Skip to main content
Log in

A critical review of questionnaires for assessing pain-related disability

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Standardized questionnaires offer a practical and cost-effective means for measuring moderate disability. Fourteen questionnaires that can be used for assessing pain-related disability are reviewed in this article. Their comparative attributes are summarized. Most of the questionnaires obtain information about specific activities of daily living. They vary in terms of structure, content, and intended applications. Psychometric theory provides the optimal method for evaluating these questionnaires, highlighting the importance of reliability and validity. Being mindful of psychometric qualities will help the evaluator to select an appropriate questionnaire. The present array of existing instruments points toward a need for comparison studies that may eventually result in more uniform methods for evaluating pain-related disability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Osterweis M, Kleinman A, Mechanic D.Pain and disability: Clinical, behavioral, and public policy perspectives. Washington: National Academy Press, 1987, p. 268.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mayer TG, Tencer AF, Kristoferson MS, Mooney V. Use of noninvasive techniques for quantification of spinal range-of-motion in normal subjects and chronic low-back dysfunction subjects.Spine 1984; 5: 88–95.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Keefe FJ, Wilkins RH, Cook WA. Direct observation of pain behavior in low back pain patients during physical examination.Pain 1984; 20: 59–68.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Follick, MJ, Ahern DK, Aberger EW. Development of an audiovisual taxonomy of pain behavior: Reliability and discriminant validity.Health Psychol 1985; 4: 555–568.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Deyo RA. Measuring the functional status of patients with low back pain.Arch Phys Med Rehab 1988; 69: 1044–1053.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Anastasi, A.Psychological testing (3rd Ed.). New York: Macmillan, 1968, p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Waddell G, Main CJ. Assessment of severity in low-back disorders. Spine 1984; 9: 204–208.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bergner, M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, Gilson, BS. The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and final revision of a health status measure.Med Care 1981; 19: 787–805.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain.Spine 1983; 8: 141–144.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Deyo RA. Comparative validity of Sickness Impact Profile and shorter scales for functional assessment in low-back pain.Spine 1986; 11: 951–954.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Millard RW, Jones RE. Construct validity of practical questionnaires for assessing disability of low-back pain.Spine 1991; 16: 835–838.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lehmann TR, Brand RA, Gorman TW. A low-back rating scale.Spine 1983; 8: 308–315.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Million R, Hall W, Nilsen KH, Baker RD, Jayson MI. Assessment of the progress of the back pain patient.Spine 1982; 7: 204–212.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O'Brien JP. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire.Physiotherapy 1980; 66: 271–273.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Triano JJ, Schultz AB. Correlation of objective measure trunk motion and muscle function with low-back disability ratings.Spine 1987; 12: 561–565.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hazzard RG, Fenwick JW, Kalisch SM, Redmond J, Reeves V, Reid S, Frymoyer JW. Functional restoration with behavioral support. A one-year prospective study of patients with chronic low-back pain.Spine 1989; 14: 157–161.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kames LD, Naliboff BD, Heinrich RL, Schag CC. The Chronic Illness Problem Inventory: Problem-oriented psychosocial assessment of patients with chronic illness.Int J Psychiat Med 1984; 14: 65–75.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Evans JH, Kagan A. Development of a functional rating scale to measure treatment outcome of chronic spinal patients.Spine 1986; 11: 277–281.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kerns RD, Turk DC, Rudy TE. The West Haven-Yale multidimensional pain inventory.Pain 1985; 23: 345–356.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Turk DC, Rudy TE, Stieg RL. The disability determination dilemma: Toward a multiaxial solution.Pain 1988; 34: 217–230.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tait RC, Chibnall JT, Krause S. The Pain Disability Index: Psychometric properties.Pain 1990; 40: 171–182.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rock DL, Fordyce WE, Brockway JA, Bergman JJ, Spengler DM. Measuring functional impairment associated with pain: Psychometric analysis of an exploratory scoring protocol for activity pattern indicators.Arch Phys Med Rehab 1984; 65: 295–300.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Millard RW. The Functional Assessment Screening Questionnaire: Application for evaluating pain-related disability.Arch Phys Med Rehab 1989; 70: 303–307.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fries JF, Spitz PW, Young DY. The dimensions of health outcomes: The Health Assessment Questionnaire, Disability, and Pain Scales.J Rheumatol 1982; 9: 789–793.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hawley DJ, Wolfe F, Cathey MA. Pain, functional disability, and psychological status: A 12-Month study of severity in fibromyalgia.J Rheumatol 1988; 15: 1551–1556.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Barnes, D., Benjamin S. The Self-Care Assessment Schedule (SCAS)-I. The purpose and construction of a new assessment of self care behaviours.J Psychosomat Res 1987; 31: 191–202.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Benjamin S, Barnes D. The Self-Care Assessment Schedule (SCAS)-II. Reliability and validity.J Psychosomat Res 1987; 31: 203–214.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Follick MJ, Smith TW, Ahern DK. The Sickness Impact Profile: A global measure of disability in chronic low back pain.Pain 1985; 21: 67–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Watt-Watson JH, Graydon JE. Sickness Impact Profile: A measure of dysfunction with chronic pain patients.J Pain Sympt Mnmt 1989: 4: 152–156.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Turner JA, Clancy S, McQuade KL, Cardenas DD. Effectiveness of behavioral therapy for chronic low back pain: A component analysis.J. Consult Clin Psychol 1990; 58: 573–579.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Millard, R.W. A critical review of questionnaires for assessing pain-related disability. J Occup Rehab 1, 289–302 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01073694

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01073694

Key Words

Navigation