Abstract
Carol Chomsky found evidence to support the notion that children have not mastered the syntactic form of the sentence “John is easy to see” until after the age of 8 years. However, she failed to control for the effects the visual stimulus might have had on the child's understanding of the stimulus question. This study reexamined Chomsky's conclusions by using two experimental conditions. The first condition was an exact replication of Chomsky's method, while the second included a control for the biasing effects produced by the visual stimulus. The results confirmed the authors' suspicions that the visual stimulus was indeed distorting Chomsky's findings and that, on the average, children were able to decode this particular syntactic form by the age of 67 months. These findings are discussed from the perspective of Bruner's theory, which states that cognitive processes of children under 8 years of age are dominated by the iconic mode of representation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bruner, J. S. (1966). On cognitive growth, I and II. In Bruner, J. S., Olver, R. R., and Greenfield, P. M. (eds.),Studies in Cognitive Growth, Wiley, New York.
Cambon, J., and Sinclair, H. (1974). Relations between syntax and semantics: Are they “easy to see”?Br. J. Psychol. 65:133–140.
Chomsky, C. (1969).The Acquisition of Syntax in Children from 5 to 10, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Cromer, R. F. (1970). “Children are nice to understand”: Surface structure clues for the recovery of a deep structure.Br. J. Psychol. 61:395–408.
Kessel, F. S. (1970). The role of syntax in children's comprehension from ages six to twelve.Monogr. Soc. Res. Child Dev. 35:138–141.
McNeill, D. (1970).The Acquisition of Language: The Study of Developmental Psycholinguistics, Harper and Row, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Perry, F.L., Shwedel, A. Interaction of visual information, verbal information, and linguistic competence in the preschool-aged child. J Psycholinguist Res 8, 559–566 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01071183
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01071183