Skip to main content
Log in

Reevaluating the relationship between transferable property rights and command-and-control regulation

  • Published:
Journal of Regulatory Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Economists generally assume that systems of transferable property rights are preferable to non-market systems. This paper suggests that the design of a market-based policy that dominates a command-andcontrol regime is more subtle than is commonly believed, even in theory. The subtlety arises because identical approaches to monitoring and enforcement will not generally yield the same results in different regulatory environments. The paper identifies conditions under which a kind of market dominance result obtains. The theory is then applied to the problem of trading rights to emit pollutants from motor vehicles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker, Gary, 1968. “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach.”Journal of Political Economy 77: 169–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dales, John H. 1968.Pollution, Property and Prices. Toronto, Canada: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Explanation of Why Fleet Averaging Would Allow More Auto Pollution.” 1989, undated, unpublished mimeo, circulated among the House of Representatives.

  • Hahn, Robert, 1984. “Market Power and Transferable Property Rights.”Quarterly Journal of Economics 99: 753–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, Robert, 1989.A Primer on Environmental Policy Design. London: Harwood Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, Robert. 1990. “The Politics and Religion of Clean Air.”Regulation (Winter): 21–30.

  • Harford, John. 1978. “Firm Behavior Under Imperfectly Enforceable Pollution Standards and Taxes.”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 5: 26–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Carol. 1990. “Standard Setting with Incomplete Enforcement Revisited.”Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 8: 72–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Carol and Suzanne Scotchmer. 1990. “The Social Cost of Uniform Regulatory Standards in a Hierarchical Government.”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 19: 61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malueg, David, 1990. “Welfare Consequences of Emission Credit Trading Programs.”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 18: 66–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik, Arun, 1990. “Markets for Pollution Control When Firms are Noncompliant.”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 18: 97–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misiolek, Walter and Harold Elder. 1989. “Exclusionary Manipulation of Markets for Pollution Rights.”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 16: 156–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, W. David. 1972. “Markets in Licenses and Efficient Pollution Control Programs.”Journal of Economic Theory 5: 395–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noll, Roger 1982. “Implementing Marketable Emission Permits.”American Economic Review 72 (May): 120–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, Wallace and Albert McGartland. 1985. “Marketable Pollution Permits and Acid Rain Externalities: A Comment and Some Further Evidence.”Canadian Journal of Economics XVIII: 668–675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, Wallace, Paul Portney, and Albert McGartland. 1985. “The Net Benefits of IncentiveBased Regulation: A Case Study of Environmental Standard Setting.”American Economic Review 79: 1233–1242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, Jonathan and Cathy Kling, 1993. “An Emission Saved Is an Emission Earned: An Empirical Study of Emission Banking for Light Duty Vehicle Manufacturers.”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 25: 257–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavins, Robert, ed. 1988.Project 88: Harnessing Market Forces to Protect Our Environment-Initiatives for the New President, a public policy study sponsored by Senator Timothy E. Wirth and Senator John Heinz, Washington, D.C.

  • Stavins, Robert, ed. 1991.Project 88-Round II, Incentives for Action: Implementing Market-Based Environmental Strategies, a public policy study sponsored by Senator Timothy E. Wirth and Senator John Heinz, Washington, D.C.

  • U.S. House of Representatives, Subcommittee on Health and the Environment. 1989. Hearing on Administration Proposal to Amend Clean Air Act, July 24, unpublished mimeo.

  • U.S. House of Representatives. 1990. “Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990.” Conference Report to accompany S. 1630,Report 101-952,101st Congress, second session, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

  • Viscusi, W. Kip, and Richard Zeckhauser, 1979. “Optimal Standards with Incomplete Enforcement.”Public Policy 27: 437–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Lawrence J. 1982.The Regulation of Air Pollutant Emissions from Motor Vehicles. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Mr. Hahn is a Resident Scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and an Adjunct Professor of Economics at Carnegie University. Mr. Axtell is a Research Associate at the Brookings Institution. We would like to thank Linda Cohen, Glenn Loury, Eric Stork, and participants in the Harvard environmental economics workshop and the Stanford environmental economics conference for constructive comments. Jeff Alson, Richard Wilcox, and Don Zinger helped identify useful data sources. This research was supported in part by a grant from the National Science Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hahn, R.W., Axtell, R.L. Reevaluating the relationship between transferable property rights and command-and-control regulation. J Regul Econ 8, 125–148 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01072586

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01072586

Keywords

Navigation