Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Physical therapy and occupational rehabilitation

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Occupational rehabilitation, while acknowledged as a multidisciplinary field, is only as effective as contributions of its individual disciplines. Physical therapy has been and is continuing to be an integral part of both the clinical and scientific portions of the team. Inherent in the physical therapy profession are three educational components which makes it a particularly suitable addition: movement science, pathology, and functional analysis. Physical therapists are active in each of the primary areas of occupational rehabilitation: musculoskeletal treatment, injury prevention education, functional capacity evaluation, restorative exercise, work hardening, ergonomics, and pre-work screening. Future challenges encompass increased skill in ergonomics, effectiveness in the return-to-work process, and in the scientific study of physical therapy techniques and their effectiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scully R, Barnes M.Physical therapy. Cambridge, MA: Lippincott, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Canfield J. Causes of movement dysfunction and physical disability. In Scully R, Barnes M, eds.Physical therapy. Cambridge, MA: Lippincott, 1988, pp. 130–319.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Isernhagen S. Role of the physical therapist in early intervention. In Isernhagen S, ed,Work injury: Management and prevention. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen, 1988, pp. 127–133.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Isernhagen, S. Three approaches to specific ergonomic problems. In Isernhagen S, ed,Work injury: Management and prevention. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen, 1988, pp. 80–90.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Morris A, Anderson C. Pre-employment screening. In Isernhagen S, ed,Work injury: Management and prevention. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen, 1988, pp. 92–104.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Isernhagen, S. Functional capacity evaluation. In Isernhagen S, ed,Work injury: Management and prevention. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen, 1988, pp. 137–192.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lett, C, McCabe E, Tramposh A, Tate Henderson S. Work hardening. In Isernhagen S, ed,Work injury: Management and prevention. Gaithersburg MD: Aspen, 1988, pp. 195–230.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ogden-Niemeyer L, Jacobs K.Work hardening. Thorofare, NJ: Slack, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Isernhagen S. Functional capacity assessment and work hardening perspectives. In Mayer T, Mooney V, Gatchel R, eds.Contemporary care for painful spinal disorders. Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febiger (in press).

  10. Key G. Work capacity analysis. In Scully R, Barnes M, eds.Physical therapy, Cambridge, MA Lippincott, 1988, pp. 652–669.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Isernhagen S. Chronic low back pain. In Scully R, Barnes M. eds.Physical therapy. Cambridge, MA: Lippincott, 1988, pp. 1136–1151.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wickstrom R. Vocational capacity with low back pain impairment. In Scheer S, ed,Medical perspectives in vocational assessment of impaired workers. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen, 1990, pp. 19–58.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Saunders, D.Evaluation, treatment and prevention of musculoskeletal disorders. Minneapolis, MN: Educational Opportunities, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bullock M.Ergonomics. Lodon, England: Churchill-Livingstone, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Isernhagen S. The therapist role. In Isernhagen S, ed,Work injury: Management and prevention. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen, 1988, pp. 331–337.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bullock M. Health education in the workplace. In Isernhagen S, ed,Work injury: Management and prevention. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen, 1988, pp. 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Isernhagen S. Back schools. In Isernhagen S, ed,Work injury: Management and prevention. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen, 1988, pp. 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  18. US Department of Health and Human Services.NIOSH work practices guide for manual lifting. Cincinnati, OH, 1981.

  19. US Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration.Ergonomics program management guidelines for meatpacking plants 1990.

  20. US Department of Labor.Dictionary of occupational titles. Indianapolis, IN, 1977.

  21. Keeley J. Do we need quantification for the subacute patient. In Mayer T, Mooney V, Gatchel R, eds.Contemporary care for painful spinal disorders. Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febiger (in press).

  22. West J. Chronic pain management. In Isernhagen S, ed,Work injury: Management and prevention. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen, 1988, pp. 283–294.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Isernhagen S. Ergonomics and cumulative trauma. In Isernhagen S, ed,Work injury: Management and prevention. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen, 1988, pp. 54–64.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pizatella T, Nelson R, Nestor D, Jensen R. The NIOSH strategy for reducing musculoskeletal injuries. In Isernhagen S, ed,Work injury: Management and prevention. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen, 1988, pp. 39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rhomberg S, Bernstein N. Employment screening: Legal and clinical considerations.WORK 1990; 1.

  26. Isernhagen S. Industrial health programs. In Isernhagen S, ed,Work injury: Management and prevention. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen, 1988, pp. 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Isernhagen S. Industrial rehabilitation — deja vu.WORK 1990; 1: 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Isernhagen, S.J. Physical therapy and occupational rehabilitation. J Occup Rehab 1, 71–82 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01073281

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01073281

Key Words

Navigation