Skip to main content
Log in

Estimating the demand for risky assets via the indirect expected utility function

  • Published:
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article obtains demand functions for risky assets without making a priori assumptions about the form of the utility function. In a simple portfolio model, the envelope theorem is applied to the indirect expected utility function to derive estimating equations. Tests for the existence of constant absolute or constant relative risk aversion are also developed. Empirical estimation of the demand for financial assets held by U.S. households for the period 1946–1985 indicates that aggregate household behavior is consistent with the existence of constant relative risk aversion, with the coefficient of risk aversion having a value of approximately 1.3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abel, Andrew B. (1991). “The Equity Premium Puzzle,”Business Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia September–October, 3–14.

  • Arrow, K. J. (1971).Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing. Chicago: Markham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby, C., D. Primont, and R. Russell. (1978).Duality, Separability, and Functional Structure: Theory and Economic Applications. New York: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, L., D. W. Jorgenson, and L. J. Lau. (1975). “Transcendental Logarithmic Utility Functions,”American Economic Review 65, 367–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalal, A. J. (1983). “Comparative Statics and Asset Substitutability/Complementarity in a Portfolio Model: A Dual Approach,”Review of Economic Studies 50, 355–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalal, A. J. (1988). “Asset Demands and Slutsky Equations When All Assets are Risky,”Metroeconomica 39, 205–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denny, M., and M. Fuss. (1977). “The Use of Approximation Analysis to Test for Separability and the Existence of Consistent Aggregates,”American Economic Review 67, 404–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibbotson, R. G., and R. A. Sinquefleld. (1986).Stocks, Bonds, Bills and Inflation: Historical Returns. Charlottesville, VA: Financial Research Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, L. T. (1962).The Savings and Loan Business. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehra, Rajnish, and Edward C. Prescott. (1985). “The Equity Premium: A Puzzle,”Journal of Monetary Economics 15, 145–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornstein, F. H. (1985).Savings Banks. Charlottesville, VA: Reston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, R. S. (1988). “Risk Aversion and Determinants of Stock Market Behavior,”Review of Economics and Statistics 70, 183–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito, M. (1977). “Household Flow-of-Funds Equations,”Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 19, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandmo, A. (1977). “Portfolio Theory, Asset Demand and Taxation: Comparative Statics with Many Assets,”Review of Economic Studies 44, 369–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberberg, E. (1978).The Structure of Economics: A Mathematical Analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors gratefully acknowledge helpful comments from the editor and an anonymous referee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dalal, A.J., Arshanapalli, B.G. Estimating the demand for risky assets via the indirect expected utility function. J Risk Uncertainty 6, 277–288 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01072615

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01072615

Key words

Navigation