Abstract
To determine the reliability with which untrained raters could identify stress in the speech of a single person, two forms of the same material, (1) speech broken into short utterances and (2) speech in its conversational context, were presented to 40 linguistically naive psychology students who were asked to underline those syllables that they perceived as stressed. High reliabilities were obtained from both interrater measures (r=0.96 for each treatment) and a test-retest estimate (r=0.88). However, significantly larger total stress scores were recorded under the short utterance presentation than under the context condition. It was suggested that this result occurred because each of the few syllables in short utterances received greater attention than did the stream of syllables in context. Subsequent regression analysis led to the prediction that, for a short passage to attain a mean score equal to that which it would receive if rated in context, it should contain approximately 40 syllables.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abercrombie, D. (1963). Conversation and spoken prose.English Lang. Teaching 18: No. 1.
Allen, G. D. (1972). The location of rhythmic stress beats in English: An experimental study I.Lang. Speech 15: 72–100.
Bolinger, D. L. (1958). A theory of pitch accent in English.Word 14: 109–149.
Chomsky, N. (1965).Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Chomsky, N., and Halle, M. (1968).The Sound Patterns of English, Harper and Row, New York.
Dittmann, A. T., and Wynne, L. C. (1961). Linguistic techniques and the analysis of emotionality in interviews.J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 63: 201–204.
Ebel, R. L. (1951). Estimation of the reliability of ratings.Psychometrika 16: 407–424.
Fónagy, I. (1966). Electrophysiological and acoustic correlates of stress and stress perception.J. Speech Hearing Res. 9: 231–244.
Fry, D. B. (1968). Prosodic phenomena. In Malmberg, B. (ed.),Manual of Phonetics, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 365–410.
Guilford, J. P. (1954).Psychometric Methods, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Hays, W. L. (1963).Statistics for Psychologists, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
Kingdon, R. (1958).The Groundwork of English Stress, Longmans Green, London.
Ladefoged, P. (1963). Some physiological parameters in speech.Lang. Speech 6: 109–119.
Ladefoged, P., Draper, M. H., and Whitteridge, D. (1958). Syllables and stress.Misc. Phon. 3: 1–14.
Lehiste, I., and Peterson, G. E. (1959). Vowel amplitudes and phonemic stress in American English.J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 31: 428–435.
Lieberman, P. (1960). Some acoustic correlates of word stress in American English.J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 32: 451–454.
Lieberman, P. (1963). Some effects of semantic and grammatical context on the production and perception of speech.Lang. Speech 6: 172–187.
Lieberman, P. (1965). On the acoustic basis of the perception of intonation by linguists.Word 21: 40–54.
Lieberman, P. (1976).Intonation, Perception and Language, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Markel, N. (1965). The reliability of coding paralanguage: pitch, loudness, and tempo.J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 4: 306–308.
Martin, J. G. (1972). Rhythmic (hierarchical) versus serial structure in speech and other behavior.Psychol. Rev. 79: 487–509.
Morton, J., and Jassem, W. (1965). Acoustic correlates of stress.Lang. Speech 8: 159–181.
Pike, K. L. (1945).Intonation of American English, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Sokal, R., and Rohlf, J. (1969).Biometry, Freeman, San Francisco.
Trager, G. L., and Smith, H. L., Jr. (1951). An outline of English Structure.Stud. Ling. Occasional Papers, Vol. 3.
Winer, B. J. (1962).Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McDowall, J.J. The reliability of ratings by linguistically untrained subjects in response to stress in speech. J Psycholinguist Res 3, 247–259 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01069241
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01069241