Skip to main content
Log in

Genetics of escape-avoidance conditioning in laboratory and wild populations of rats: A biometrical approach

  • Evolution of Behavior
  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The interest of biometrical geneticists in the genetic architecture of behavior is explained with reference to the additive, dominance, and epistatic components of variation and their relation to evolutionary pressures. For one phenotype, escape-avoidance conditioning inRattus norvegicus, a fairly complete description of its genetic architecture has been gradually built and the major conclusions from four studies of this phenotype are reported: a selection study initially demonstrated the presence of large amounts of additive genetic variation and produced phenotypically extreme lines needed for later work; a diallel cross provided the opportunity for detailed examination of the dominance effects; a triple test cross permitted a similar examination of epistatic effects; and finally, another triple test cross using wild rats provided a confirmatory first attempt to test the assumption that a wild population's genetic architecture did not differ markedly from that found in laboratory populations. In relating the genetic findings to the evolutionary significance of behaviors in the escape-avoidance paradigm, it is argued that interspecific comparisons might play a major role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angus, J. (1974). Changes in the behaviour of individual members of a Drosophila population maintained by random mating.Heredity 33:89–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bignami, G. (1965). Selection for high and low rates of conditioning in the rat.Anim. Behav. 13:221–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bignami, G., and Bovet, D. (1965). Expérience de sélection par rapport à une réaction conditionée d'évitement chez le rat.C. R. Acad. Sci. 260:1239–1244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breese, E. L., and Mather, K. (1960). The organisation of polygenic activity within a chromosome inDrosophila. II. Viability.Heredity 14:375–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadhurst, P. L. (1979). The experimental approach to behavioral evolution. In Royce, J. R., and Mos, L. P. (eds.),Theoretical advances in behavior genetics, Sijthoff and Noordhoff International, Alphen aan der Rhijn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadhurst, P. L., and Bignami, G. (1965). Correlative effects of psychogenetic selection: A study of the Roman high and low avoidance strains of rats.Behav. Res. Ther. 2:273–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadhurst, P. L., and Jinks, J. L. (1961). Biometrical genetics and behavior: Re-analysis of published data.Psychol. Bull. 58:337–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A. (1928). The possible modification of the response of the wild type to recurrent mutations.Am. Nat. 62:115–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A. (1958).The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, 2nd ed., Dover, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulker, D. W. (1966). Mating speed in maleDrosophila melanogaster: A psychogenetic analysis.Science 153:203–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulker, D. W., and Broadhurst, P. L. (1971). A diallel study of the effects of genotype-environment interaction on activity and learning in the rat.Heredity 27:480 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulker, D. W., Wilcock, J., and Broadhurst, P. L. (1972). Studies in genotype-environment interaction. I. Methodology and preliminary multivariate analysis of a diallel cross of eight strains of rat.Behav. Genet. 2:261–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, N. D. (1964). A species difference in conditioned emotional response.Psychol. Rep. 15:579–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, N. D. (1968). Genetic analysis of acquisition of a conditioned fear in mice.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 65:325–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, J. K. (1980). A note on the test of direction of dominance in the triple test cross in the presence of genotype × environment interaction.Heredity 45:293–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, J. K., and Fulker, D. W. (1981a). Using the triple test cross to investigate the genetics of behavior in wild populations. I. Methodological considerations.Behav. Genet. 11:23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, J. K., and Fulker, D. W. (1981b). Using the triple test cross to investigate the genetics of behavior in wild populations. II. Escape-avoidance conditioning in Norway rats (submitted for publication).

  • Jinks, J. L., Perkins, J. M., and Breese, E. L. (1969). A general method of detecting additive, dominance and epistatic variation for metrical traits. II. Application to inbred lines.Heredity 24:45–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearsey, M. J., and Barnes, B. W. (1970). Variation for metrical characters in Drosophila populations. II. Natural selection.Heredity 25:11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearsey, M. J., and Jinks, J. L. (1968). A general method of detecting additive, dominance and epistatic variation for metrical traits. I. Theory.Heredity 23:403–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J. A. (1977). Behavioral comparisons and evolution. In Oliverio, A. (ed.),Genetics, Environment and Intelligence, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linney, R. (1977). Polymorphism at two loci through selection for linear metrical deviation.Heredity 38:379–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K. (1941). Variation and selection of polygenic characters.J. Genet. 41:159–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K. (1960). Evolution in polygenic systems.Acad. Naz. Lincei 47:131–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K. (1973).Genetical Structure of Populations, Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K. (1974). Non-allelic interactions in continuous variation of randomly breeding populations.Heredity 32:414–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K. (1979). Historical overview: Quantitative variation and polygenic systems. In Thompson, J. N., and Thoday, J. M. (eds.),Quantitative Genetic Variation, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K., and Harrison, B. J. (1949). The manifold effect of selection.Heredity 3:1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K., and Jinks, J. L. (1971).Biometrical Genetics, 2nd ed., Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowrer, O. H. (1960).Learning Theory and Behavior, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, V. A. (1972). The inheritance of two-way avoidance behaviour in rats: An introduction to the triple-test cross, Unpublished master's dissertation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, V. A. (1979). The genetic control of shuttle avoidance behaviour in laboratory rats: A triple-test cross investigation, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, P. M. (1967).Natural Selection and Heredity, Hutchinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virk, D. S., and Jinks, J. L. (1977). The consequences of using inadequate testers in the simplified triple test cross.Heredity 38:237–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcock, J., and Fulker, D. W. (1973). Avoidance learning in rats: Genetic evidence for two distinct behavioral processes in the shuttle box.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 82:247–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcock, J., Fulker, D. W., and Broadhurst, P. L. (1981). Analysis of two-way escapeavoidance conditioning measures from a diallel cross of eight strains of rats.Behav. Genet. 11:339–358.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hewitt, J.K., Fulker, D.W. & Broadhurst, P.L. Genetics of escape-avoidance conditioning in laboratory and wild populations of rats: A biometrical approach. Behav Genet 11, 533–544 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01070008

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01070008

Key Words

Navigation