Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Psycholinguistic analyses of coercive communications

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Analyses of certain communications reveal a content structure for the interpretation of destructive acts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allport, G. (1942).The Use of Personal Documents in Psychological Science, Social Science Research Council, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, T., and Muhlhan, G. (1943).Character Personality 12:101–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auld, P., and Murray, E. (1955).Psychol. Bull. 52:377–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, A. (1942).J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 37:163–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haigh, G. (1949).J. Consult. Psychol. 13:181–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffal, J. (1960).J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 61(3):474–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffal, J. (1964).Am. Psychol. 19:813–815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, G. (1965).Psychol. Bull. 63:298–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R. (1969).Love and Will, Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R. (1972).Power and Innocence: A Search for the Sources of Violence, Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCurdy, H. (1947).J. Personality 16:109–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. (1969).Inquirer II Programmer's Guide, Washington University Press, St. Louis, Missouri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miron, M., and Pratt, C. (1973).Manual for the Development of Language Frequency Counts, Syracuse University Research Corporation, Syracuse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, R. (1974).Personality Disorders: Diagnosis and Management, J. Lion, Ed., Williams and Wilkens, Baltimore, p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C. (1959).Trends in Content Analysis, I. Pood, Ed., University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois, pp. 33–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paige, J. (1966).The General Inquirer: A Computer Approach to Content Analysis, P. Stone, D. Dunphy, M. Smith, and D. Ogilvie, Eds., M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 431–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shneidman, E. (1961).A Psychological Analysis of Political Thinking, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, P., Dunphy, D., Smith, M., and Ogilvie, D. (1969).The General Inquirer: A Computer Approach to Content Analysis, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedeschi, J., Smith, R., and Brown, R. (1974a).Psychol. Bull. 81(9):540–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedeschi, J., Smith, R., and Brown, R. (1974b).Psychol. Bull. 81(9):557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedeschi, J., Smith, R., and Brown, R. (1974c).Psychol. Bull. 81(9):559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velde, R. (1974).Terrorism (Part IV). Hearings before the Committee on Internal Security, House of Representatives. Ninety-third Congress, Second Session, Government Printing Office, Washington, pp. 4140, 4143.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York

    Murray S. Miron & Thomas A. Pasquale

Authors
  1. Murray S. Miron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas A. Pasquale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miron, M.S., Pasquale, T.A. Psycholinguistic analyses of coercive communications. J Psycholinguist Res 7, 95–120 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01074287

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01074287

Keywords

Search

Navigation