Abstract
The paper attempts to formulate concrete proposals for a change in laws of intellectual property, based on a communication-oriented theoretical analysis of the issue. The particular role of collection societies is investigated. The proposals arrived at suggest a strengthening of non-negotiable, non-hereditary authors' rights, and a “refinancing fee” collected for copies of works of art with classical status and distributed to members of currently active art circles.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Besen, S. and Raskind, L. (1991) “An Introduction to the Law and Economics of Intellectual Property”.Journal of Economic Perspectives 5: 3–28.
Bourdieu, P. (1979)La distinction: critique sociale du jugement. Editions de Minuit, Paris
Dietz, A. (1990) “A modern concept for the right of the community of authors (domaine public payant)”.Copyright Bulletin 24 (4): 13–24.
Hutter, M. (1989)Die Produktion von Recht. Eine selbstreferentielle Theorie der Wirtschaft, angewandt auf den Fall des Arzneimittelpatentrechts. Mohr (Siebeck), Tubingen.
Hutter, M. (1992) “Art as an Exhaustible Social Resource”.Ricerche Economiche 46: 29–40.
Kitch, E. (1977) “The Nature and Function of the Patent System”.Journal of Law and Economics 20: 265ff.
Kubler, G. (1962)The Shape of Time. Remarks on the History of Things. Yale University Press, New Haven.
Luhmann, N. (1984)Soziale Systeme. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt
Santagata, W. (1994) “Rights Allocation in the Contemporary Art Market: Copyright, ‘Droit de Suite’, ‘Right to Exhibit’”, in: A. Peacock and I. Rizzo, eds.,Cultural Economics and Cultural Policies, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 111–124.
Scherer, F.M.et al. (1958)Patents and the Corporation. Bedford
Towse, R. (1994) “Protection of Artists' Property Rights: Cause or Effect of Market Distortion?”. Paper presented at 8th International Congress on Cultural Economics, Witten.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hutter, M. On the construction of property rights in aesthetic ideas. J Cult Econ 19, 177–185 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01074204
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01074204