Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Retrieval models in on-line documentary information systems: An analytic review

  • Published:
Cybernetics Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literature Cited

  1. L. C. Smith, “Artificial intelligence in information retrieval systems,” Inform. Process. Management,12, No. 3, 189–222 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. D. Barraclough, “On-line searching in information retrieval,” J. Doc.,33, No. 3, 220–238 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  3. K. Sparck Jones and C. J. van Rijsbergen, “Information retrieval test collections,” J. Doc.,32, No. 1, 59–75 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. F. Dammers, “The economics of computer-based information systems: A Review,” J. Doc.,31, No. 1, 38–45 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Z. G. Martirosyan and G. V. Zvereva, “Structure of automated information retrieval systems operating in dialogue mode,” Nauchn.-Tekh. Inform., Ser. 2, No. 5, 35–37 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. R. Swanson, “Information retrieval as a trial-and-error process,” Lib. Q.,47, No. 2, 128–148 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. Vernimb, “Automation query adjustment in document retrieval,” Inform. Process. Management,13, 339–353 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. N. Chernenko, A Review of Certain US Government Automated IRS [in Russian], Kiev (1976) (Preprint No. 76-43, Institute of Cybernetics, Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR).

  9. G. N. Aptekman, K. I. Volodin, and M. V. Rabins, “Comparison of software packages for automated IRS,” Nauchn.-Tekh. Inform., Ser. 2, No. 10, 23–25 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  10. O. E. Yakovlev, “Description and analysis of automated data banks,” Nauchn.-Tekh. Inform., Ser. 2, No. 7, 29–38 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. N. Oddy, “Information retrieval through man-machine dialogue,” J. Doc.,33, No. 1, 1–14 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. E. Robertson, “Progress in documentation. Theories and models in information retrieval,” J. Doc.,33, No. 2, 126–148 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. I. Mal'tsev, Algebraic Systems [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. G. Kurosh, Readings in General Algebra [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. C. Lyndon, Notes on Logic, Van Nostrand Reinhold (1966).

  16. E. Raseva and R. Sikorskii, The Mathematics of Metamathematics [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. A. Skornyakov, Elements of the Theory of Structure [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nicolas Bourbaki, General Topology, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  19. C. J. van Rijsbergen, “A theoretical basis for the use of co-occurrence data in information retrieval,” J. Doc.,33, No. 2, 106–119 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  20. D. J. Harper and C. J. van Rijsbergen, “An evaluation of feedback in document retrieval using co-occurrence data,” J. Doc.,34, No. 3, 189–216 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. E. Robertson and K. Sparck Jones, “Relevance weighting of search terms,” J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci.,27, No. 3, 129–146 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  22. C. K. Chow and C. N. Liu, “Approximating discrete probability distributions with dependence trees,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theor.,IT-14, No. 3, 462–467 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  23. V. K. Whitney, “Minimal spanning tree, Algorithm 422,” Commun. ACM,15, 273–274 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  24. K. Sparck Jones, “A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval,” J. Doc.,28, 11–21 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  25. W. L. Miller, “Probabilistic search strategy for MEDLARS,” J. Doc.,27, 254–266 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  26. G. Salton and R. K. Waldstein, “Term relevance weights in on-line information retrieval,” Inform. Process. Management,14, 29–35 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  27. V. G. Voiskunskii and V. I. Frants, “Adjustment of request specifications in a documentary IRS,” Nauchn.-Tekh. Inform., Ser. 2, No. 7, 7–12 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  28. V. I. Gor'kova and A. É. Khodzha-Bagirova, “Adjustment of request specifications as a problem of statistical decision theory,” Nauchn.-Inform., Ser. 2, No. 11, 18–21 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  29. A. I. Chernyi, Introduction to the Theory of Information Retrieval [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  30. C. J. van Rijsbergen, Information Retrieval, Butterworth, London and Boston (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gerard Salton, Automatic Information Organization and Retrieval, McGraw-Hill, New York (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  32. N. J. Nilson, Learning Machines—Foundation of Trainable Pattern Classifying Systems, McGraw-Hill, New York (1965), p. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  33. J. J. Rocchio, Jr., “Relevance feedback in information retrieval,” in: G. Salton (ed.), The SMART Retrieval System, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gerard Salton, Dynamic Information and Library Processing, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  35. P. V. Angione, “On the equivalence of Boolean and weighted searching based on the convertibility of query forms,” J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci.,26, No. 2, 112–124 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Yu. M. Gornostaev, S. I. Molibozhenko, and E. V. Sosin, “Comparative description of three software packages (IRMS, DPS, and TEXT-PAC) of IBM implementing IRS,” Nauchn.-Tekh. Inform., Ser. 2, No. 2, 28–36 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  37. J. Martin, Design of Data Bases in Computer Systems [Russian translation], Mir, Moscow (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  38. A. Bookstein, “On the perils of merging Boolean and weighted retrieval systems,” J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci.,28, 156–158 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  39. V. M. Driyanskii and I. B. Dugina, “Computer-oriented algorithm of translation of an arbitrary propositional calculus formula into disjunctive normal form,” in: Semantic Models of Scientific Information Retrieval and Methods of Design of Linguistic Software of Documentary IRS [in Russian], Kiev (1979), pp. 40–46 (Preprint No. 79-8, Institute of Cybernetics, Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR).

