Abstract
An aural conjunctive concept formation experiment used as stimuli sentences varying systematically in Voice (active/passive), Mood (declarative/interrogative), Modality (affirmative/negative), tense, and lexical content. Target classes were the eight sentence types defined by all combinations of the first three syntactic variables. Aural processing was more difficult than visual, but higher education level facilitated concept acquisition for males and females equally (cf. Bakeret al., 1973). The 64 undergraduate subjects tended to avoid syntactic analysis in depth, classifying sentences on as cursory a basis as the task allowed. The simple, unequivocal syntactic signals of Mood and Modality meaning were readily apparent, but the discrimination of Voice was complicated by ambiguous syntactosemantic associations and lack of discourse context. Voice is thus not seen as a determinant of utterance type, but as a context- and content-dependent realization of agent or object focus in transitive messages.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker, W. J., Prideaux, G. D., and Derwing, B. L. (1973). Grammatical properties of sentences as a basis for concept formation.J. Psycholing. Res. 2: 201–220.
Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In Hayes, J. R. (ed.),Cognition and the Development of Language, Wiley, New York.
Chafe, W. L. (1970).Meaning and the Structure of Language, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Chomsky, N. (1957).Syntactic Structures, Mouton, The Hague.
Chomsky, N. (1959). Review of B. F. Skinner,Verbal Behavior. Language,35: 26–58.
Chomsky, N. (1964).Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, Mouton, The Hague.
Chomsky, N. (1965),Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Chomsky, N. (1968).Language and Mind, Harcourt, Brace and World, New York.
Clifton, C., and Odom, P. (1966). Similarity relations among certain English sentence constructions.Psychol. Monogr. 80: No. 5.
Cohen, L. J. (1966). Discussion of the Fodor and Garrett paper. In Lyons, J., and Wales, R. J. (eds.),Psycholinguistics Papers, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 163–173.
Deese, J., and Hulse, S. H. (1967).The Psychology of Learning, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Fodor, J. A., and Garrett, M. (1966). Some reflections on competence and performance. In Lyons, J., and Wales, R. J. (eds.),Psycholinguistics Papers, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
Fodor, J. A., and Garrett, M. (1967). Some syntactic determinants of sentential complexity.Percept. Psychophys. 2: 289–296.
Gough, P. B. (1966). The verification of sentences: The effects of delay of evidence and sentence length.J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 5: 492–496.
Harris, Z. S. (1951).Structural Linguistics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Katz, J. J., and Postal, P. (1964).An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Matthews, W. A. (1968). Transformational complexity and short-term recall.Lang. Speech 11: 120–128.
Mehler, J. (1963). Some effects of grammatical transformation on the recall of English sentences.J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 2: 346–351.
Miller, G. A., and Chomsky, N. (1963). Finitary models of language users. In Luce, R. D. Bush, R. R., and Galanter, E. (eds.),Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 2, Wiley, New York.
Miller, G. A., and McKean, K. O. (1964). A chronometric study of some relations between sentences.Quart. J. Expertl. Psychol., 297–308.
Savin, H. B., and Perchonock, E. (1965). Grammatical structure and the immediate recall of English sentences.J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 4: 348–353.
Slobin, D. I. (1968). Recall of full and truncated passives in connected discourse.J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 7: 876–881.
Stuart, C. I. J. M. (1969). On the empirical foundations of linguistic description.Actes Xe Congr. Internat. Ling. (Bucharest) 1: 393–399.
Winer, B. J. (1962).Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This report is based on an M.Sc. thesis completed at the University of Alberta (Edmonton, Canada), in 1972
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reid, J.R. Sentence-type variables as aural concept formation dimensions. J Psycholinguist Res 3, 233–245 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01069240
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01069240