Skip to main content
Log in

Developmental isolation and subsequent adult behavior ofDrosophila paulistorum. I. Survey of the six semispecies

  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present results deriving from the inception of an investigation (involving 4,000 scored matings) into the development of discriminatory behavior inDrosophila paulistorum. We examined two complementary situations for their effects on mating behavior: physical isolation (seclusion) beginning at each of six developmental stages and exposure to heterosemispecifics during all preadult stages (mixed culturing). Preadult seclusion at certain stages decreased sexual isolation between three of four semispecific pairs. Seclusion effect, or lack thereof, varied with semispecies and with the stage at which seclusion was imposed: the earlier the stage at which seclusion was initiated, the more drastic the effect. In contrast, mixed culturing increased sexual isolation between the one pair of semispecies that was tested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carson, H. L., and Templeton, A. R. (1984). Genetic revolutions in relation to speciation phenomena: The founding of new populations.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15:97–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Th. (1970).Genetics of the Evolutionary Process, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L. (1989). Effects of lifelong experience on the rare-male mating advantage inDrosophila pseudoobscura.Behav. Genet. 19:755–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L. (1990). Developmental isolation and subsequent adult behavior ofDrosophila pseudoobscura.Behav. Genet. 20:609–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L., and Powell, J. (1982). TheDrosophila willistoni species group. In Ashburner, M., Carson, H. L., and Thompson, J. N., Jr. (eds.),The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila,Vol. 3b, Academic Press, New York, pp. 193–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L., Somerson, N., and Gottlieb, F. J. (1986). Reproductive isolation in a neotropical inect: Behavior and microbiology. In Huettel, M. (ed.),Evolutionary Genetics of Invertebrate Behavior: Progress and Prospects, Plenum, New York, pp. 97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elens, A. A., and Wattiaux, J. M. (1964). Direct observation of sexual isolation.Dros. Info. Serv. 39:118–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eoff, M. (1973). The influence of being cultured together on hybridization betweenDrosophila melanogaster andDrosophila simulans.Am Nat. 107:247–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, D. G., and Starmer, W. T. (1985). Statistics of sexual isolation.Evolution 39:1380–1383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koepfer, H. R., and Fenster, E. (1991). Asymmetrical mating patterns between geographic strains ofDrosophila mercatorum. A test of the Kaneshiro hypothesis.Evolution 45:455–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, D. M. (1984). Specific-mate-recognition systems, phylogenies and asymmetrical evolution.J. Theor. Biol. 109:147–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, D. M., and Paterson, H. E. H. (1984). On bridging the gap between race and species: The isolation concept and an alternative.Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 107:501–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malogolowkin-Cohen, C., Simmons, A. S., and Levene, H. (1965). A study of sexual isolation between certain strains ofDrosophila paulistorum.Evolution 19:95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markow, T. A. (1991). Sexual isolation among populations ofDrosophila mojavensis.Evolution 45:1525–1529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markow, T. A., Quaid, M., and Kerr, S. (1978). Mating experience and competitive courtship success inDrosophila melanogaster.Nature 267:821–822.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, A. E. (1961).Analyzing Qualitative Data, Halsted Press, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, H. J. (1942). Isolating mechanisms, evolution and temperature.Biol. Symp. 6:71–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Hara, E., Pruzan, A., and Ehrman, L. (1976). Ethological isolation and mating experience inDrosophila paulistorum.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA. 73:975–976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruzan, A. (1976). Effects of age, rearing and mating experiences on frequency dependent sexual selection inDrosophila pseudoobscura.Evolution 30:130–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruzan, A., and Ehrman, L. (1974). Age, experience, and rare male advantages inDrosophila pseudoobscura.Behav. Genet. 4:159–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruzan, A., Applewhite, P., and Bucci, M. (1977). Protein synthesis inhibition altersDrosophila mating behavior.Pharm. Biochem. Behav. 6:355–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruzan, A., Ehrman, L., Perelle, I., and Probber, J. (1979). Sexual selection,Drosophila age and experience.Experientia 35:1023–1024.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, R., and Ehrman, L. (1974). The incidence of repeated mating in the superspeciesD. paulistorum.Experientia 30:489–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringo, J. M., Dowse, H. B., and Lagasse, S. (1986). Symmetry versus asymmetry in sexual isolation experiments.Evolution 40:1071–1083.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S. (1956).Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, R. W., Hall, J. C., Gailey, D. A., and Kyriacou, C. P. (1984). Genetic elements of courtship inDrosophila: Mosaics and learning mutants.Behav. Genet. 14:383–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spieth, H. T., and Ringo, J. (1983). Mating behavior and sexual isolation inDrosophila. In Ashburner, M., Carson, H. L., and Thompson, J. M., Jr. (eds.),The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, Academic Press, New York, pp. 223–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins, L., and Hall, J. C. (1981). The different effects on courtship of volatile compounds from mated and virginDrosophila females.J. Insect Physiol. 27:17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard, M. J. (1983). Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation.Q. Rev. Biol. 58:155–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar, J. H. (1974).Biostatistical Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zawistowski, S., and Richmond, R. C. (1985). Experience-mediated courtship reduction and competitive for mates by maleDrosophila melanogaster.Behav. Genet. 15:561–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zawistowski, S., and Richmond, R. C. (1987). Experience mediated courtship reduction ofDrosophila melanogaster in large and small chambers.J. Comp. Psychol. 101:90–93.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was partially supported by research awards from the Whitehall Foundation (to L. Ehrman), PSC-CUNY (662176 to H. R. Koepfer), and The Conservation Agency through a grant from the Falconwood Corporation (to H. R. Koepfer).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, YK., Ehrman, L. & Koepfer, H.R. Developmental isolation and subsequent adult behavior ofDrosophila paulistorum. I. Survey of the six semispecies. Behav Genet 22, 545–556 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01074307

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01074307

Key Words

Navigation