1990).Report of the committee for substance abuse coverage. Washington, D.C.: author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judd, C. M., Drake, R. A., Downing, J. W., & Krosnick, J. A. (1991). Some dynamic properties of attitude structures: Context induced response facilitation and polarization.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 193–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, G. A. (1955).The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, S. B., & Loftus, J. (1988). The nature of self referent encoding The contributions of elaborative and organizational processes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoke, D., & Burt, R. S. (1983). In R. S. Burt, & M. J. Minor, (Eds.),Applied network analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Mongillo, M. (1992). The nature of conceptual similarity schemata: Examination of some basic assumptions.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(1), 88–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krackhardt, D. (1987). Cognitive social structures.Social Networks, 9, 109–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labouvie, E. W., & McGee, C. R. (1986). Relation of personality to alcohol and drug use in adolescence.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54(3), 289–293.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lunt, P. K. (1991). The perceived causal structure of loneliness.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(1), 26–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. (1977). Self schemata and processing information about the self.Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self concept: A social psychological perspective.Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, W. J. (1990). Dynamic operations of thought systems.American Psychologist, 45(4), 504–512.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miyamoto, W., Suga, S., & Oi, K. (1990). Methods of digraph representation and cluster analysis for analyzing free association.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 20(3), 695–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957).The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, R. C., & Mitchell, S. (1986). A comparative study of the attitudes of college students and drug treatment center residents toward drugs, other drug users, and themselves,Journal of Offender Counseling, Services, and Rehabilitation, 10, 83–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peak, H. (1958). Psychological structure and psychological activity.Psychological Review, 65, 325–347.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quillan, M. R. (1969). The teachable language comprehender.Communication of the ACM, 12, 639–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L. (1990). Implicit memory: Retention without remembering.American Psychologist, 45(9), 1043–1056.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. M., & Chipman, S. (1970). Second order isomorphism of internal representations.Cognitive Psychology, 1, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffenhagen, R. A., Polich, J. M., & Lash S. (1978). Alienation, delinquency, and patterns of drug use.International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 24(2), 125–137.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Svanum, S., & Schladenhauffen, J. (1986). Lifetime and recent alcohol consumption among male alcoholics: Neuropsychological implications.Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 174, 214–220.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Szalay, L. B., & Brent, J. (1967). The analysis of cultural meanings through free verbal associations.Journal of Social Psychology, 72, 161–187.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Szalay, L. B., & Bryson, J. A. (1973). The measurement of psychocultural distance: A comparison of American blacks and whites.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 166–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szalay, L. B., & Bryson, J. A. (1974). Psychological meaning: Comparative analyses and theoretical implications.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 166–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szalay, L. B., & Deese, J. (1978).Subjective meaning and culture: An assessment through word associations. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum/Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesser, A., & Shaffer, D. R. (1990). Attitudes and attitude change.Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 479–523.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, E. C. (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men.Psychology Review, 55, 189–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau, R., & Rasinski, K. A. (1988). Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement.Psychological Bulletin, 103, 299–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicklund, R. A., & Frey, D. (1980). Self-awareness theory: When the self makes a difference. In D. M. Wegner & R. R. Vallacher (Eds.),The self in social psychology (pp. 31–54). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research was funded by a grant from the National Institute for Drug Abuse to the Institute of Cultural Studies, Inc.

Daytop Village.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bovasso, G., Szalay, L., Biase, V. et al. A graph theory model of the semantic structure of attitudes. J Psycholinguist Res 22, 411–425 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01074344

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01074344

Keywords

Navigation