Skip to main content
Log in

Children's use of conversational rules in a referential communication task

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three experiments investigating first-grade children's comprehension, of referentially ambiguous messages are reported. In the first one children were shown to interpret a literally ambiguous message by means of the strategy based on the conversational Maxim of Antecedent rather than that based on the more appropriate Maxim of Quantity. The results of the second experiment suggest that the Maxim of Quantity can be used by children, provided the situation is quite simple; they also suggest that after having used such a maxim in a simple situation, children can apply it in a more complex situation. This generalization to new situations, however, is not a mere “perseveration” since, as shown in the third experiment, children can adjust their comprehension strategy to the situation requirements. The results are discussed with reference to the recent proposals on referential ambiguity and children communication failures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asher, S. (1976). Children's ability to appraise their own and another person's communication performance.Developmental Psychology, 12, 24–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaudichon, J. (1978). Structure and efficiency in child communication.International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 5, 59–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H., & Carlson, T. B. (1983). Context for comprehension. In J. Lang & A. Baddeley (Eds.),Attention and performance (Vol. 9), Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H., & Haviland, S. E. (1977). Comprehension and the given-new contract. In R. Freedle (Ed.),Discourse production and comprehension. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H., & Marshall, C. R. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In A. K. Joshi, B. L. Webber, & I. A. Sag (Eds.),Elements of discourse understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, W., & Pechmann, Th. (1982). Social interaction and the development of definite description.Cognition, 11, 159–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, W. P. (1981).Children's oral communication skills. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. C., Bothkin, T., Fry, C. L., Wright, J. C., & Jarvis, P. E. (1968).The development of role-taking and communication skills in children. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, W., & Olson, D. (1975). The elaboration of the noun phrase in children's descriptions.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 19, 371–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glucksberg, S., Krauss, R. M., & Weisberg, R. (1966). Referential communication in nursery school children: Method and some preliminary findings.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 3, 333–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.),Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3),Speech acts. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S., & Jacobs, S., (1982). Ambiguity and implicature in children's discourse comprehension.Journal of Child Language, 9, 209–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, R. M., & Glucksberg, S. (1977). Social and nonsocial speech,Scientific American, 232(2), 100–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, C. J., & Kister, M. C. (1981). The development of listener skills for referential communication. In W. P. Dickson (Ed.),Children's oral communication skills. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, C. J., & Massad, C. M. (1980). Facilitating referential communication among children: The listener as teacher.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 29, 357–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1923).Le langage et la pensée chez l'enfant. Neuchatel: Delachaux et Niestlé.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R., & Patterson, C. (1983). Perspective taking and referential communication: The question of correspondence reconsidered.Child Development, 54, 1005–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, E. J., & Robinson, W. P. (1976). The young child's understanding of communication.Developmental Psychology, 12, 328–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hekker, S. M. J., Vergeer, M. M., & Harris, P. L. (1980). Ambiguity of reference and listeners' reaction in a naturalistic setting.Journal of Child Language, 7, 555–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehurst, G. J., & Sonnenschein S. (1978). Attribute variation leads to contrast failure.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 25, 490–504.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Surian, L., Job, R. Children's use of conversational rules in a referential communication task. J Psycholinguist Res 16, 369–382 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01069289

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01069289

Keywords

Navigation