Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analytic estimates of computer design at the structural stage

  • Published:
Cybernetics Aims and scope

Conclusions

The analytic relationships derived in this paper could be used in practice to set forth the estimated requirements to the characteristics and the choice of the components of elementary (consecutive) computational systems of different complexity level and different purposes (computers, computer units, and programs). Proceeding from overall system requirements, these relationships can be used after the set of system components has been determined. This principle should also be applied to a different organization of the computational process according to classification of [1]. Other methods of structural optimization could also be used to arrive at more accurate estimates of the realization complexity. For instance, when building an arithmetic logic device (ALD), one could proceed, after solving one of the problems discussed here (for instance, the first problem), to use the results of [10] to optimize the bus-register structure of ALD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. M. T. Flynn, “Some computer organizations and their effectiveness,” IEEE Trans. Comput.,21, 948–960.

  2. B. S. Sotskov, Principles of the Theory and Calculation of Reliability of Automation and Computer Components and Devices [in Russian], Vysshaya Shkola, Moscow (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yu. S. Golubev-Novozhilov, Multicomputer Complexes [in Russian], Sov. Radio, Moscow (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yu. P. Zhuravlev, System Design of Control Computers [in Russian], Sov. Radio, Moscow (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  5. V. L. Volkovich and L. F. Dargeiko, “An algorithm for selection of a compromise solution for linear criteria,” Kibernetika, No. 5, 62–69 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Korn and T. Korn, Mathematical Handbook for Scientists and Engineers, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  7. H. R. Grosch, “High-speed arithmetic: the digital computer as a research tool,” J. Opt. Soc. Amer.,43, No. 4, 306–310 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Knight, “Evaluation of the development of computer features,” Zarub. Radioelektronika, No. 11, 63–83 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Ferrari, Evaluating the Performance of Computers [Russian translation], Mir, Moscow (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. P. Bashlakov, A. F. Kurgaev, and A. V. Palgin, “Synthesis of the structure of the operational automaton of a microprocessor,” Kibernetika, No. 3, 138–142 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. A. F. Kurgaev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Translated from Kibernetika, No. 6, pp. 49–56, November–December, 1984.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kurgaev, A.F. Analytic estimates of computer design at the structural stage. Cybern Syst Anal 20, 829–840 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01072170

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01072170

Keywords

Search

Navigation