Skip to main content
Log in

Similarity and preferences in the space of simple lotteries

  • Published:
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A. Rubinstein's similarity-relation approach to decision making under uncertainty is extended by introducing a new concept of correlated similarity relations. It is shown that every expected utility preference is consistent with the ε-difference similarity relation on the prize space and some correlated similarity relations on the probability space, and that a similarity relation on the prize space and correlated similarity relations on the probability space overdetermine the preference (in A. Rubinstein's sense).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aizpurua, J. M., J. Nieto, and J.R. Uriarte. (1990). “Choice Procedure Consistent with Similarity Relations,”Theory and Decision 29: 235–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aizpurua, J. M., T. Ichiishi, J. Nieto and J. R. Uriarte. (1989). “Decision Making Under Risk: Non-Transitive Indifferences and Correlated Similarities,” Working Paper DT 9102LG, Departamento de Economá, Universidad Pública de Navarra-Nafarroako Unibertsitate Publikoa, 1991.

  • Armstrong, W. E. (1939). “The Determinateness of the Utility Function,”Economic Journal 49: 453–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, W. E. (1948). “Uncertainty and the Utility Function,”Economic Journal 58:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M., J.Y. Jaffray, and T. Said. (1985). “Individual Behavior under Risk and Under Uncertainty: An Experimental Study,”Theory and Decision 18: 203–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P. C. (1970). “Intransitive Indifference in Preference Theory: A Survey,”Operations Research 18: 207–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1936). “The Pure Theory of Consumer's Behavior,”Quarterly Journal of Economics 50:545–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1958). “Threshold in Choice and the Theory of Demand,”Econometrica 26:157–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D. (1956). “Semiorders and a Theory of Utility Discrimination,”Econometrica 24:178–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, A. (1988). “Similarity and Decision-Making Under Risk (Is There a Utility Theory Resolution to the Allais Paradox?),”Journal of Economic Theory 46: 145–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. (1969). “Intransitivity of Preferences,”Psychological Review 76 (1): 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. (1977). “Features of Similarity,”Psychological Review 84 (4): 327–352.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aizpurua, J.M., Ichiishi, T., Nieto, J. et al. Similarity and preferences in the space of simple lotteries. J Risk Uncertainty 6, 289–297 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01072616

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01072616

Key words

Navigation