Abstract
Congress is considering telecommunications reform legislation that would allow the Regional Bell Operating Companies (RBOCs) to enter the interLATA long-distance market. A concern is that a vertically-integrated RBOC would be able to discriminate against its rivals. A proposed remedy would require the RBOCs to reduce their access market share as a precondition to interLATA entry. We show formally that such a precondition likely contributes to higher long-distance prices and enhances the risk of discrimination. Furthermore, the lower the share of access profits retained by an RBOC, the weaker are its incentives to lower long-distance prices.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baumol, William and J. Gregory Sidak. 1994.Toward Competition in Local Telephony. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Bernheim, B. Douglas, and Robert D. Willig.Appropriate Preconditions for Removal of the InterLATA Restrictions on the RBOCs, Affidavit filed with the United States Department of Justice in support of AT&T's Opposition to Ameritech's Motions for “Permanent” and “Temporary” Waivers from the Interexchange Restriction of the Decree (D.D.C.) Case No. 82-0192 (February 15, 1994).
Brock, Gerald W. 1994.Telecommunications Policy For The Information Age. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Crandall, Robert W. 1989. “The Role of the U.S. Local Operating Companies.” InChanging The Rules: Technological Change, International Competition, and Regulation in Communications, edited by Robert W. Crandall and Kenneth Flamm. Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
Economics and Technology, Inc./Hatfield Associates, Inc. 1994. “The Enduring Local Bottleneck: Monopoly Power and the Local Exchange Carriers.” February.
Fowler, Mark S., Albert Halprin, and James D. Schlichting. 1986. ‘’Back To the Future’: A Model For Telecommunications.”Federal Communications Law Journal 38 (no. 2, August): 145–200.
Hall, Robert E. 1993. “Long Distance: Public Benefits From Increased Competition.”Applied Economics Partners. Menlo Park, California. October.
Huber, Peter W., Michael Kellogg, and John Thorne. 1992.The Geodesic Network II: 1993 Report on Competition in the Telephone Industry. Washington D.C.: The Geodesic Company.
Keller, John J. and Mark Robichaux. 1994. “Sprint, 3 Cable Firms to Form Phone Venture.”The Wall Street Journal. October 25. p. A3.
Kellogg, Michael K., John Thorne, and Peter W. Huber. 1992.Telecommunications Law. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Kovacic, William E. 1992. “The Antitrust Law And Economics of Essential Facilities In Public Utility Regulation.” InEconomic Innovations In Public Utility Regulation, edited by Michael A. Crew. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
MacAvoy, Paul W. 1995. “Tacit Collusion by Regulation: Pricing of Interstate Long-Distance Telephone Services.”Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 4:147–185.
MCI Communications Corp. vs. AT&TCo.,708 F.2D 1081 (7th Cir.) cert, denied, 464 U.S. 891 (1983).
Perry, Martin. 1989. “Vertical Integration: Determinants and Effects.In Handbook of Industrial Organization, edited by R. Schmalensee and R. Willig. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Salop, S.C., and D.T. Scheffman. 1983. “Raising Rivals' Costs.”American Economic Review 73:267–271.
Sievers, Mark. 1994. “Should The InterLATA Restriction Be Lifted? Analysis Of The Significant Issues.” Paper Presented at Rutgers University Advanced Workshop in Regulation and Public Utility Economics. 7th Annual Western Conference, San Diego, California. (July 6–8).
S.652 (The Telecommunications Competition and Deregulation Act of 1995) 104th Congress, 1st Session, June 15, 1995.
Sappington, David E. M., and Dennis L. Weisman. 1995.Designing Incentive Regulation For The Telecommunications Industry. Washington D.C.: American Enterprise Institute and Cambridge: MIT Press.
Taylor, Lester D. 1994.Telecommunications Demand In Theory and Practice. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Taylor William E., and Lester. D. Taylor. 1993. “Post-Divestiture Long-Distance Competition in the United States.”American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 83(2): 85–190.
Temin, Peter. 1987.The Fall of the Bell System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
United States of America vs. AT&T Corp. and McCaw Cellular Communications, Inc.Final Judgement. July 15, 1994, p. 14–16.
Vickers, John. 1994. “Competition and Regulation in Vertically Related Markets.”The Review of Economic Studies 62:1–17.
WEFA Group. 1993. “Economic Impact of Eliminating the Line-of-Business Restrictions On The Bell Companies.”
Weisman, Dennis L. 1993 “Superior Regulatory Regimes in Theory and Practice.”Journal of Regulatory Economics 5 (no. 4, December): 355–366.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I thank Timothy Brennan, Barbara Cherry, Alfred Kahn, Alex Larson, David Sappington, David Sibley, Lester Taylor, and Steve Wildman for insightful comments on an earlier draft of this paper. I am also grateful to the editor, Michael Crew, and an anonymous referee for a particularly careful reading of this work and for many constructive suggestions for revision. The usual caveat applies.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weisman, D.L. Regulation and the vertically integrated firm: The case of RBOC entry into interlata long distance. J Regul Econ 8, 249–266 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01070808
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01070808