Skip to main content
Log in

Frequency-dependent sexual selection among wild-type strains ofDrosophila melanogaster

  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Frequency-dependent sexual selection was studied using three geographically isolated strains ofDrosophila melanogaster. The Oregon-R and Canton-Special wild-type strains were essentially homogeneous, having been maintained in laboratories since 1925; the wild Macomb strain was relatively genetically heterogeneous, having been collected in September 1972, immediately prior to this investigation. All possible double combinations of the three strains were placed in separate chambers of a modified Elens-Wattiaux observation apparatus at ratios of 5∶20, 12∶12, and 20∶5. Allowing 2 hr observation time for each chamber, data were collected to detect mating preference between these strains. There was no sexual isolation between the strains. However, frequency dependence, where rare males have a definite mating advantage in a population, was exhibited by the strains studied. Sexual vigor appeared to be a factor when the heterogeneous Macomb strain was mated to either of the two homogeneous strains in equal numbers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Averhoff, W. W., and Richardson, R. H. (1974). Pheromonal control of mating patterns inDrosophila melanogaster.Behav. Genet. 4:207–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bösiger, E. (1962). Sur le degré d'hétérozygotie des populations naturelles deDrosophila melanogaster et son maintien par la seléction sexuelle.Bull. Biol. 96:3–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L. (1966). Mating success and genotype frequency inDrosophila.Anim. Behav. 14:332–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L. (1967). Further studies on genotype frequency and mating success inDrosophila.Am. Naturalist 101:415–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L. (1969). The sensory basis of mate selection inDrosophila.Evolution 23:59–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L. (1970). The mating advantage of rare males inDrosophila.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 65:345–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L., and Petit, C. (1968). Genotype frequency and mating success inwillistoni species group ofDrosophila.Evolution 22:649–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elens, A. A., and Wattiaux, J. M. (1964). Direct observation of sexual isolation.Drosophila Inform. Serv. 39:118–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elens, A., Van Den Haute, J., and Delcour, J. (1973). Sexual vigor and sexual selection inDrosophila melanogaster.Evolution 27:549–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faugeres, A., Petit, C., and Thibout, E. (1971). Components of sexual selection.Evolution 25:265–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, J. E., Ehrman, L., and Schorsch, M. (1974). Bioassay of aDrosophila pheromone influencing sexual selection.Nature 250:261–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsley, D. L., and Grell, E. H. (1967).Genetic Variations in Drosophila melanogaster, Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication No. 627, p. 431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit, C. (1958). Le determinisme génétique et psycho-physiologique de la competition sexuelle chezDrosophila melanogaster.Bull. Biol. 92:248–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiess, E., and Langer, B. (1964). Mating speed control by gene arrangement inDrosophila persimilis.Evolution 21:672–678.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tardif, G.N., Murnik, M.R. Frequency-dependent sexual selection among wild-type strains ofDrosophila melanogaster . Behav Genet 5, 373–379 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01073206

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01073206

Key Words

Navigation