Skip to main content
Log in

The representation of time and location in memory for sentences

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two theoretical approaches to the representation of Time and Location Markers in Memory were contrasted. According to predictions derived from one approach, the amount of forgetting will be the same for two-proposition sentences and sentences with a single proposition and a Time or a Location marker. According to the other approach, the amount of forgetting will be the same for one-proposition sentences and sentences with a Time or a Location Marker. Propositional structure and the level of within-sentence associations were orthogonally varied to create eight within-subject experimental conditions. Ninety subjects studied 40 sentences and were required to recall then. Four dependent variables were used: number of sentences completely recalled, number of sentences partially recalled, number of sentences where information was lost from within the proposition, and number of sentences where a complete proposition was lost. The results suggest that Time and Location markers are represented in memory as arguments in a proposition rather than as separate propositions. Level of associations within the sentence seems to have a different effect when the sentence is composed of one or two propositions. The results also suggest that there may be differences between the representations of Time and Location markers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. R.Language, memory, and thought. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H.Human associative memory. Washington, D.C.: Winston, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W.The representation of meaning in memory, Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A., Rumelhart, P. E., & LNR Research Group.Exploration in cognition. San Francisco: Freeman, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A.Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peleg, Z. R. Case relations vs. associations as sources of constructive processes in memory for sentences.American Journal of Psychology, 1978,91, 619–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. L., & Lorge, I.The teacher's word book of 30,000 words. New York: Colubia University Press, 1944.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peleg, Z.R. The representation of time and location in memory for sentences. J Psycholinguist Res 11, 169–182 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068219

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068219

Keywords

Navigation