  40. V. M. Driyanskii and T. N. Komarova, “Statistical model of adjustment of requests,” in: Methods and Experience with Data Processing Systems Operation [in Russian], Kiev (1979), pp. 47–61.

  41. V. M. Driyanskii and T. N. Komarova, “Presearch model of retrieval in documentary information systems,” in: Proceedings of First All-Union Conference on Data Banks, Sec. 1. Theoretic Problems (Abstracts) [in Russian], Tbilisi (1980), pp. 133–136.

  42. Yu. M. Rakitin, “Possibilities of formal description of descriptor IRS,” Nauchn.-Tekh. Inform., Ser. 2, No. 11 (1978).

  43. A. V. Blek, “Method of information retrieval in a file indexed with key words by using a thesaurus based on expert queries,” Nauchn.-Tekh. Inform., Ser. 2, No. 11, 26–32 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  44. V. S. Shtein, “The language of factographic IRS. Adjustment of request specifications,” Nauchn.-Tekh. Inform., Ser. 2, No. 3, 14–19 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Yu. L. Pokras, “A method for determination of degree of connection of descriptors in an information-retrieval thesaurus,” Nauchn.-Tekh. Inform., Ser. 2, No. 6, 22–24 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  46. V. M. Driyanskii, Semantic Model for Search Specification Adjustment [in Russian], Kiev (1979) (Preprint No. 19-25, Institute of Cybernetics, Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR).

  47. V. S. Shtein, G. A. Teoradze, A. É. Vitel's, T. V. Nazarova, R. N. Sofronova, and G. A. Sokolova, “Request adjustment in a factographic IRS using a pre-coordinate-indexing language and dialogue,” Nauchn.-Tekh. Inform., Ser. 2, No. 3, 19–30 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  48. A. Bookstein and W. Cooper, “Model for information retrieval systems,” Lib. Q.,46, No. 2, 153–167 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  49. A. Bookstein, “When the most ‘pertinent’ document should not be retrieved—an analysis of the Swets model,” Inform. Process. Management,13, 377–383 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  50. D. H. Kraft and A. Bookstein, “Evaluation of information retrieval approach,” J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci.,28, 31–40 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  51. V. P. Chistyakov, Course in Probability Theory [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  52. S. E. Robertson, “The probability ranking principle in IR,” J. Doc.,33, No. 4,294–304 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  53. I. G. Sidorov, “Similarities and differences in problems of associative retrieval and pattern recognition,” Automat Doc. Math. Linguistics,3, No. 2, 61–65 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  54. C. J. van Rijsbergen and K. Sparck Jones, “A test for the separation in relevant and nonrelevant documents in experimental retrieval collections,” J. Doc.,29, 251–257 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  55. C. J. van Rijsbergen, “Further experiments with hierarchic clustering in document retrieval,” Inform. Storage Retrieval,10, 1–14 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  56. S. E. Robertson, “The probabilistic character of relevance,” Inform. Process. Management,13, 247–251 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  57. V. Tahani, “A fuzzy model of information retrieval systems,” Inform. Process. Management,12, 177–187 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  58. T. Radecki, “Mathematical model of information retrieval system based on the concept of fuzzy thesaurus,” Inform. Process. Management,12, 313–318 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  59. S. E. Robertson and N. J. Belkin, “Ranking in principle,” J. Doc.,34, No. 2, 93–100 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  60. L. A. Zadeh, “PRUF—a meaning representation language for natural languages,” Int. J. Man—Machine Stud.,10, 395–460 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. V. M. Driyanskii
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Translated from Kibernetika, No. 2, pp. 102–118, March–April, 1981.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Driyanskii, V.M. Retrieval models in on-line documentary information systems: An analytic review. Cybern Syst Anal 17, 269–287 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01069646

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01069646

Keywords

Search

Navigation