Skip to main content
Log in

Intellectual property and optimal copyright protection

  • Published:
Journal of Cultural Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Indeed, one has ample reason to despair of finding a legal tenet that governs the rights of authors and artists. There exists no legal principle by which the state is forced to grant to authors a right in their creation. They cannot claim any right thereupon. This is not to say that the state shall not award such a right. On the contrary, there is every reason to treat them like the most favoured workers, as they deliver a work that is more robust than ashlar, and bring food that does not decay...

Abstract

Copyright protection, or more generally, intellectual property rights, can be regarded as a means for the stimulation of production of information goods. This paper analyses the basic problem of production and dissemination of information and the role of copyright protection as an incentive for the producers of creative works. Using a simple model, it is shown that not only a cause for limiting the extent of copyright protection does exist, but that also an argument for a minimum level of protection can be found. Even optimal copyright protection, given the restriction that production and dissemination of information goods has to be co-ordinated by a market mechanism, however, does not lead to a first-best (allocatively efficient) solution. Hence, the judgment that copyright protection is the best solution to the basic problem can be grounded only on a comparative institutional approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Besen, S. and Kirby, S.N. (1989): Private Copying, Appropriability and Optimal Copying Royalties, 32 Journal of Law and Economics, 255 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besen, S. and Raskind, L.J. (1991): An Introduction to the Law and Economics of Intellectual Property, 5 Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breyer, S. (1970): The Uneasy Case for Copyright: A Study of Copyright in Books, Photocopies, and Computer Programs, 84 Harvard Law Review, 281 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, S.N.S. (1986): Property Rights and Invention, 8 Research in Law and Economics, 5 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooter, R. and Ulen, T. (1988): Law and Economics, Glenview and London.

  • Dixit, A.K and Stiglitz, J.E. (1977): Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity, 67 American Economic Review, 297 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurt, R.R. and Schuchmann, R.M. (1966): The Economic Rationale of Copyright, 56 American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings, 421 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jehoram, H.C. (1993): Urheberrecht: Eine Sache des Rechts oder der Opportunität?, in: E. Wadle (ed.): Historische Studien zum Urheberrecht in Europa, Berlin, Duncker und Humblot, 15 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindermann, M. (1987): Technik und Urheberrecht — Wechselwirkungen und gegenseitige Abhängigkeiten, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht/Film und Recht 4/1987, 219ff.

  • Klippel, D. (1993): Die Idee des geistigen Eigentums in Naturrecht und Rechtsphilosophie des 19. Jahrhunderts, in: E. Wadle (ed.): Historische Studien zum Urheberrecht in Europa, Berlin, Duncker und Humblot, 121 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koboldt, C., Leder, M. and Schmidtchen, D. (1992): Ökonomische Analyse des Rechts, WiSt 7/1992, 334 ff.

  • Koboldt, C. and Schmidtchen, D. (1991): Copyrights — A und O in Literatur und Musik?, ORDO Bd. 42, 295 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landes, W. and Posner, R. (1989): An Economic Analysis of Copyright Law, 18 Journal of Legal Studies, 325 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebowitz, S. (1986): Copyright Law, Photocopying and Price Discrimination, 8 Research in Law and Economics, 181 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menell, P.S. (1989): An Analysis of Copyright Protection for Application Programs, 41 Stanford Law Review, 1044 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novos, I.E. and Waldmann, M. (1984): The Effects of Increased Copyright Protection: An Analytic Approach, 92 Journal of Political Economy, 236 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novos, I.E. and Waldmann, M. (1987): The Emergence of Copying Technologies: What Have We Learned?, 5 Contemporary Policy Issues, 34 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Hare, M. (1980): A Malthusian Nightmare for the Composer and His Audience, in: Hendon, W.S., Shannahan, J.L. and MacDonald, A.J. (eds.): Economic Policy for the Arts, Cambridge, 114 ff.

  • O'Hare, M. (1982): Copyright and the Protection of Economic Rights 6 Journal of Cultural Economics, 33 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Hare, M. (1985): Why is Monopoly Efficient?, 4 Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 407 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, A. (1979): Public Policy and Copyright in Music: An Economic Analysis, in: A. Peacock, The Economic Analysis of Government, Oxford, 137 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pethig, R. (1988): Copyright and Copying Costs: A New Price-Theoretic Approach, 144 Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 462 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plant, A. (1934): The Economic Aspects of Copyright in Books, 1 Economica (new series), 167 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polinsky, A.M. (1983): An Introduction to Law and Economics, Boston and Toronto.

  • Priest, G. (1986): What Economists Can Tell Lawyers About Intellectual Property: Comment on Cheung, 8 Research in Law and Economics, 19 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosi, G. (1971): Ökonomische Theorie des Buches, Düsseldorf.

  • Quaedvlieg, A. A. (1992). The Economic Analysis of Intellectual Property Law, in: W.F. Korthals Altes, E.J. Dommering, P.B. Hugenholtz, and J.J.C. Kabel (eds.): Information Law Towards the 21st Century, 379 ff.

  • Russell, R.R. and Wilkinson, M. (1979): Microeconomics — A Synthesis of Modern and Neoclassical Theory, New York, John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidtchen, D. and Koboldt, C. (1993): A Pacemaker that Stops Halfway: The Decompilation Rule in the EEC Directive on the Legal Protection of Computer Programs, 13 International Review of Law and Economics, 413 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenschert, H.J. (1987): Ist der Sound urheberrechtlich schützbar?, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht/Film und Recht 12/1987, 612 ff.

  • Thurow, N. (1987): Rechtsschutz für den Urheber und Urheberrechtsnutzer, Zeitschrift für Urheberund Medienrecht/Film und Recht 6/1987, 320 ff.

  • Tirole, J. (1988): The Theory of Industrial Organization, Cambridge and London.

  • Tyerman, B.W. (1971): The Economic Rationale for Copyright for Published Books: A Reply to Professor Breyer, 18 UCLA Law Review, 1100 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadle, E. (1993): Privilegienschutz gegen den Nachdruck um 1800: Der Fall Artaria contra Götz, in: E. Wadle (ed.): Historische Studien zum Urheberrecht in Europa, Berlin, Duncker und Humblot, 33 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Weizsäcker, C.C. (1981): Rechte und Verhältnisse in der modernen Wirtschaftslehre, 34 Kyklos, 345 ff.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koboldt, C. Intellectual property and optimal copyright protection. J Cult Econ 19, 131–155 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01074202

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01074202

Key words

Navigation