Abstract
This article deals with relations between “mental motor” evoking capacity (“motority,” Putnoky, 1975a, b) and the sensory and affective connotations, as well as certain denotations, of words. Sensory connotation is indexed by degree of visual auditory, and tactual imagery, as assessed on a 7-point scale, while affective connotation is indexed by the usual three factors tapped by the semantic differential. The aspect of denotation used here is the abstractness value of words, also based on rating by scales. The general conclusions about motority are as follows: (1) the finding that its sensory connotations are mainly via theauditory modality of imagery, and especially in correlation with abstract words, suggests that it has a specific function that may have originated in the processing of heard language; (2) it correlates with thepotency andactivity factors of affective connotation, which suggests the existence of a nonspecific function or component in it; (3) correlations with abstractness reflect that motority must have a denotative function or component, especially in case of abstract verbal stimuli. On the basis of the results, motority is supposed to play a regulative role at higher levels of the organization of word meaning in particular.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baddeley, A. D. (1966a). Short-term memory for word sequences as a function of acoustic, semantic and formal similarity.Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 18:362–365.
Baddeley, A. D. (1966b). The influence of acoustic and semantic similarity of long-term memory for word sequences.Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 18:302–309.
Cornoldi, C. (1976).Memoria e Immaginziones, Patron, Bologna.
Craik, F. I. M. (1970). The fate of primary memory items in free recall.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 9:143–148.
Gorman, A. M. (1961). Recognition memory for nouns as a function of abstractness and frequency.J. Exp. Psychol. 61:23–29.
Gould, L. N. (1949). Auditory hallucinations and subvocal speech.J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 109:418–427.
Gould, L. N. (1950). Verbal hallucination as automatic speech.Am. J. Psychiat. 107:110–119.
Hebb, D. O. (1968). Concerning imagery.Psychol. Rev. 75:466–477.
Janssen, W. H., and Nodine, C. F. (1974). Eye movements and visual imagery in free recall.Acta Psychol. 38:267–276.
Levin, J. (1963).Three-Mode Factor Analysis. (See Osgoodet al., 1975).
McGuigan, F. J., (ed.) (1966).Thinking: Studies of Covert Language Processes, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.
McGuigan, F. J., and Schoonover, R. A. (eds.) (1973).The Psychophysiology of Thinking: Studies of Covert Processes, Academic Press, New York.
McGuigan, F. J., and Tanner, R. G. (1971). Covert oral behavior during conversational and visual dreams.Psychon. Sci. 23:263–264.
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., and Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957).The Measurement of Meaning, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Ill.
Osgood, C. E., May, W. H., and Miron, M. S. (1975).Cross-Cultural Universals of Affective Meaning, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Ill.
Paivio, A. (1965). Abstractness, imagery, and meaningfulness in paired-associate learning.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 4:32–38.
Paivio, A. (1968). A factor-analytic study of word attributes and verbal learning.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 7:41–49.
Paivo, A. (1971).Imagery and Verbal Processes, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., and Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.J. Exp. Psychol. Monogr. Suppl. 76 (1,2):1–25
Putnoky, J. (1975a). Measuring the motor evoking capacity, of words by a rating procedure.Magyar Pszichol. Szem. 32:383–395. (In Hungarian.)
Putnoky, J. (1975b). Visual, auditory and tactual modalities of imagery, and their relations to word abstractness and motority.Ann. Univer. Sci. Budapest. Rolando Eotvos nom. Sec. Paedagog. Psychol. 4:57–65.
Putnoky, J. (1976a). “Motority” as a correlate of word abstractness: A rating procedure.Stud. Psychol. 18:51–64.
Putnoky, J. (1976b). On a cross-cultural investigation into the psychology of meaning.Ethnographia 87:438–441. (In Hungarian.)
Putnoky, J., and Ster, A. (1974). Imagery and motor arousal capacity of verbal mediators in paired-associate learning.Study. Psychol. 16:253–258.
Rey, A. (1958). les images mentales en psychophysiologie.Dialectica 12:130–145.
Small, E. R. (1958).Age and Sex Differences in the Semantic Structure of Children. (See Osgoodet al., 1975.)
Sokolov, A. N. (1969). Studies of the speech mechanisms of thinking. In Cole, M., and Maltzman, I. (eds.),A Handbook of Contemporary Soviet Psychology, Basic Books, New York.
Spreen, O., and Schultz, R. W. (1966). Parameters of abstraction, meaningfulness, and pronunciability for 329 nouns.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 5:459–468.
Triandis, H. C., and Osgood, C. E. (1958). A comparative factorial analysis of semantic structures in monolingual Greek and American college students.J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 57:187–196.
Tzeng, O. C. S., and May, W. H. (1975). More than E, P and A in semantic differential scales: An answer to questions raised by S. T. M. Lanes.Int. J. Psychol. 10:101–117.
Wickelgren, W. A. (1969). Auditory or articulatory coding in verbal short-term memory.Psychol. Rev. 76:232–235.
Yuille, J. C., and Barnsley, R. H. (1969). Visual, auditory and tactual imagery in pairedassociate learning. InProceedings of the 19th International Congress of Psychology, London, p. 215.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Computation of SD data was carried out under the direction and according to the programming of Professor William H. May in the Center for Comparative Psycholinguistics (Director: Charles E. Osgood), University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, with support provided by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH 07705) and National Science Foundation (NSF GS 360 and 2012-X).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Putnoky, J. “Motority” in three functional domains of word meaning. J Psycholinguist Res 8, 543–558 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01071182
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01071182