Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 1–19 | Cite as

On the surface structure of infinitive-complement sentences

  • Susan Kemper
  • Jack Catlin
  • John S. Bowers
Article
  • 46 Downloads

Abstract

Linguists' inability to reach consensus about the surface structure of infinitive-complement sentences with verbs likebelieve is a consequence of unresolved foundational disputes about the nature of generative grammar. Naive native speakers' linguistic intuitions about sentences of this type, as assessed by elicitation of judgments about surface structure, also fail to provide a solution to this problem. Insofar as we have no way of deciding on the surface structure ofbelieve-type infinitive-complement sentences, click-displacement results with these materials cannot be used to support either a surface-structure account or a deep-structure account of the parsing of sentences in the process of comprehension.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, D., and Kunz, W. J. (1964).Some Classes of Verbs in English, Linguistics Research Project, Indiana University, Bloomington, Ind.Google Scholar
  2. Bever, T. G., Lackner, J. R., and Kirk, R. (1969). The underlying structures of sentences are the primary units of immediate speech processing.Percept. Psychophys. 5: 225–234.Google Scholar
  3. Chapin, P. G., Smith, T. S., and Abrahamson, A. A. (1972). Two factors in perceptual segmentation of speech.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 11: 164–173.Google Scholar
  4. Chomsky, N. (1965).Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  5. Chomsky, N. (1973). Conditions on transformations. In Anderson, S. R., and Kiparsky, P. (eds.),Studies in Honor of Morris Halle, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, H. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 12: 335–359.Google Scholar
  7. Fodor, J. A., Bever, T. G., and Garrett, M. F. (1974).The Psychology of Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics and Generative Grammar, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Postal, P. M. (1974).On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and Its Theoretical Implications, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  9. Rosenbaum, P. S. (1967).The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  10. Thorndike, E. L., and Lorge, J. (1944).The Teacher's Word Book of 30,000 Words, Bureau of Publications, Teachers' College, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Toppino, T. C. (1974). The underlying structures of sentences are not the primary units of speech processing: A reinterpretation of Bever, Lackner, and Kirk's findings.Percept. Psychophys. 15: 517–518.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan Kemper
    • 1
  • Jack Catlin
    • 1
  • John S. Bowers
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyCornell UniversityIthaca
  2. 2.Department of Modern Languages and LinguisticsCornell UniversityIthaca

Personalised recommendations