Abstract
This paper presents the results of a public survey on the perceived severity of different kinds and levels of penalties gathered using magnitude estimation techniques. Three topics are dealt with. Individual scales of sentence severity are shown to be internally consistent. Then the structural properties of the severity scales of fine, imprisonment, community work, and probation are analyzed. Finally, what a given penalty is worth in relation to other types of punishment from the public's point of view is established and compared to existing exchange rates prescribed in legal statutues or practiced by criminal courts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, R. B., and Anson, R. H. (1985). Development of a punishment scale: The item displacement phenomenon.Crim. Just. Rev. 10: 39–44.
Austin, J., and Krisberg, B. (1982). The unmet promise of alternatives to incarceration.Crime Deling. July: 374–409.
Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Martin, S., and Tonry, M. (1983).Research on Sentencing: The Search for Reform, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., Vol. 1.
Buchner, D. (1979). Scale of sentence severity.J. Crim. Law Criminal. 70(2): 182–187.
Cousineau, M., Laberge D., and Theoret, B. (1986).Prisons et prisonniers: une analyse de la detention provinciale quebecoise durantla derniere decennie, Universite du Quebec a Montreal, Montreal.
Dohrenwend, B. S., Krasnoff, L., Askenasy, A. R., and Dohrenwend B. P. (1978). Exemplification of a method for scaling life events: The Peri Life Events Scale.J. Health Soc. Behav. 19: 205–229.
Erickson, M. L., and Gibbs, J. P. (1979). On the perceived severity of legal penalties.J. Crim. Law Criminal. 70: 102–116.
Forst, B., and Wellford, C. (1981). Punishment and sentencing: Developing sentencing guidelines from principles of punishment.Rutgers Law Rev. 33: 799–835.
Hamblin, R. L. (1974). Social attitudes: Magnitude measurement and theory. In Blalock, H. M. (ed.),Measurement in the Social Sciences, Aldine, Chicago.
Hamilton, V. L., and Rotkin, L. (1976). Interpreting the Eighth Amendment: Perceived seriousness of crime and severity of punishment. In Bedau, H. and Pierce, C. (eds.),Capital Punishment in the United States, AMS Press, New York.
Hindelang, M., Dunn, C., Sutton, P., and Aumick, A. L. (1975).Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics—1974, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.
Holmes, T. H., and Rahe, R. H. (1974). Life change and illness susceptibility. In Dohrenwend, B. S., and Dohrenwend, B. P. (eds.),Stressful Life Events: Their Nature and Effects, Wiley, New York.
Kleinig, J. (1973).Punishment and Desert, Martimus Nijhoff, The Hague.
Lodge, M. (1981).Magnitude Scaling: Quantitative Measurement of Opinions, Sage, Beverly Hills.
McClelland, K. A., and Alpert, G. P. (1985). Factor analysis applied to magnitude estimates of punishment seriousness: Patterns of individual differences.J. Quant. Criminol. 1: 307–318.
Newman, G. (1983).Just and Painful: A Case for the Corporal Punishment of Criminals, Macmillan, New York.
Sebba, L. (1978). Some explorations in the scaling of penalties.J. Res. Crime Delinq. 15: 247–265.
Sebba, L., and Nathan, G. (1984). Further explorations in the scaling of penalties.Br. J. Criminol. 23(2): 221–249.
Sellin, T., and Wolfgang, M. E. (1964).Measuring Delinquency, Wiley, New York.
Shinn, A. (1974). Relations between scales. In Blalock, H. M. (ed.),Measurement in the Social Sciences, Aldine, Chicago.
Sorokin, P. A. (1962).Social and Cultural Dynamics: Fluctuations of Systems of Truth, Ethics and Law, Bedminster Press, New York, Vol. 2.
Stevens, S. S. (1975).Psychophysics: Introduction to its Perceptual, Neural and Social Prospects, Wiley, New York.
Wilkins, L. (1984).Consumerist Criminology, Heinemann, London.
Williams, K. R., and Hawkins, R. (1986). Perceptual research on general deterrence: A critical review.Law and Soc. Rev. 20: 545–572.
Wolfgang, M. E., Figlio, R. M., Tracy, P. E., and Singer, S. I. (1985).The National Survey of Crime Severity, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tremblay, P. On penal metrics. J Quant Criminol 4, 225–245 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01072451
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01072451