Abstract
One concern of studies of emotions is that of the underlying denotative components of the meanings of emotional terms, whether people are actually cognizant of them or not. In this study, we evaluated the characteristics of 10 emotional denotative components and their hierarchical ordering in attribution to 22 emotion concepts across 23 different human societies. Empirically, a quantitative model, developed by Tzeng and Osgood (1976), was used to link the relationship between affect measures of the emotion concepts and their characteristics on denotative components. It was found that the 10 denotative components functioned extremely well in predicting the affect for individual cultures and also for the 23 cultures as a whole. Cross-cultural comparisons revealed some significant differences among the components in predicting indigenous affect attributions for different cultures. Finally, the nature and dynamics of such intercultural differences were discussed in reference to the issue of independence between affect and cognition.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Burling, R. (1964). Cognition and componential analyses: God's true or hocus pocus.American Anthropologist, 66, 20–28.
Davitz, J.R. (1969).The language of emotion. New York: Academic Press.
de Rivera, J. (1977). A structural theory of the emotions.Psychological Issues,10(4), monograph 40.
Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V., & Ellsworth, P. (1972).Emotion in the human face. New York: Pergamon Press.
Frijda, N.H. (1968a). Recognition of emotion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 4). New York: Academic Press.
Frijda, N.H. (1968b).Emotion and recognition of emotion. Paper presented at the Third Symposium on Feelings and Emotions, Loyola University, Chicago, October 10–12.
Frijda, N.H., & Philipszoon, E. (1963). Dimensions of recognition of emotion.Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 66, 45–51.
Goodenough, W. (1956). Componential analysis and the study of meaning.Language, 32, 155–216.
Hastorf, A.H., Osgood, C.E., & Ono, H. (1966). The semantics of facial expressions and the prediction of the meanings of stereoscopically fused facial expression.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 7, 179–188.
Izard, C.E., Kagan, J., & Zajonc, R.B. (Eds.). (1984).Emotions, cognition, and behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kagan, J. (1984). The idea of emotion in human development. In C.E. Izard, J. Kagan, & R.B. Zajonc (Eds.),Emotions, cognition, and behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lazarus, R.S. (1982). Thoughts on the relations between emotion and cognition.American Psychologist, 37, 1019–1024.
Lounbury, F.G. (1956). A semantic analysis of the Pawnee kinship usage.Language, 32, 158–194.
Osgood, C.E. (1967). Dimensionality of the semantic space for communication via facial expressions.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 7, 1–30.
Osgood, C.E. (1967). Exploration in semantic space: A personal diary.Journal of Social Issues, 27, 5–64.
Osgood, C.E., May, W.H., & Miron, M.S. (1975).Cross-cultural universality of affective meaning systems. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Romney, A.K., & D'Andrade, R.G. (1964). Cognitive aspects of English kin terms.American Anthropologist, 66(3), Part 2, 146–170.
Ruckmick, C.A. (1948).The psychology of feeling and emotion. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Schlosberg, H. (1954). Three dimensions of emotion.Psychological Review, 61, 81–88.
Tzeng, O.C.S., & Osgood, C.E. (1976). Validity tests for componential analyses of conceptual domains: A cross-cultural study in methodology.Behavioral Science, 21, 69–85.
Tzeng, O.C.S., Osgood, C.E., & May, W.H. (1976). Idealized cultural differences in kinship conceptions.International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 5, 51–71.
Wallace, A.F.C., & Atkins, J. (1960). The meaning of kinship terms.American Anthropologist, 62, 58–60.
Wolf, S. (1963). Discussion. In P.H. Knapp (Ed.),Expression of the emotions in man. New York: International Universities Press
Zajonc, R.B. (1984). On the primacy of affect.American Psychologist, 39, 117–123.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was planned and carried out as a part of a cross-cultural research project of out laboratory. It was completed during Dr. Rumjahn Hoosain's visiting professorship at Purdue University School of Science at Indianapolis for his sabbatical leave from the University of Hong Kong. The authors wish to express their gratitude to our foreign colleagues who participated in the data collection for this study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tzeng, O.C.S., Hoosain, R. & Osgood, C.E. Cross-cultural componential analysis on affect attribution of emotion terms. J Psycholinguist Res 16, 443–465 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01073272
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01073272