Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Isokinetic strength testing in monitoring progress in a multidisciplinary work reentry program: A case study

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to present a case study of a patient with a history of low back pain and the use of isokinetic testing in tracking that patient through a work-reentry program. A 44-year-old male with a diagnosis of low back pain underwent a functional capacity evaluation and began a work-reentry program. Initial isokinetic testing revealed low torque outputs in both the trunk and knee flexion and extension tests as well as limited active range of motion. Coefficient of variation appeared to be relatively high and the patient seemed guarded in his movements during the testing. Psychological testing revealed a high fear of reinjury which may have influenced the initial test. Subsequent isokinetic testing performed on the tenth and twenty-fourth days of program and at 1 month post-program exhibited greater than expected increases in torque output. This could be due in part to a reduction in the fear of reinjury, a learning effect with repeated exposure to testing, and the patient's increased confidence in the use of unguarded movements. His trunk range of motion remained essentially the same throughout the serial testing. Pain in the back and left leg was slightly diminished despite an increase in strength and function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Perrin DH, Reliability of isokinetic measures.Athletic Training 1986; 21: 319–321.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nachemson A, Lindh M. Measurement of abdominal and back strength with and without low back pain.Scand J Rehab Med 1969; 1: 60–65.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Deyo RA. Conservative therapy for low back pain: Distinguishing useful from useless therapy.JAMA 1983; 250: 1057–1062.

    Google Scholar 

  4. MacDougall JD, Wenger HA. The purpose of physiological testing. In MacDougall JD, Wenger HA, Green HJ, eds,Physiological testing of the elite athlete. Ithaca, NY: Movement Publications, 1983; 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Astrand PO, Rodahl K.Textbook of work physiology: Physiological bases of exercise. New York: McGraw Hill Book Co, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Department of Labor:Dictionary of occupational titles (4th Ed.), Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Labor, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Loredan Biomedical.Lido isokinetic rehabilitation system operators manual. Davis, CA: Loredan Biomedical, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ.Functional restoration for spinal disorders: The sports medicine approach. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Muller EA. Influence of training and of inactivity on muscle strength.Arch PMR 1970; 51: 449–462.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Smith LE. Strength increments following massed and distributed practice relative to motor learning.Med Sci Sports Exercise 1974; 6: 154–157.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hickey, P.F. Isokinetic strength testing in monitoring progress in a multidisciplinary work reentry program: A case study. J Occup Rehab 1, 83–90 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01073282

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01073282

Key Words

Navigation